It is clear that our system does not hold the highest office in the land to any concrete standard of proof. The POTUS needs to supply LEGITIMATE documentation that he/she has met the constitutional requirements (all three)which also means the proof that the candidate's parents are both US Citizens and that the candidate was born on US soil. The provided verification should be able to be independently verified by the ...more »
Requires people to get to the point.
Part of the vetting process for ALL appointees and candidates for elected office should REQUIRE that they submit to a background check and be able to qualify for the level of security clearance commensurate with the information to which they will have acceess by virtue of their position.
Public comments in the final stages of rulemaking (the process agencies use to translate legislation into action) are not the most participatory technique, but - online - they are far more transparent than in the past, and generally mandatory! However, by the time a proposed rule or other action is open for comments, important decisions may already have been made. Involving the public earlier and increasing interaction ...more »
ILLEGALS HAVE NO RIGHTS IN THE USA UNDER OUR CONSTITUTION. SO MR HOLDER YOUR WITHDRAWAL OF THE BUSH DEPORTATION RULE, ALLOWING ILLEGALS WITH NO RIGHTS TO ARGUE THEIR LAWYERS DID A BAD JOB TO STAY HERE LONGER IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. EITHER FOLLOW THE CONSTITUTION OR GET OUT OF OFFICE.
Stop all prescription drug advertising and save all that money. Furthermore, we would no longer be subjected to offensive and disturbing reminders of our physical fears. An additional side benefit would be not having to watch candle lit intimate scenes implying private chemical induced virility.
1. To increase transparency, participation, and collaboration in the rulemaking process start telling the truth, the whole truth, about rulemaking on the government’s Regulations.gov website. The site, initiated during the Bush Administration, was a useful but limited step forward in making the rulemaking process more transparent and encouraging participation. The site incorrectly gives the impression that THE opportunity ...more »
If your idea is submitted 5 minutes before the brainstorming process ends it may not receive enough votes to be considered even if its a fantastic idea.
How about brainstorming first, then a voting period with consideration of the ideas, then discussion of the top suggestions followed by implementation.
Municipalities and regions undertaking projects in high-speed networking be encouraged to create online forums that: * Post regional maps showing the demographic features, geographical features, patterns of network use, and technological facilities relevant to the project * Accept proposals, provide comment and rating systems, and run polls * Provide public terminals and low-bandwidth versions of data, so that people ...more »
Make a text limit of 500 words for each Idea submitted, and another 250 words for the reason why.
Other contributors under this initiative asked for truth to be told by the Government, e.g., in science, business, without "spinning" the information to suit its political purpose. I want to make this more general and argue that Open Government should establish it as its rule open, truthfull information will be its basic "stock & trade" to work with and to uphold. Or would bringing honesty into politics would be too ...more »
Yes, we can define it as junk email, no problem. However it doesn't seem to be possible to unsubscribe and it should be.
22. Federal Regulation and Testing of all Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) by the FDA: All genetically modified seeds sold within the United States and abroad must be tested by the Food and Drug Administration and/or other governmental agencies prior to allowing human consumption. Currently there is no governmental oversight of this vital product which has found its way into nearly every processed food product that ...more »
Terminate direct financial aid to Foreign governments to enable them to purchase goods and services from other countries. The aid that is provided is viewed as Bribes by their citizens who do not appreciate the U.S.
Why don't you limit the lawyers from filing frivolous lawsuits? When someone slips and falls on a grape in the supermarket, they sue and get paid off. This is ridiculous. When a doctor tries to save someone’s life and they die, they get sued. If you truly want to bring down the cost of health insurance, STOP THE LAWYERS that are adding hundreds of millions of dollars to the cost. Oh yea, after thinking about my question ...more »