|
|
luvwith
|
luvwith
Member since : May-27-2009 (Verified)
10 Ideas, 324 Comments, 300 Votes
|
| | |
|
User Activity Stream
Ideas Posted
|
|
What do ya say?
se⋅di⋅tion [si-dish-uhn] Show IPA –noun 1. incitement of discontent or rebellion against a government. 2. any action, esp. in speech or writing, promoting such discontent or rebellion. 3. Archaic. rebellious disorder.
Synonyms: 1. insurrection, mutiny. See treason.
Conduct or language inciting rebellion against the authority of a state. Insurrection; rebellion.
1. The raising of commotion in a state, not amounting to insurrection; conduct tending to treason, but without an overt act; excitement of discontent against the government, or of resistance to lawful authority.
In soothing them, we nourish 'gainst our senate The cockle of rebellion, insolence, sedition. --Shak.
Noisy demagogues who had been accused of sedition. --Macaulay.
2. Dissension; division; schism. [Obs.]
Now the works of the flesh are manifest, . . . emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies. --Gal. v. 19, 20.
Syn: Insurrection; tumult; uproar; riot; rebellion; revolt.
Acts that incite rebellion or civil disorder against an established government.
c.1375, "rebellion," from O.Fr. sedicion, from L. seditionem (nom. seditio) "civil disorder, dissention," lit. "a going apart, separation," from se- "apart" (see secret) + itio "a going," from pp. of ire "to go." Meaning "conduct or language inciting to rebellion against a lawful government" is from 1838.
Main Entry: se·di·tion Pronunciation: si-'di-sh&n Function: noun Etymology: Latin seditio, literally, separation, from sed apart + itio act of going, from ire to go : the crime of creating a revolt, disturbance, or violence against lawful civil authority with the intent to cause its overthrow or destruction
Sedition From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This is about the law term. For other uses see Sedition (disambiguation)
Sedition is a term of law which refers to overt conduct, such as speech and organization, that is deemed by the legal authority as tending toward insurrection against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent (or resistance) to lawful authority. Sedition may include any commotion, though not aimed at direct and open violence against the laws. Seditious words in writing are seditious libel. A seditionist is one who engages in or promotes the interests of sedition.
Typically,sedition is considered a subversive act, and the overt acts that may be prosecutable under sedition laws vary from one legal code to another. Where the history of these legal codes has been traced, there is also a record of the change in the definition of the elements constituting sedition at certain points in history. This overview has served to develop a sociological definition of sedition as well, within the study of state persecution.
The difference between sedition and treason consists primarily in the subjective ultimate object of the violation to the public peace. Sedition does not consist of levying war against a government nor of adhering to its enemies, giving enemies aid, and giving enemies comfort. Nor does it consist, in most representative democracies, of peaceful protest against a government, nor of attempting to change the government by democratic means (such as direct democracy or constitutional convention).
Sedition is the stirring up of rebellion against the government in power. Treason is the violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or state, giving aid to enemies, or levying war against one's state. Sedition is encouraging one's fellow citizens to rebel against their state, whereas treason is actually betraying one's country by aiding and abetting another state. Sedition laws somewhat equate to Terrorism and Public Order laws.
|
|
|
Nobody in the history of this country was more successful at passing what conservatives will tell you are their key issues. He was not a failure by any stretch of the imagination if you are judging by how much of his party's agenda was achieved.
What did he do to deserve this title?
Biggest tax cuts in history
Biggest cuts in "social" programs
Biggest rollbacks of environmental protections
Most defense spending ever
Biggest rollbacks in business and development regulations and timber
Biggest giveaways of public land for mountaintop mining
Biggest crackdown on civil liberties
Biggest cuts in higher education budgets
Privatization of Military, law enforcement and prison infrastructure
Biggest cuts in Veteran's benefits
Two new ultra right Supreme Court picks
And on and on...
There is nothing this man did that was a failure...if you are judging by whether one advances his party's interests. He was able to accomplish things that conservatives have been whimpering that the dirty "Libtard" congresses of Nixon, Bush I, and Reagan blocked them from doing for 40 years.
Well, the stars lined up for them. They got everything they said would "free capitalism" from the bonds of "big government" to work it's magic.
What did we get?
Worst creation record since Hoover
Actually LOST jobs over his entire first term
300,000 jobs for his second term (Jimmy Carter created 10 million jobs in his "worst economy in history)
Millions more without health insurance
Millions more collecting unemployment from the government
Millions of people’s retirement saving WIPED OUT
Homes worth half what people paid for them
Major decline of respect for US in the world
Continued terrorist attacks on US soil (Anthrax? Snipers?)
Stagnant wages in the midst of inflation in the prices of fuel, food, education and health care resulting in a NET LOSS in the standard of living of the vast majority in this country
Largest gap between rich and poor in this country since the beginning of the Great Depression
It is not George W. Bush's fault and it is not his failure. The fault for the state of this country rests firmly on the POLICIES not the PERSONALITY of GEORGE W BUSH! It is conservative, trickle down, “let business regulate itself” policies that got us where we are.
If we don't acknowledge that then we will repeat this experiment again in the next election.
|
|
|
It's a free podcast. You guys need to understand how manipulated you really are.
|
|
|
They contribute nothing to the debate. They are interested in speaking...not listening.
|
|
|
This person is abusing the site by posting the same thing hundres of times.
|
|
|
We, the users of this site have been abused by endless posts calling for Obama to show his birth Certificate. One post calling for this will do.
If you support that, then vote and be done with it on ONE POST. Leave comments if you must. But to clutter this site with endless repeats of ANY post for ANYTHING is to abuse all the users of this site.
The fact is most of us don't care what you have to say. More people voted for Obama than any president in history. This story has been debunked, thoroughly by independent non-partisan sources.
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html
We should not have to wade through 50 of the same ridiculous post when one will suffice. Anybody who deliberately sets out to waste the time of people on this site who are sincerely trying to have a dialogue on ways to make government better needs to have the privilege of partaking in this process taken away.
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html
We should not have to wade through 50 of the same ridiculous post when one will suffice. Anybody who deliberately sets out to waste the time of people on this site who are sincerely trying to have a dialogue on ways to make government better needs to have the priviledge of partaking in this process taken away.
|
|
|
THE ONLY THING THAT CAN PUT A BOTTOM IN THE REALESTAE MARKET IS NEW BUYERS!
I had to say no on bailing out homeowners with bad mortgages. Not because I want foreclosures, but because it won't work. There is not enough money in the world to bail out enough homeowners to stop the fall of real estate prices.
For the money it costs to bail out banks and bail out homeowners we could put a bottom in the market right now. Obama hade a good start with tax credits for 1st time home-buyers.
Incentives to buy, loan guarantees, help with down-payments if you can show the ability to pay a mortgage, tax credits for home buyers even if they aren't first time home buyers and even if they are buying it for an investment or rental property, are all a better way to put a bottom on the market.
If you can stop the market from crashing further then most of the homeowners you're looking to bail out would stay in their homes. If the market keeps going down and more and more people are going to be upside down in their mortgages then people are going to keep walking away from their loans no matter how much "good money after bad" you throw at them. A tax credit won't be enough to keep someone paying a mortgage on a house that is worth one third of what they owe on it.
You want to bail out the banks? If you give loan guarantees or down-payment assistance to homebuyers that money will go directly to the bottom line of the bank, and it will staunch the hemorrhaging of the housing crash so the banks assets will stop falling in value, also adding to the bottom line.
Obama is right on this one but he hasn't gone far enough.
|
|
|
PUBLIC CAMPAIGN FINANCING
We must have public financing of campaigns. I know you think you don't want to pay for it...but you already ARE!
You pay hundreds and thousands of times what you would if the politicians actually answered to you and not greedy corporate criminals. You pay thousands of times more in a CORRUPTION SURCHARGE!
YOU PAY FOR PRIVATELY FUNDED ELECTIONS RIGHT NOW!
Every no bid contract, every unpaid royalty on an oil lease, every blocked piece of legislation, every blocked investigation, every effort to get healthcare for all, every blocked attempt for a living wage, every needless nuclear warhead that will never be used, every mountaintop removal mining permit OK’d, every case of cancer caused by lax environmental rules or enforcement, every prison built instead of a school...YOU PAY AND PAY AND PAY!
And to add insult to injury, where do corporations get the money they give politicians in order to insure they can roll right over you whenever they want? FROM YOU! The cost of these payoffs is passed on to YOU the consumer!
THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE IN THE COUNTRY!
Whatever you think is the most important issue facing the country…forget about it. It’s going to be decided in favor of those in power. It will be watered down in favor of those who finance campaigns and control corporate media sources.
You think the health care debate is going to come out in your favor or Pfizer’s? You think we are really going to cut military spending when more than half of the military budget for the entire world is being lavished on some of the biggest campaign contributors there are? How about Bank reform? Wall Street? Big Pharma? Iraq? The environment? Just exactly how do you see any of that working out in your favor in our current system?
Our system is broken. Our government does not work for the people. It works for – or in fear of – people who can spend a lot of money, access a lot of media, or have a lot of power in society.
IT’S THE MODERATES!
What people don’t understand is that it is not necessary to buy off the whole government in order for corporate, big money interests to get its way…every time. You merely need to control either the moderates and/or the committee heads in order to assure that whatever compromise is reached it will ALWAYS benefit BIG MONEY!
In Congress, you have partisans on either side, in safe districts, with entrenched interests who won’t compromise and are at no risk of being voted out.
Then you have the folks in the purple districts. They could get the ax anytime. Their elections could come down to which candidate has a few thousand more to spend. If Big Money goes their way they stay, if it goes to their opponent they are out.
These are the people you count on to forge the compromise between the two extremes and these are the very people who are most vulnerable to big money coming in hard and heavy against them.
COMPROMISE IS ALWAYS IN FAVOR OF BIG MONEY!
The current system assures that any compromise between the partisan extremes will be concluded in favor of big money. Even the most conscientious moderate politician in a contested state MUST cater to big money or they will not stay in congress.
WHAT HAPPENED TO CONGRESS?
Do you wonder what has happened to democrats in congress over the last 8 years…the spinelessness and cowardice evidenced by these people?
This is the result of what happens to an organization over time when anyone who fights big money gets weeded out…even if it’s only one or two per election. Eventually you are left with …well, what we have now…a bunch of corporate lap dogs.
|
|
|
Charge decision makers at any polluting business who buys a patent for a cleaner technology - simply to make sure it never comes to market - with treason or crimes against humanity.
At the very least it should be illegal to buy a patent for the purposes of keeping it from being produced and given the amount of money at stake penalties must be severe. A one percent increase in an engines efficiency means trillions in lost profits for big oil.
Air and water pollution causes hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of deaths every year and is putting the continued existence of human life on this planet at risk so that a very few can make obscene profits while the vast majority needlessly suffer respiratory illness, cancer, global warming, etc.
It is standard for Oil companies to buy up battery and other fuel efficiency technology in order to keep it off the market or "develop it so slowly that it grinds progress to a halt. And of course that puts the best, most efficient, least toxic materials off limits for anyone else trying to develop similar technology…seriously hampering advancement of cleaner engines.
The Oil and Utility companies get the patents by instigating frivolous lawsuits they know they'll never win but that the smaller companies can't afford to litigate. They file bogus claim after bogus claim with an infinite supply of legal talent on permanent salary and unlimited funds.
First they will bankrupt a company…then they offer the environmental entrepreneur a chunk money to wash their hands of the project and sell the patent once there is no chance the company can ever recover financially or afford to produce it once they've hemorrhaged all their capital in legal fees.
Then they force a draconian non-disclosure agreement and the public never hears about it. They spend billions of dollars in TV and radio ads to green up their images and to make sure no one ever does a story on the practice.
If that is not a crime against humanity what is?
|
|
|
You live in Florida and your views line up more with Nader but you're afraid to give your vote to Bush? Support instant runoff elections!
It allows you a second choice candidate. If your choice is not in the top two your vote will go to you second choice...Gore! Then you can vote your conscience without being responsible for 8 years of SHRUB and Dick Cheney!
If you are not satisfied with the 2 party monopoly stranglehold, not only of power, but of ideas and debate...then instant runoff voting is the only way these voices will ever be heard.
|
| Displaying 1 - 25 of 4205 Ideas |
Comments Posted
| |