Make certain the emerging "New World Order" has truly democratic accountability
The US government, along with numerous other governments around the world, has been planning and implementing measures over the years to usher ...more »
The US government, along with numerous other governments around the world, has been planning and implementing measures over the years to usher in what Bush Sr., Clinton, and Bush Jr. have all referred to as a "New World Order (NWO)." Candid comments from other numerous government officials about plans for the NWO suggest that this it will essentially be a single, global governing body that will govern all nations.
Yes, this does sound like a very ambitious undertaking, but we have been assured repeatedly that plans are moving forward and that once the global leader, the U.S., is willing to drop down a few rungs to be on par with other nations, the plan will be quickly implemented.
My concern is that, because this plan tends to be rather secretive and is not covered by our media, we have no way of knowing whether this new governing body intends to be democratic or an aristocracy. Because the known interests behind the formation of the New World Order tend to be the richest of the rich corporate elite (like Rockefeller and other Wall Street titans), they already represent an elite aristocracy.
I agree that if this NWO ends wars and poverty, and restores environmental sanity, that is good. But if in doing so it strips us of our democratic freedoms, I'm not sure I agree. Besides, many of these same corporate elite have been responsible for much of the environmental destruction, global exploitation and poverty, and supporters of wars. Consequently, I am a bit concerned about who will be running the show, and whether the global populace will have some sort of veto power, because I believe that the interests of the Rockefellers are not the interests of the average person.
« less full details »
Social Web