Open Government Dialogue
« Back To OpenGov - Open Government Brainstorm

lisaheft

User Profile Image lisaheft
Member since : May-24-2009 (Verified)
3 Ideas, 2 Comments, 101 Votes

User Activity Stream

Ideas Posted

Dialogue is not just for groups to come to an agreement, engage citizens or make a decision.

Dialogic methods are also used to help groups think faster, more creatively, and more productively while engaging all the knowledge, wisdom, experience and diversity in the room in an interdisciplinary, intercultural, dynamic manner.

Note here that I am including in the term dialogue both methods / tools / processes that invite speaking as those which invite listening and reflection. In true dialogue, there are both the speaker(s) and those who are truly listening. And dialogue also includes both outer (such as talking or inquiring) and inner dialogue (such as thinking while drawing, journaling, reflecting in silence before speaking)

My recommendation is to design more dialogic tools into business, government, non-profits and communities, both in the U.S. and in any project, program, activity or office the U.S. has in other parts of the world.

Facilitators such as myself have seen the use of dialogue in such examples as:
- dialogue before budgeting, to figure out new ways to spend over a billion dollars worth of international aid money
- dialogue before strategic planning to help a global organization's information technology department be more innovative and more service-oriented in a changing business climate
- program and product design that has broken through to new geographic regions or new marketplaces because dialogue helped people think in full-systems, interdisciplinary ways
- meetings where organizations or businesses invite not just the 'experts' but also consumers, partners, peers and even competitors for needs assessment, response to urgent issues, or knowledge exchange
- dialogue in governmental agencies working in other countries to foster collaboration, examine issues of sensitivity and engages all members of international staff in a way that invites all voices in spite of different cultural dynamics
- meetings, conferences, forums or planning sessions that include people of different levels of power, or minority voices and create an environment of inclusion and invitation to speak and share knowledge across culture and across differences
... and I could go on.

If I may speak for us - those of us in the profession of facilitation have seen groups accomplish amazing things when dialogic and interactive processes have been used.
(for those of you unfamiliar with these terms, see this description of interactive learning: http://www.openingspace.net/interactiveLearning_whatIsIt.shtml - in this case, I am talking about face-to-face learning - but technology for learning can and is also being used to engage more than text on a screen or audio in a podcast)

We have learned much about learning. We have learned that designing training and education in more interactive ways increases learners' ability to integrate and retain learning and also learn concepts, not just facts.

Interactive learning design includes not just a design of the facts to teach, but the whole 'ecology of learning', if you will. Placement around / use of / movement in the room, group dynamics and dialogue, using more than text or oral receipt of information. People absorb and exchange information / data differently, so to reach all forms of learners, a good interactive learning facilitator designs her/his workshops or presentations engaging more of the different modalities of learning. Instead of lecture or PowerPoint, more hands-on or teach-each other forms of learning. Instead of just delivering information through text or audio (lecture or reading), us of multiple modalities such as graphic, kinesthetic and/or relational learning. Instead of the same dynamic throughout the lesson, mixing in small group or duo discussion and discovery, silent reflective work, use of materials, and other approaches such as role play or scenario work, use of graphic templates or tools for participants, and moving to indicate such things as different places on a continuum or different points of view. Instead of question-and-answer, interactive dialogue and inquiry. Instead of the teacher 'owning' the information, designing learning so information is put into the hands of the learners and part of their learning is figuring out how to teach their peers.

My recommendation is to raise the capacity of those who present, teach and invite learning in government, business, educational institutions, non-profits and community. To teach interactive learning methodology; to shift folks 'at the front of the room' from 'expert' or 'knowledge holders' to learning facilitators.

With all of these recommendations about the use of facilitation or interactive learning, there are many of us who do this as a profession and several ways to locate and invite us into re-designing learning and training trainers and presenters nation-wide and internationally (the US government and US organizations do so much in so many locations around the world)

Organizations such as International Association of Facilitators, National Coalition for Dialogue and Deliberation, American Society for Training and Development, many other organizations, associations, educational programs and regional networks of facilitators and trainers have within them people who specialize in designing and teaching how to teach and present using interactive methodology.


Engage facilitators to teach neighborhood and organizational representatives how to facilitate short-form dialogue processes / methods.

There is an existing network of Obama neighborhood organizers - add in other representatives from local nonprofits, businesses, local government, faith communities and other organizations.

To this group, teach proven dialogue methods for engaging conversation and discussion - forms of dialogue which can engage a group in 3 hours or less. Only certain forms work for this but they work very well. These trainings are best done over time to teach a skill, allow practice of the skill, return to share experiences and best practices, apply again: action learning.

Dialogue tools help individuals understand across differences, share experiences, listen for common threads in someone else's viewpoint, combine diverse ideas or cultural ways of looking at things to solve problems, gather data to see a full-systems perspective on an issue or opportunity, engage people, foster collaboration, and tap into rich knowledge and cultural diversity in the process.

Use professional facilitators who are skilled in these particular methods and who also understand how to teach. They can be the mentors to the community facilitators as a community of learning and practice is fostered.

Invitation is essential - invite across organization, region, age, ability, experience, culture, class - the key is to identify and train people who set ego aside in service to the group and its work - who invite and engage rather than direct.
Displaying 1 - 25 of 4205 Ideas

Comments Posted

lisaheft 9 months ago
Hear hear, Deb. I heartily agree. Really good facilitation does not make apparent the pre-work and careful thought about objectives, context, design and choice of appropriate dialogue tool that goes into supporting the success of a meeting, discussion or forum. However there are lessons learned that can be shared, tips and tools for helping people navigate through complex issues and emotions, and more lessons learned about the 'what-ifs' and 'when-not-to's'. I think anyone in a convenor role can gain so much from learning about how to facilitate or from working in partnership with a facilitator.
lisaheft 9 months ago
Yes - what I think Heidi is referring to is a comment I made on another website where majority vote is an interesting and useful thing in many circumstances - however I welcome those other ways of noting patterns, inviting input and making decisions where even a single person's idea or voice can be valued - as a single person's idea can sometimes be the one that shifts our whole way of thinking. Some of my favorite tools of dialogue also include this ability to honor single different viewpoints while at the same time inviting the group to note its common threads and patterns.

Rzkowalski - In a way I am glad that you are not as interested in what I am interested in - because you are *so* interested in another aspect of citizen engagement. If each of us contributes to our community and country in those ways we care so deeply about, we can create such positive change. Indeed, I'm guessing you already have.

And libertyferall - thank you for your thoughts and support of this idea. You are so articulate in underlining the elements and the values I was identifying that approach capacity building for listening and dialogue in a way that engages interconnection, co-learning and diversity...