OpenGov - Open Government Brainstorm

david.is.farrar

Member since 2 years ago

Badges

• 
• 
• 

Powered by BadgeFarm

4 ideas posted

16 comments 42 votes

239 points

• 0
• 116
• 0
• 28
• 95
• 0
• 0
• 0

View the Leaderboard

david.is.farrar is a member of:

• Isakson Solution Center

Activity Stream

Ideas contributed by david.is.farrar

• I agree

  Voting is Disabled

  48 votes

  I disagree
  This idea is active.
  Making Data More Accessible »

  Deleting duplicate posts

  When you say you delete "duplicate" posts, what criteria are you using? I see lots of duplicate posts here, some even by the same authors as ...more »

  When you say you delete "duplicate" posts, what criteria are you using? I see lots of duplicate posts here, some even by the same authors as far as I can tell.

  Secondly, when you delete posts, do you publish a notice of removal in its place, and state the reasons for its deletion? It's a matter of transparency that the public is made aware that a certain post has been removed, and why.

  ex animo

  davidfarrar

  « less full details »

  4 comments

  Submitted by david.is.farrar 2 years ago

• I agree

  Voting is Disabled

  48 votes

  I disagree
  This idea is active.
  Making Data More Accessible »

  Time to come clean

  I may have missed it, but if the owners/operators of this website have the ability to match IP addresses with their voting record, they should ...more »

  I may have missed it, but if the owners/operators of this website have the ability to match IP addresses with their voting record, they should come forth with that information. It's called "TRANSPARENCY".

  ex animo

  davidfarrar

  « less full details »

  Add your comment

  Submitted by david.is.farrar 2 years ago

• I agree

  Voting is Disabled

  51 votes

  I disagree
  This idea is active.
  Making Data More Accessible »

  Do not remove any post from OGD site as a matter of transparency

  Once you remove a post, you become responsible for that removal. I would suggest you simply remove the offending post to another OGD webs page, ...more »

  Once you remove a post, you become responsible for that removal. I would suggest you simply remove the offending post to another OGD webs page, entitled "OGD Off-Topic" site" and provide a link to this post where their original post was posted on OGD. In this way, OGD is not abridging anyone 1ts Amendments Rights should they apply now or later. Secondly, it will give all an opportunity to judge the voracity of the claim of removal, while preserving transparency.

  « less full details »

  3 comments

  Submitted by david.is.farrar 2 years ago

• I agree

  Voting is Disabled

  73 votes

  I disagree
  This idea is active.
  Legal & Policy Challenges »

  Full incorporation of the protections of the Bill of Rights

  I have been recently shocked to learn that not all of the protections we presently enjoy against the federal government in the Bill of Rights ...more »

  I have been recently shocked to learn that not all of the protections we presently enjoy against the federal government in the Bill of Rights have never been fully incorporated into state law. Meaning, some of the freedoms we assume we all enjoy under the Bill of Rights may be taken away from us by state law. This is totally unconscionable. What good is it to have a federal right to bears arms, only to have them taken away by state agents?

  « less full details »

  7 comments

  Submitted by david.is.farrar 2 years ago

Displaying all 4 Ideas

All feedback received through the Open Government Dialogue is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.

• Crowdsourcing
• Crowdsourcing Software
• iPhone Feedback
• OpenGov
• Suggestion Box
• Idea Management Software
• Employee Suggestion Box
• Brainstorming Tool
• Innovation Management