A suggested structure for New Stratagies and Techniques
It looks like the White House folks are thinking of incorporating Open Gevernment Dialogue into the formal structure of government. Good for them!
johnbrose
Member since 4 years ago
johnbrose is a member of:
Activity Stream
-
Received positive feedback on Idea: A suggested structure for New Stratagies and Techniques3 years ago
-
Received positive feedback on Idea: A suggested structure for New Stratagies and Techniques3 years ago
-
Received positive feedback on Idea: A suggested structure for New Stratagies and Techniques3 years ago
-
Received positive feedback on Idea: Remember that dialogue must be two-way, personal and on-going3 years ago
-
Received positive feedback on Idea: A suggested structure for New Stratagies and Techniques3 years ago
-
Received positive feedback on Idea: A suggested structure for New Stratagies and Techniques3 years ago
-
Received positive feedback on Idea: Remember that dialogue must be two-way, personal and on-going3 years ago
-
Received positive feedback on Idea: A suggested structure for New Stratagies and Techniques3 years ago
-
Received positive feedback on Idea: Remember that dialogue must be two-way, personal and on-going3 years ago
-
Received positive feedback on Idea: A suggested structure for New Stratagies and Techniques3 years ago
Ideas contributed by johnbrose
-
I agree
Voting is Disabled5 votes
I disagreeThis idea is active.Federal Advisory Committees »4 comments for Idea: A suggested structure for New Stratagies and Techniques -
I agree
Voting is Disabled
7 votes
I disagreeThis idea is active.New Strategies and Techniques »Remember that dialogue must be two-way, personal and on-going
Speaking into a vast beaureaucratic void is not a dialogue. There must be a response that the initial speaker can identify as elicited by what the speaker said. It has to be personal. Somebody heard me and is responding to what I said. Even if my comment is listed with many other similar comments and they are all responded to at once, as long as I can see my comment in there and the response does indeed address what ...more »
4 comments for Idea: Remember that dialogue must be two-way, personal and on-goingSpeaking into a vast beaureaucratic void is not a dialogue. There must be a response that the initial speaker can identify as elicited by what the speaker said. It has to be personal.
Somebody heard me and is responding to what I said. Even if my comment is listed with many other similar comments and they are all responded to at once, as long as I can see my comment in there and the response does indeed address what I said.
But it can't stop there. We come to experience that we are all in this together only by going back and forth over the issues with our objections and concerns. We learn through our conversation, about the diversity of our experiences and viewpoints, but also our unity of adherence to fairness and responsibility.
« less full details »
Social Web