Open Government Dialogue
« Back To OpenGov - Open Government Brainstorm

shaaslyons

User Profile Image shaaslyons
Member since : May-21-2009 (Verified)
2 Ideas, 3 Comments, 73 Votes

User Activity Stream

Ideas Posted

Require all agencies to submit a plan for how they will incorporate open government activities into their missions. Within 180 days, agencies will produce a plan to integrate public involvement and collaboration into all relevant systems [human resources, planning and budget]. Agencies must demonstrate that internal and external stakeholders participate in the development of the plans. Each agency must designate an appropriate person in the Office of the Secretary to produce the plan.

This recommendation was developed in April 2009 by federal agency managers attending "Champions of Participation" http://www.americaspeaks.org/champions
Agencies generally do not adequately plan for or budget to integrate public participation or collaborative processes into their programmatic work. To undertake small and large-scale public participation or collaborative efforts, agencies often have to re-program personnel and dollars or look to other program sources, effectively “robbing Peter to pay Paul.”

Additionally, many public participation and collaborative efforts are long-term in nature and annual budget cycles do not generally allow for budgeting for multi-year processes.

For public participation to be done well, adequate resources must be dedicated for this purpose. Funding is needed to support new uses of technology, education and skills training, travel, administrative support, and expert assistance such as facilitators.

By soliciting public input, the Open Government Directive promises to make government more efficient, reducing costs related to overlooked information or stakeholders, lengthy campaigns to educate the public after the fact, and concealed redundancies. Therefore, a significant initial investment, may promise to pay for itself over a period of years. OMB should work with the other task forces and oversight groups to determine this window of years and track the savings provided to the tax-paying public. This will also serve to provide greater incentive for Americans participate in open government, by providing high-level input.

Recommendations for action, developed in April 2009 by federal agency managers attending "Champions of Participation":

1. Direct agencies to incorporate participation and collaboration into funding requests and major project planning, such as: in the formulation and justification of budget requests funding; in the process of planning any large projects (such as planning processes, environmental studies, rulemakings) thereby building the public participation strategy into the life of the project;

2. Direct agencies to use at least 1% of program budgets for implementation of the directive and specify the resource needs to support public participation and collaboration including full-time positions for subject matter experts, basic education and skills training, technology tools to increase transparency, public participation and collaboration, and other capacity building needs.

3. Set standards for the amount of funding that will be dedicated to participation and collaboration activities, such as: study how participation and collaboration dollars are already being spent; provide resources and formulas that allow agencies to track savings and/or efficiency; use agency collected data to set standards.

4. Create new funding sources for participation and collaboration, such as: public-private partnerships, use attrition to shift more full-time positions to new positions that focus on using collaborative approaches and public participation strategies; develop a fund for the purpose of supporting public participation and collaboration across agencies.
Displaying 1 - 25 of 4205 Ideas

Comments Posted

shaaslyons 9 months ago
The success of national discussions will lie in the combination of engagement approaches.

Some aspects of the conversation can be held online, while some will be face to face.

The face to face methods can be very large and attended by demographically representative participants, such as AmericaSpeaks. They can be smaller and community driven like study circles. They can be filled with small, short, high energy discussions, of any group size, like conversation cafes. They can be smaller, longer and more informed like Citizens Juries. And more! For more about dialogue and deliberation methods, check out http://www.thataway.org

Online participation can be like this one, where people post, rank and comment on ideas. It can be small group oriented, where one small set of people have a conversation over time. It can be learning oriented, where individual preferences are aggregated over time. And more!

There are a plethora of proven and promising tactics to engage citizens in the most important decisions of our time.

What's important is that the government takes concrete steps to involve citizens in important decisions, like the economy, health care, immigration, energy security, foreign policy, etc.

National discussions will:
* Provide the public with a greater voice in national policy making
* Provide policy makers + agency managers with informed opinions and collective priorities
* Involve the public in being part of the solution and taking action
* Forge a stronger link between Americans and their government
* Gain unique insight into tough issues and identify new options with broad support
shaaslyons 9 months ago
Accountability is a critical aspect of these efforts, and can be achieved through a variety of mechanisms. Written reports are a tool familiar to agency managers, and can provide in-depth understanding of the agency's performance on participation, collaboration and transparency. Other types of performance measurement and scorecard systems should also be used, and, as said above, "be modified to include transparency, participation and collaboration criteria and metrics."

The other important aspect of this recommendation is a commitment by government leaders, in word and action, to the OGD. Leadership can help set a new tone and ensure expectations are met about reaching these goals of open government.
shaaslyons 9 months ago
Oversight and accountability are critical pieces of the implementation of all these open government approaches. It's critical that public resources are wisely spent, and that goals are met.

The costs of these elements could be incorporated into the 1% or applied in another part of the budget. Either way, oversight and accountability must have adequate funding.