freedomfighter4theplanet
Member since 2 years ago
9 ideas posted
148 comments 132 votes
884
points
- 0
- 408
- 0
- 136
- 340
- 0
- 0
- 0
freedomfighter4theplanet is a member of:
Activity Stream
-
Comment Posted: Depoliticizing the Mexico City Policy2 years ago
-
Comment Posted: Modern Day Morons2 years ago
-
Comment Posted: Health Care2 years ago
-
2 years ago
-
2 years ago
-
2 years ago
-
Comment Posted: Decrease Cost Of Senior Citizen Home Care / Nursing Home Care2 years ago
-
Comment Posted: Veteran Hospitals.... Health Care Reform2 years ago
-
Comment Posted: Open Up Presidential Debates to Third Parties2 years ago
-
Voted on Idea: Open Up Presidential Debates to Third Parties2 years ago
Ideas contributed by freedomfighter4theplanet
-
I agreeVoting is Disabled
-6 votes
I disagreeThis idea is active. -
I agreeVoting is Disabled
0 votes
I disagreeThis idea is closed.Records Management »Democracy Versus Republic
Democracy: A government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of "direct" expression. Results in mobocracy. ...more »
4 commentsDemocracy:
A government of the masses.
Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of "direct" expression.
Results in mobocracy.
Attitude toward property is comunistic-negating property rights.
Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate. whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences.
Results in demagogism license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.
Democracy is the "direct" rule of the people and has been repeatedly tried without success.
A certain Professor Alexander Fraser Tytler, nearly two centuries ago, had this to say about Democracy: " A Democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of Government. It can only exist until the voters discover they can vote themselves largess out of public treasury. From that moment on the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that Democracy always collapses over a loose fiscal policy, always to be followed by a Dictatorship."
A democracy is majority rule and is destructive of liberty because there is no law to prevent the majority from trampling on individual rights. Whatever the majority says goes! A lynch mob is an example of pure democracy in action. There is only one dissenting vote, and that is cast by the person at the end of the rope.
Republic:
Authority is derived through the election by the people of public officials best fitted to represent them.
Attitude toward property is respect for laws and individual rights, and a sensible economic procedure.
Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed principles and established evidence, with a strict regard to consequences.
A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be brought within its compass.
Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy. Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment, and progress.
Is the "standard form" of government throughout the world.
A republic is a form of government under a constitution which provides for the election of:
an executive and
a legislative body, who working together in a representative capacity, have all the power of appointment, all power of legislation all power to raise revenue and appropriate expenditures, and are required to create
a judiciary to pass upon the justice and legality of their governmental acts and to recognize
certain inherent individual rights.
Take away any one or more of those four elements and you are drifting into autocracy. Add one or more to those four elements and you are drifting into democracy.
Our Constitutional fathers, familiar with the strength and weakness of both autocracy and democracy, with fixed principles definitely in mind, defined a representative republican form of government. They "made a very marked distinction between a republic and a democracy and said repeatedly and emphatically that they had founded a republic."
A republic is a government of law under a Constitution. The Constitution holds the government in check and prevents the majority (acting through their government) from violating the rights of the individual. Under this system of government a lynch mob is illegal. The suspected criminal cannot be denied his right to a fair trial even if a majority of the citizenry demands otherwise.
Difference between Democracy and Republic, in brief:
Democracy:
a: government by the people; especially : rule of the majority.
b: a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections.
Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences
Republic
a: a government having a chief of state who is not a monarch and who in modern times is usually a president : a political unit (as a nation) having such a form of government.
b: a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law.
Democracy and Republic are often taken as one of the same thing, but there is a fundamental difference. Whilst in both cases the government is elected by the people, in Democracy the majority rules according to their whims, whilst in the Republic the Government rule according to law. This law is framed in the Constitution to limit the power of Government and ensuring some rights and protection to Minorities and individuals.
The difference between Republic and Righteous Republic is that in the Republic the Government rules according to the law set up by men, in the Righteous Republic the law is the Law of God. Only in the Righteous Republic it can truly be said "One nation under God" for it is governed under commandments of the only One True God and there is no pluralism of religions.
Autocracy declares the divine right of kings; its authority can not be questioned; its powers are arbitrarily or unjustly administered.
Mobocracy: 1. Political control by a mob. 2. The mass of common people as the source of political control.
« less full details »
-
I agreeVoting is Disabled
1 vote
I disagreeThis idea is closed.Uncategorized »Republic Versus Democracy
Democracy Versus Republic These succinct definitions of what is Democracy and what is a Republic was produced by the US Army in 1928, These ...more »
2 commentsDemocracy Versus Republic
These succinct definitions of what is Democracy and what is a Republic was produced by the US Army in 1928, These definitions have been quietly withdrawn since, soon after.
Democracy:
A government of the masses.
Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of "direct" expression.
Results in mobocracy.
Attitude toward property is comunistic-negating property rights.
Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate. whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences.
Results in demagogism license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.
Democracy is the "direct" rule of the people and has been repeatedly tried without success.
A certain Professor Alexander Fraser Tytler, nearly two centuries ago, had this to say about Democracy: " A Democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of Government. It can only exist until the voters discover they can vote themselves largess out of public treasury. From that moment on the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that Democracy always collapses over a loose fiscal policy, always to be followed by a Dictatorship."
A democracy is majority rule and is destructive of liberty because there is no law to prevent the majority from trampling on individual rights. Whatever the majority says goes! A lynch mob is an example of pure democracy in action. There is only one dissenting vote, and that is cast by the person at the end of the rope.
Republic:
Authority is derived through the election by the people of public officials best fitted to represent them.
Attitude toward property is respect for laws and individual rights, and a sensible economic procedure.
Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed principles and established evidence, with a strict regard to consequences.
A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be brought within its compass.
Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy. Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment, and progress.
Is the "standard form" of government throughout the world.
A republic is a form of government under a constitution which provides for the election of:
an executive and
a legislative body, who working together in a representative capacity, have all the power of appointment, all power of legislation all power to raise revenue and appropriate expenditures, and are required to create
a judiciary to pass upon the justice and legality of their governmental acts and to recognize
certain inherent individual rights.
Take away any one or more of those four elements and you are drifting into autocracy. Add one or more to those four elements and you are drifting into democracy.
Our Constitutional fathers, familiar with the strength and weakness of both autocracy and democracy, with fixed principles definitely in mind, defined a representative republican form of government. They "made a very marked distinction between a republic and a democracy and said repeatedly and emphatically that they had founded a republic."
A republic is a government of law under a Constitution. The Constitution holds the government in check and prevents the majority (acting through their government) from violating the rights of the individual. Under this system of government a lynch mob is illegal. The suspected criminal cannot be denied his right to a fair trial even if a majority of the citizenry demands otherwise.
Difference between Democracy and Republic, in brief:
Democracy:
a: government by the people; especially : rule of the majority.
b: a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections.
Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences
Republic
a: a government having a chief of state who is not a monarch and who in modern times is usually a president : a political unit (as a nation) having such a form of government.
b: a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law.
Democracy and Republic are often taken as one of the same thing, but there is a fundamental difference. Whilst in both cases the government is elected by the people, in Democracy the majority rules according to their whims, whilst in the Republic the Government rule according to law. This law is framed in the Constitution to limit the power of Government and ensuring some rights and protection to Minorities and individuals.
The difference between Republic and Righteous Republic is that in the Republic the Government rules according to the law set up by men, in the Righteous Republic the law is the Law of God. Only in the Righteous Republic it can truly be said "One nation under God" for it is governed under commandments of the only One True God and there is no pluralism of religions.
Autocracy declares the divine right of kings; its authority can not be questioned; its powers are arbitrarily or unjustly administered.
Mobocracy: 1. Political control by a mob. 2. The mass of common people as the source of political control.
« less full details »
-
I agreeVoting is Disabled
1 vote
I disagreeThis idea is closed.Legal & Policy Challenges »Democracy Versus Republic
Democracy Versus Republic These succinct definitions of what is Democracy and what is a Republic was produced by the US Army in 1928, These ...more »
2 commentsDemocracy Versus Republic
These succinct definitions of what is Democracy and what is a Republic was produced by the US Army in 1928, These definitions have been quietly withdrawn since, soon after.
Democracy:
A government of the masses.
Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of "direct" expression.
Results in mobocracy.
Attitude toward property is comunistic-negating property rights.
Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate. whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences.
Results in demagogism license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.
Democracy is the "direct" rule of the people and has been repeatedly tried without success.
A certain Professor Alexander Fraser Tytler, nearly two centuries ago, had this to say about Democracy: " A Democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of Government. It can only exist until the voters discover they can vote themselves largess out of public treasury. From that moment on the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that Democracy always collapses over a loose fiscal policy, always to be followed by a Dictatorship."
A democracy is majority rule and is destructive of liberty because there is no law to prevent the majority from trampling on individual rights. Whatever the majority says goes! A lynch mob is an example of pure democracy in action. There is only one dissenting vote, and that is cast by the person at the end of the rope.
Republic:
Authority is derived through the election by the people of public officials best fitted to represent them.
Attitude toward property is respect for laws and individual rights, and a sensible economic procedure.
Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed principles and established evidence, with a strict regard to consequences.
A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be brought within its compass.
Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy. Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment, and progress.
Is the "standard form" of government throughout the world.
A republic is a form of government under a constitution which provides for the election of:
an executive and
a legislative body, who working together in a representative capacity, have all the power of appointment, all power of legislation all power to raise revenue and appropriate expenditures, and are required to create
a judiciary to pass upon the justice and legality of their governmental acts and to recognize
certain inherent individual rights.
Take away any one or more of those four elements and you are drifting into autocracy. Add one or more to those four elements and you are drifting into democracy.
Our Constitutional fathers, familiar with the strength and weakness of both autocracy and democracy, with fixed principles definitely in mind, defined a representative republican form of government. They "made a very marked distinction between a republic and a democracy and said repeatedly and emphatically that they had founded a republic."
A republic is a government of law under a Constitution. The Constitution holds the government in check and prevents the majority (acting through their government) from violating the rights of the individual. Under this system of government a lynch mob is illegal. The suspected criminal cannot be denied his right to a fair trial even if a majority of the citizenry demands otherwise.
Difference between Democracy and Republic, in brief:
Democracy:
a: government by the people; especially : rule of the majority.
b: a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections.
Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences
Republic
a: a government having a chief of state who is not a monarch and who in modern times is usually a president : a political unit (as a nation) having such a form of government.
b: a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law.
Democracy and Republic are often taken as one of the same thing, but there is a fundamental difference. Whilst in both cases the government is elected by the people, in Democracy the majority rules according to their whims, whilst in the Republic the Government rule according to law. This law is framed in the Constitution to limit the power of Government and ensuring some rights and protection to Minorities and individuals.
The difference between Republic and Righteous Republic is that in the Republic the Government rules according to the law set up by men, in the Righteous Republic the law is the Law of God. Only in the Righteous Republic it can truly be said "One nation under God" for it is governed under commandments of the only One True God and there is no pluralism of religions.
Autocracy declares the divine right of kings; its authority can not be questioned; its powers are arbitrarily or unjustly administered.
Mobocracy: 1. Political control by a mob. 2. The mass of common people as the source of political control.
« less full details »
-
I agreeVoting is Disabled
1 vote
I disagreeThis idea is active.Uncategorized »How can we strengthen our REPUBLIC and promote efficiency and effectiveness by making government more transparent, participatory
The problem with our country is that our government thinks that we are a democracy. Look at the first paragraph of this website..."How can we ...more »
2 commentsThe problem with our country is that our government thinks that we are a democracy. Look at the first paragraph of this website..."How can we strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness by making government more transparent, participatory, and collaborative?"
Democracy Versus Republic
These succinct definitions of what is Democracy and what is a Republic was produced by the US Army in 1928, These definitions have been quietly withdrawn since, soon after.
Democracy:
A government of the masses.
Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of "direct" expression.
Results in mobocracy.
Attitude toward property is comunistic-negating property rights.
Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate. whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences.
Results in demagogism license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.
Democracy is the "direct" rule of the people and has been repeatedly tried without success.
A certain Professor Alexander Fraser Tytler, nearly two centuries ago, had this to say about Democracy: " A Democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of Government. It can only exist until the voters discover they can vote themselves largess out of public treasury. From that moment on the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that Democracy always collapses over a loose fiscal policy, always to be followed by a Dictatorship."
A democracy is majority rule and is destructive of liberty because there is no law to prevent the majority from trampling on individual rights. Whatever the majority says goes! A lynch mob is an example of pure democracy in action. There is only one dissenting vote, and that is cast by the person at the end of the rope.
Republic:
Authority is derived through the election by the people of public officials best fitted to represent them.
Attitude toward property is respect for laws and individual rights, and a sensible economic procedure.
Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed principles and established evidence, with a strict regard to consequences.
A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be brought within its compass.
Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy. Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment, and progress.
Is the "standard form" of government throughout the world.
A republic is a form of government under a constitution which provides for the election of:
an executive and
a legislative body, who working together in a representative capacity, have all the power of appointment, all power of legislation all power to raise revenue and appropriate expenditures, and are required to create
a judiciary to pass upon the justice and legality of their governmental acts and to recognize
certain inherent individual rights.
Take away any one or more of those four elements and you are drifting into autocracy. Add one or more to those four elements and you are drifting into democracy.
Our Constitutional fathers, familiar with the strength and weakness of both autocracy and democracy, with fixed principles definitely in mind, defined a representative republican form of government. They "made a very marked distinction between a republic and a democracy and said repeatedly and emphatically that they had founded a republic."
A republic is a government of law under a Constitution. The Constitution holds the government in check and prevents the majority (acting through their government) from violating the rights of the individual. Under this system of government a lynch mob is illegal. The suspected criminal cannot be denied his right to a fair trial even if a majority of the citizenry demands otherwise.
Difference between Democracy and Republic, in brief:
Democracy:
a: government by the people; especially : rule of the majority.
b: a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections.
Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences
Republic
a: a government having a chief of state who is not a monarch and who in modern times is usually a president : a political unit (as a nation) having such a form of government.
b: a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law.
Democracy and Republic are often taken as one of the same thing, but there is a fundamental difference. Whilst in both cases the government is elected by the people, in Democracy the majority rules according to their whims, whilst in the Republic the Government rule according to law. This law is framed in the Constitution to limit the power of Government and ensuring some rights and protection to Minorities and individuals.
The difference between Republic and Righteous Republic is that in the Republic the Government rules according to the law set up by men, in the Righteous Republic the law is the Law of God. Only in the Righteous Republic it can truly be said "One nation under God" for it is governed under commandments of the only One True God and there is no pluralism of religions.
Autocracy declares the divine right of kings; its authority can not be questioned; its powers are arbitrarily or unjustly administered.
Mobocracy: 1. Political control by a mob. 2. The mass of common people as the source of political control.
« less full details »
-
I agreeVoting is Disabled
15 votes
I disagreeThis idea is active.Uncategorized »10 questions about chemtrails / chem trails
1. Why isn't the American Academy of Environmental Medical [www.aaemonline.org] not looking at the impact of particulate matter, much caused ...more »
2 comments1. Why isn't the American Academy of Environmental Medical [www.aaemonline.org] not looking at the impact of particulate matter, much caused by the toxicity of Chemtrail nano-fiber-coated aluminum that we are breathing with each breath? Their scheduled October 2009 conference ["Body Under Siege: Inflammation and Autoimmunity"] does not address this urgent issue. The US Air Force has admitted using it.(3)
2. How much of human "comatose" or "denial" behavior isn't actually caused by the toxicity of this nano-fiber-coated aluminum in Chemtrails? How much of this is causing widespread cognitive troubles? Aluminum is known to cause dementia. Even in early stages, people are not thinking clearly. This is not just a one-cause issue. There are multiple causes. [See the next paragraph.] However, damage to our cognitive functioning, on a daily basis and over a decade, is already showing much odd behavior. For now, however, it is reported as anecdotal.
There is also another aspect to deteriorating cognitive functioning. Americans are poorly educated and less well-informed than Europeans. It is easy to manipulate a population through Orwellian doublespeak and (ungrounded) fear when millions get their news [read: infotainment] from a carefully orchestrated media --85% of which is controlled by five corporations. Bread and circus (as in ancient Rome) masks the rapid collapse of our country.
3. Millions (possibly billions?) of infants and young children are now afflicted with a variety of chronic upper respiratory illnesses (asthma, chronic bronchitis, hard-to-treat pneumonia). Even now, with these epidemic levels, this is not reported as such by mainstream, corporate-controlled media. Breathing is now deleterious to our health. This, in itself, speaks volumes.
Children are suffering. Why are parents not demanding answers to their childrens' illnesses caused by these environmental poisons? Pharmaceutical drugs sometimes may alleviate symptoms (or cause worse ones), but do not cure. As Bill Moyers just wrote a few days ago: "How can we expect an industry that profits from disease and sickness to police itself?"(4) Why do we not demand prevention?
4. Why isn't every citizen self-testing to see if they have Morgellons (linked to exposure to Chemtrails)? A simple mouthwash test using either organic grape juice or merlot wine would demonstrate to each of us that no one is safe from these poisons. What kind of anger and demand for the cessation of these criminal activities would ensue, if millions of American knew their bodies were infested with these poisons? How outraged would we all be then, as walking Morgellons time-bombs?(5)
5. There is a new emerging field of "environmental cardiology." How many cadiologists actually know what Chemtrails are? Why is this discipline not looking into the link between the dangerous levels of barium in Chemtrail aerosols and the dramatic increase in cardiac illnesses? Barium is known to damage the heart.(6)
6. Why are we all not demanding prevention and the Precautionary Principal (meaning: first, do not harm)? How many Americans even know what the Precautionary Principle is?
7. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Geneva Convention [the very core of international human law], and US laws all forbid the use of humans as uninformed test subjects. For our safety, why is there not a massive grassroots movement being organized to force compliance to these international laws?(7)
8. We all have a basic human right to breathe air that isn't filled with deadly brews of aerosols (targeting all mammals), chemicals, bio-weapons, and thousands of other toxins. Now we are unwitting human laboratory rats for untold government/military experiments. What is the relationship to all these multiple poisons and now epidemics of multiple chronic illnesses (auto-immune, cancers, etc.) that so many people now have?(8)
9. All mammals are also seriously being affected by the toxicity of Chemtrails. Our companion animals are suffering greatly, too. Why is the alternative veterinary community so poorly informed about Chemtrails and how it affects pets? If there are alternative Vets who do know, why are they not writing in journals, magazine, and speaking out?
10. How has more than 10 years of this daily Chemtrail assault affected the chaotic and unpredictable weather we have? Winters with extremely warm weather. Snow in June. Early Fall in August. More earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, and typhoons. Yes, humans continue to cause enormous damaged to our fragile ecosystems. Yes, mega-corporations are wrecking the entire web of life. Short-term Corporate Greed is their bottom line, not sustainability or safety. In addition, how much of "Climate Change" has truly been caused by these aerosolized metals and other toxins that are sprayed into the air? Are years of aerosol spraying of Chemtrails the cause of Climate Change?
11. Why is out planet Earth losing atmosphere, faster than Venus or Mars?(9) How is the Chemtrail/HAARP assault affecting our atmosphere in other unknown ways? The military tampering with eons-worth of our planet's regulatory systems is being damaged in ways that myopic humans cannot either comprehend or foresee. This military assault has nothing to do with safety, but all to do with supremacy behavior and plans that are endangering the entire planet and all life support systems.
12. We no longer can look up and see normal, Mother-Earth clouds that have blanketed our planet from time immemorial. Why is a synthetic cloud called "asperatus" [meaning "rough" in Latin] being considered for inclusion by the Royal Meteorological Society as a "new" cloud? Clouds are created by Nature. Chemtrail clouds are synthetic.(10) Where are any scientific Chemtrail reports from the Royal Meteorological Society?
13. Where are the REAL AND ACCURATE reports from thousands upon thousands of meteorologists reporting daily weather around the United States (and elsewhere around the globe) and the impact of synthetic Chemtrail and EMF clouds? The daily weather reports from these people are worthless and lack complete credibility without reporting the weather impact of Chemtrails. Have ALL the meteorologists been bought off or threatened? What has happened to Kevin Martin who was the only meteorologist reporting chemtrails (on his website, but now off line)?
Congress is broken. They are working for the banks and corporations. They are not working for us: "we, the people." They are no longer concerned with anything that will benefit American citizens. It is all a sham and an illusion to think that our political system is functioning at all. Writing two weeks ago, Paul Craig Roberts [author and former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury], reminded us that the corporations are ruling America.(11) Political corruption is rampant and endemic to this completely bankrupt system. Do we understand what this actually means?
« less full details »
-
I agreeVoting is Disabled
24 votes
I disagreeThis idea is active.Legal & Policy Challenges »Barack Obama - Birth - travels - fraud?
What passport did UHBAMA use when he was shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi ? How did a young man who arrived in New York in ...more »
31 commentsWhat passport did UHBAMA use when he was shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi ? How did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later??? And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi , what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration? The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers. It makes the debate over UHbama's citizenship a rather short and simple one.
Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?
A: Yes, by his own admission.
Q: What passport did he travel
under?
A: There are only three possibilities. 1. He traveled with a U.S. Passport, 2) He traveled with a British passport, or 3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport.
Q: Is it possible that UHbama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981?
A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981.
Conclusion: When UHbama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport.
If he was traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And if he was traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove that he
relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967..
Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a "natural born" American citizen between 1981 and 2008.
Given the destructive nature of his plans for America, as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better.
Count me in as one of those inquiring minds who'd at least like to know the answers to these easily answered (by UHbama) questions.
« less full details »
-
I agreeVoting is Disabled
-4 votes
I disagreeThis idea is active.Making Government Operations More Open »Unanswered Chemtrail Questions... As Evidence Mounts
Unanswered Chemtrail Questions... As Evidence Mounts ©By Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri 6-7-9 With the groundbreaking research and unswerving ...more »
1 commentUnanswered Chemtrail
Questions... As Evidence Mounts
©By Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri
6-7-9
With the groundbreaking research and unswerving personal dedication of Clifford Carnicom, Dr. Gwen Scott, and many others belonging to the various "skywatch" groups around the country, it becomes increasingly evident that the criminal aerosol Chemtrails assault to which we are continuously subjected is creating unmitigated havoc.(1)
Our immune systems are all under daily and constant siege. Here are some urgent, but unanswered questions relating to the ten-year-plus impact of possibly billions of tons of a poisonous soup of chemtrails, being sprayed on us, by military and commercial planes, for all of us to contemplate.(2) We must demand answers from officials --before our country is destroyed and a police state ensues. The window for accountability is increasingly small. Right now, all we have is a crumbling façade of deception by government officials. Connecting the dots for all of us becomes more urgent with each passing toxic day.
Look up at the sky! Really, look up. Look up frequently. Look up every day! The clouds are not real. The bizarre weather we now experience, on a daily basis, changes significantly throughout each day! Look at the planes with their deadly aerosols assaulting us! Watch how these "trails" spread and merge, and create a greyish cover over our skies. Last month, from Portland, Oregon, to Portland, Maine, I saw massive Chemtrail aerosol operations. Within a few hours, I received numerous calls from health-care providers about the spike in emergency room visits for upper respiratory problems.
None of this is natural! This level of toxicity may be mostly invisible, but it is not safe.
1. Why isn't the American Academy of Environmental Medical [www.aaemonline.org] not looking at the impact of particulate matter, much caused by the toxicity of Chemtrail nano-fiber-coated aluminum that we are breathing with each breath? Their scheduled October 2009 conference ["Body Under Siege: Inflammation and Autoimmunity"] does not address this urgent issue. The US Air Force has admitted using it.(3)
2. How much of human "comatose" or "denial" behavior isn't actually caused by the toxicity of this nano-fiber-coated aluminum in Chemtrails? How much of this is causing widespread cognitive troubles? Aluminum is known to cause dementia. Even in early stages, people are not thinking clearly. This is not just a one-cause issue. There are multiple causes. [See the next paragraph.] However, damage to our cognitive functioning, on a daily basis and over a decade, is already showing much odd behavior. For now, however, it is reported as anecdotal.
There is also another aspect to deteriorating cognitive functioning. Americans are poorly educated and less well-informed than Europeans. It is easy to manipulate a population through Orwellian doublespeak and (ungrounded) fear when millions get their news [read: infotainment] from a carefully orchestrated media --85% of which is controlled by five corporations. Bread and circus (as in ancient Rome) masks the rapid collapse of our country.
3. Millions (possibly billions?) of infants and young children are now afflicted with a variety of chronic upper respiratory illnesses (asthma, chronic bronchitis, hard-to-treat pneumonia). Even now, with these epidemic levels, this is not reported as such by mainstream, corporate-controlled media. Breathing is now deleterious to our health. This, in itself, speaks volumes.
Children are suffering. Why are parents not demanding answers to their childrens' illnesses caused by these environmental poisons? Pharmaceutical drugs sometimes may alleviate symptoms (or cause worse ones), but do not cure. As Bill Moyers just wrote a few days ago: "How can we expect an industry that profits from disease and sickness to police itself?"(4) Why do we not demand prevention?
4. Why isn't every citizen self-testing to see if they have Morgellons (linked to exposure to Chemtrails)? A simple mouthwash test using either organic grape juice or merlot wine would demonstrate to each of us that no one is safe from these poisons. What kind of anger and demand for the cessation of these criminal activities would ensue, if millions of American knew their bodies were infested with these poisons? How outraged would we all be then, as walking Morgellons time-bombs?(5)
5. There is a new emerging field of "environmental cardiology." How many cadiologists actually know what Chemtrails are? Why is this discipline not looking into the link between the dangerous levels of barium in Chemtrail aerosols and the dramatic increase in cardiac illnesses? Barium is known to damage the heart.(6)
6. Why are we all not demanding prevention and the Precautionary Principal (meaning: first, do not harm)? How many Americans even know what the Precautionary Principle is?
7. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Geneva Convention [the very core of international human law], and US laws all forbid the use of humans as uninformed test subjects. For our safety, why is there not a massive grassroots movement being organized to force compliance to these international laws?(7)
8. We all have a basic human right to breathe air that isn't filled with deadly brews of aerosols (targeting all mammals), chemicals, bio-weapons, and thousands of other toxins. Now we are unwitting human laboratory rats for untold government/military experiments. What is the relationship to all these multiple poisons and now epidemics of multiple chronic illnesses (auto-immune, cancers, etc.) that so many people now have?(8)
9. All mammals are also seriously being affected by the toxicity of Chemtrails. Our companion animals are suffering greatly, too. Why is the alternative veterinary community so poorly informed about Chemtrails and how it affects pets? If there are alternative Vets who do know, why are they not writing in journals, magazine, and speaking out?
10. How has more than 10 years of this daily Chemtrail assault affected the chaotic and unpredictable weather we have? Winters with extremely warm weather. Snow in June. Early Fall in August. More earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, and typhoons. Yes, humans continue to cause enormous damaged to our fragile ecosystems. Yes, mega-corporations are wrecking the entire web of life. Short-term Corporate Greed is their bottom line, not sustainability or safety. In addition, how much of "Climate Change" has truly been caused by these aerosolized metals and other toxins that are sprayed into the air? Are years of aerosol spraying of Chemtrails the cause of Climate Change?
11. Why is out planet Earth losing atmosphere, faster than Venus or Mars?(9) How is the Chemtrail/HAARP assault affecting our atmosphere in other unknown ways? The military tampering with eons-worth of our planet's regulatory systems is being damaged in ways that myopic humans cannot either comprehend or foresee. This military assault has nothing to do with safety, but all to do with supremacy behavior and plans that are endangering the entire planet and all life support systems.
12. We no longer can look up and see normal, Mother-Earth clouds that have blanketed our planet from time immemorial. Why is a synthetic cloud called "asperatus" [meaning "rough" in Latin] being considered for inclusion by the Royal Meteorological Society as a "new" cloud? Clouds are created by Nature. Chemtrail clouds are synthetic.(10) Where are any scientific Chemtrail reports from the Royal Meteorological Society?
13. Where are the REAL AND ACCURATE reports from thousands upon thousands of meteorologists reporting daily weather around the United States (and elsewhere around the globe) and the impact of synthetic Chemtrail and EMF clouds? The daily weather reports from these people are worthless and lack complete credibility without reporting the weather impact of Chemtrails. Have ALL the meteorologists been bought off or threatened? What has happened to Kevin Martin who was the only meteorologist reporting chemtrails (on his website, but now off line)?
Congress is broken. They are working for the banks and corporations. They are not working for us: "we, the people." They are no longer concerned with anything that will benefit American citizens. It is all a sham and an illusion to think that our political system is functioning at all. Writing two weeks ago, Paul Craig Roberts [author and former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury], reminded us that the corporations are ruling America.(11) Political corruption is rampant and endemic to this completely bankrupt system. Do we understand what this actually means?
So-called "leaders" are taking us on the fast track to the destruction of our country. Planning for a NW-Disorder, these people have no ethical or moral base. Out-of-control greed is all they know. This demonstrates the very worst of human behavior. War and destruction is profitable and growing; but all our social services safety nets are cut to the bone. This creates massive suffering and illness throughout the USA and the rest of the world. Why should our hard-earned tax dollars continue to go for lies, deceit, and epic fraudulent bailouts? If, as Bob Chapman, Paul Craig Roberts and others have written over the past week, we have a very small window [maybe only a few months] before the US economy completely collapses [how long can green toilet paper continue to be printed and countries believe these astonishing Fed lies?], it is urgent for us to WAKE UP NOW!
14. Where is the entire organic community? Where are the alternative health (both for humans and pets!) and environment communities? Where is help from MOFGA [Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association] and Oregon Tilth that certify what is supposed to be "organic"? Where are the Bioneers? Millions and millions of American spend more on organics because they are supposed to be healthier and safer. Safer than what, if the air is permeated and the soil is laden with the devastation of Chemtrails? These Chemtrail toxins are now poisoning the entire food chain, and we are at the top of it.
15. Where are the thousands of eco, peace, and environmental non-profit organizations (that haven't been infiltrated) who truly care about sustainability and a safe and peaceful future? Why are they not joining together to put a stop to this?
There are quite literally millions of citizens who belong to thousands of these different organizations. Truly, we have the ability to unite and join together in these various organizations and create a massive and peaceful grassroots movement to stop this insanity! This is for our common good. This is for today and for a viable future for our children and grandchildren growing up right now. With Chemtrails poisoning us, there is no livable future. Americans are courageous people! We can step up to the plate. We must.
WHEN YOUR RENEW YOUR YEARLY ENVIRONMENTAL MEMBERSHIP DUES, WITH IT DEMAND --RIGHT NOW-- ACCOUNTABILITY AND REAL CHANGE FOR OUR SAFETY AND PEACE! Think of the possibilities open to us with this kind of united action! A healthy population. Great social services! Communities united. Our children not going to bed hungry at night or without shelter. Children taught peace and social justice, instead of our young children going off to fight for the lies and deceit of three illegal wars. Now, thousands of them now come back in a coffin or physically and emotional wrecked for life. Is this the kind of continued violent "future" we want for our children?
Think of what these "United" States could really accomplish with peace, ethics, truth, and justice! Think of the wonderful possibilities, if our children had a real education (and knew their history) and grew up healthy! Think of what this means for our children and grandchildren! No killing. No violence. No young Boy Scouts learning to shoot so-called 'terriorists"! [What an outrage to Robert Baden Powell's vision!] No children with autism, or cancers, or auto-immune diseases, or multiple chronic illnesses, or epic obesity. No children's hospitals. Truly healthy children. No elders left alone to suffer.
I want our children and grandchildren to go out and play in real, fresh air. To be able to take deep breaths of air filled with health. I want them to play in snow that isn't laden with barium, mercury, and nano-particles of poisons filled with bioweaponized aerosols of influenza and deadly illnesses. Think on this!
Do you remember, after a Spring rain, when air smelled sweet and fresh and clean? I want our children and grandchildren to be able to dangle their feet in a mountain stream, or in a lake that isn't a deadly spew of chemicals that seeps into their skin and poisons them along with the very creatures living there. I want our children and grandchildren to look up and see REAL CLOUDS and magnificent, deep blue skies! I want our children and grandchildren to be safe and healthy! Do you?
We cannot leave any of this to the Orwellian goons and criminals in charge of the Augean Stables Beltway. Their agenda is unmitigated chaos. Is THIS what we want to leave as a legacy for our children?
I am one of the survivors of the horrific, 1-million-acre 2003 southern California FIRESTORM that destroyed my entire neighborhood of 2,000. It left an enormous swath of death and destruction in its wake. Friends, neighbors, and small children were burned to death. This nightmare was caused by 14 arsons. It was not a natural fire. Yet, no one has ever been held accountable. It was all covered up and whitewashed. The president and other public officials all lied to us. Insurance companies (for those that even had coverage) deceived us. This is the US government's modus operandi today. No one in an official capacity who could help us did. FEMA was/is worthless. The mayor in San Diego did not return calls. Neither did the governor, or senators, or congress. Supposedly (on paper), they work for us. As our representatives, the overwhelming majority of them, did not respond.
The one rare exception was California State Senator Dennis Hollingsworth who did help us. Only one official did the right thing. The rest of these people do not belong in office. Basically, for years we have been left alone to try and put some other kind of life back together. But there was almost NO social network or safety net. Deceit is rampant. Hurricanes Rita and Katrina: Nothing is fixed. Tornadoes and massive floods: Nothing is really healed. Lives are devastated, while the rich are taking EVERYTHING for which we worked so hard for decades.
In catastrophes, this is how the US functions. There are trillions of taxpayer dollars for three illegal wars and fat bailouts of our money for CEO's salaries, but a pittance for catastrophe survivors. Further, many of us are now paying increased property taxes on burned destroyed land.
Do we want to wait for FEMA to drag us off --innocent citizens-- to unknown locations on US soil to inter us in "FEMA Camps" [read: prisons], or have our military knock down our doors and assault us or cart us off to who knows where? The US government did it to Japanese citizens during World War II. The US is doing this now, detaining and brutalizing people for years and years. All of this is illegal under our Constitutional laws, now deliberately trashed. The rule of law is gone.(12) What will it take for us to wake up from our stupor?
Do we want this kind of nightmare scenario to replay itself over and overad nauseum? How long can we play the ignorant fools? Now, add on to this: the deliberately created financial debacle. Private banksters, elite insiders, and a shadow government have hijacked our economy and our livelihoods and our entire collective future. Look at the intentional havoc they have caused in such a short time! It is not just the fox watching the hen house. They are vipers.
Will you help?
We do have the ability to create a new paradigm of peace and true prosperity. War and the chronic violence that is endemic to our society can be changed. We need to truly emulate the words of Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream." We CAN create that dream!
We need to read, comprehend, and implement the works of Dr. Riane Eisler, Dr. Mae Wan-Ho, and Dr. Vandana Shiva. We need to heed the words of Dr. Rosalie Bertell.(13) These are ethical people who speak for true social justice, partnership, and peace. These are heroic people! We can emulate their visions! It is all do-able. Look around you. Search deep in your hearts. We humans have a long history of rising to the occasion under extreme circumstances. Even within a short time frame, this is possible!
It is the eleventh hour.
Think of the words of Margaret Mead: "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."
******************
Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri is the author of the critically acclaimed, "The Uterine Crisis" that London's The Ecologist calls "an inspiration."
NOTES
1. See: Clifford Carnicom's April 23, 2009, interview about his latest research with Jeff Rense: www.carnicominstitute.org/rense42309w.mp3; and Clifford Carnicom. "Blood Issues Intensify." April 22, 2009: www.carnicom.com/culture4.htm. Skywatch websites include: www.newyorkskywatch.com; www.californiaskywatch.com, www.orgeonskywatch.com, and www.arizonaskywatch.com
2. Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri "Ten Years into the Chemtrail Wars" www.rense.com /general 84/ tenyrs.htm
3. Rosalind Peterson's United Nations speech: May 21, 2007: http://newyorkskywatch.com/rosalind-peterson-speech-transcript
4. Bill Moyers and Michael Winship. "How can we expect an industry that profits from disease and sickness to police itself?" May 30, 2009. www.sott.net/articles/show/185576-Bill-Moyers-How-Can-
We-Expect-an-Industry-That-Profits-from-Disease-and-Sickness-to-Police-Itself
5. Gwen Scott, ND. "Wine/Grape Juice Mouth 'Test' for Morgellons." www.arizonaskywatch.com
6. University of Louisville: http://environmentalcardiology.louisville.edu
7. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. See: www.un.org/en/documents/udhr; Geneva Convention. See: www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/htmlall/genevaconventions
8. Multiple chronic illnesses. See: www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSTRE5050S920090106
9. Irene Klotz. Discovery News: "Earth Losing Atmosphere Faster than Venus, Mars." http://dsc.dosicerynews.com/news/2009/06/02/solar-wind-atmosphere-print.html
10. June 1, 2009: www. guardian.co.uk/environment/gallery/2009/jun/01/2?picture=348217732
11. Paul Craig Roberts. "Who Rules America?" May 18, 2009: www. rense.com/general85/robwho.htm.
12. Paul Craig Roberts. "USA no longer ruled by law."
13. Riane Eisler. Her books include: "The Partnership Way," "Tomorrow's Children," and "The Real Wealth of Nations." See: www.partnershipway.org
Dr. Mae-Wan Ho is the Director of Institute of Science in Society, www.i-sis.org.uk Her latest book is: "The Rainbow and the Worm," third edition.
Dr. Vandana Shiva is Director of the Research Foundation on Science. Her most recent books are: "Earth Democracy; Justice, Sustainability, and Peace." South End Press, 2005, and the editor for "Manifestos on the Future of Food and Seed," 2007. See: www.vandanashiva.org Dr. Rosalie Bertell is the author of "No Immediate Danger: Prognosis for a Radioactive Earth" Toronto: The Women's Press, 1985, and "Planet Earth: the Latest Weapon of War," 2000. She was the founder and past president of the International Institute of Concern of Public Health (IICPH). See: www.iich.org
« less full details »
-
I agreeVoting is Disabled
2 votes
I disagreeThis idea is active.Legal & Policy Challenges »Geo-Engineering Letter to U.S. Congress
To: U.S. Congress WE THE PEOPLE of the United States of America, pursuant to the Bill of Rights, Amendment One, which gives the right of the ...more »
1 commentTo: U.S. Congress
WE THE PEOPLE of the United States of America, pursuant to the Bill of Rights, Amendment One, which gives the right of the American people to petition the United States government for a redress of grievances, hereby state the following:
WHEREAS, unmarked aircraft are daily painting American skies with bio-hostile substances; and
WHEREAS, aircraft which carry no identifying markings can not be identified as American and are, therefore, presumed to be hostile aircraft; and
WHEREAS, these unmarked aircraft have been proven to be emitting substances which drift to the ground and are hostile to the health and well-being of American citizens;
THEREFORE, it is concluded that Americans are, and have been for years, under attack and have become the victims of BIOCHEMICAL WARFARE.
FURTHER, the United States government has allowed, and is continuing to allow, these unidentified aircraft to release harmful substances over American soil, which have been proven harmful to the American people; and
WHEREAS, the United States government has neither satisfactorily explained nor proffered any compelling reason(s) why it is in the interests of the United States government to allow harm to the majority of its people with these disease-producing, potentially lethal emissions; and
WHEREAS, when asked about the situation, the United States government has engaged in evasion, deception, and stonewalling the American people in their pursuit of the truth of this matter.
THEREFORE, it is presumed that the aircraft either belong to the United States government and are operating under the direct command and with full knowledge of the United States government or, in the alternative, the United States government has knowingly and willfully conspired with an outside, hostile group to allow harm to American citizens.
THEREFORE, it appearing that the United States government is violating numerous rights of its citizens and in so doing is in a state of treason against its citizens, it is up to the American people to exercise their rights and hold the United States government accountable for its actions or inactions, as the case may be.
CONSEQUENTLY, the people of the United States of America declare the following,
TO THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT: Pursuant to the Bill of Rights, Amendment One, we, the people of the United States, declare that we are grieved over the presence of "chemtrails" in the airspace over the United States and hereby petition the United States government to take immediate action to cease all chemtrail activity in the airspace over the United States of America.
We, the People, further DEMAND an immediate, thorough and honest investigation into what the substance called "chemtrails" actually consists of and discover the true purpose of spraying America (and its people) with harmful substances. Such investigation will include independent, impartial experts, as well as ordinary citizens.
Sincerely,
« less full details »
Social Web