GANGSTER GOVERNMENT
Is this what we want?
tsiya
Member since 3 years ago
7 ideas posted
368 comments 1695 votes
3113
points
View the Leaderboard
tsiya is a member of:
Activity Stream
-
Voted on Idea: Legitimate President?1 year ago
-
3 years ago
-
Voted on Idea: Veteran Hospitals.... Health Care Reform3 years ago
-
Comment Posted: The 2010 census should be done by postal employees.3 years ago
-
Voted on Idea: The 2010 census should be done by postal employees.3 years ago
-
3 years ago
-
Voted on Idea: Please release photos of A1 Manhattan Flyover on April 27th3 years ago
-
Comment Posted: What's driving the continued skyrocketing gun sales?3 years ago
-
Received positive feedback on Idea: GANGSTER GOVERNMENT3 years ago
-
Voted on Idea: Another broken promise?3 years ago
Ideas contributed by tsiya
-
I agree
Voting is Disabled27 votes
I disagreeThis idea is active.Making Government Operations More Open »31 comments for Idea: GANGSTER GOVERNMENT -
I agree
Voting is Disabled
17 votes
I disagreeThis idea is active.Uncategorized »What's driving the continued skyrocketing gun sales?
It began last October as citizens began to sense that the 2008 elections would bring the most anti-gun partisans to Washington in U.S. history. Their hunch was correct. November of '08 witnessed a sweep into D.C. of Senators, Congressmen, and a President that were all on record supporting strict gun control, many of whom had even supported an outright ban of all handguns in America. http://www.examiner.com/x-3704-Columbia-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m6d18-Whats-driving-the-continued-skyrocketing-gun-sales ...more »
31 comments for Idea: What's driving the continued skyrocketing gun sales?It began last October as citizens began to sense that the 2008 elections would bring the most anti-gun partisans to Washington in U.S. history. Their hunch was correct. November of '08 witnessed a sweep into D.C. of Senators, Congressmen, and a President that were all on record supporting strict gun control, many of whom had even supported an outright ban of all handguns in America.
MAKE A VOTE FOR FREEDOM!
« less full details »
-
I agree
Voting is Disabled
30 votes
I disagreeThis idea is active.Making Government Operations More Open »Senator questions firing of 3 inspectors general
He was appointed with fanfare as the public watchdog over the government's multi-billion dollar bailout of the nation's financial system. But now Neil Barofsky is embroiled in a dispute with the Obama administration that delayed one recent inquiry and sparked questions about his ability to freely investigate. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-tc-nw-inspectors-0617-0618jun18,0,5718990.story WHAT ...more »
6 comments for Idea: Senator questions firing of 3 inspectors generalHe was appointed with fanfare as the public watchdog over the government's multi-billion dollar bailout of the nation's financial system. But now Neil Barofsky is embroiled in a dispute with the Obama administration that delayed one recent inquiry and sparked questions about his ability to freely investigate.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-tc-nw-inspectors-0617-0618jun18,0,5718990.story
WHAT IS THIS ADMINISTRATION TRYING TO HIDE?
« less full details »
-
I agree
Voting is Disabled
4 votes
I disagreeThis idea is active.Uncategorized »THE BILL OF RIGHTS, DOES IT LIMIT STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT?
It is believed by some that state and local governments may choose to deny citizens the rights defined by the Bill of Rights. Should the federal government protect ALL your rights EVERYWHERE in the USA? ----------------------------------------------------- Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; ...more »
2 comments for Idea: THE BILL OF RIGHTS, DOES IT LIMIT STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT?It is believed by some that state and local governments may choose to deny citizens the rights defined by the Bill of Rights.
Should the federal government protect ALL your rights EVERYWHERE in the USA?
-----------------------------------------------------
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
« less full details »
-
I agree
Voting is Disabled
-65 votes
I disagreeThis idea is active.Uncategorized »PRESIDENT FOR LIFE?
9 comments for Idea: PRESIDENT FOR LIFE?Earlier this year, Rep. Jose Serrano, D-N.Y. Introduced H. J. Res. 5, a bill that would repeal The Constitution’s 22nd Amendment which prohibits a president from being elected to more than two terms in office, thus potentially paving the way to make Barack Obama president for life.
-
I agree
Voting is Disabled
70 votes
I disagreeThis idea is active.Uncategorized »THIS IS A REPUBLIC
Any constitutional limit on government power either extends to state and local governments, or none do. Picking and choosing which articles of the Bill of Rights will be respected must stop! Sonia Sotomayor does not believe that the 2nd amendment applies to state and local government, she is wrong about this, or does not care what the law means. The Constitution is the law of the nation, it is the protective shield ...more »
7 comments for Idea: THIS IS A REPUBLICAny constitutional limit on government power either extends to state and local governments, or none do. Picking and choosing which articles of the Bill of Rights will be respected must stop!
Sonia Sotomayor does not believe that the 2nd amendment applies to state and local government, she is wrong about this, or does not care what the law means.
The Constitution is the law of the nation, it is the protective shield between each American citizen and government, and between each American citizen and the excesses of democracy.
Tyranny by government is no worse than tyranny by popular vote, both are evil!
The Founders knew this to be true, it is why they formed a REPUBLIC!
« less full details »
-
I agree
Voting is Disabled
32 votes
I disagreeThis idea is active.Uncategorized »DOOMSDAY PROVISION
"The prospect of tyranny may not grab the headlines the way vivid stories of gun crime routinely do. But few saw the Third Reich coming until it was too late. The Second Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances where all other rights have failed--where the government refuses to stand for reelection and silences those who protest; where courts have lost the courage to oppose, ...more »
7 comments for Idea: DOOMSDAY PROVISION"The prospect of tyranny may not grab the headlines the way vivid stories of gun crime routinely do. But few saw the Third Reich coming until it was too late. The Second Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances where all other rights have failed--where the government refuses to stand for reelection and silences those who protest; where courts have lost the courage to oppose, or can find no one to enforce their decrees. However improbable these contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free people get to make only once".
Judge Alex Kozinsky
« less full details »
Social Web