Open Government Dialogue
« Back To OpenGov - Open Government Brainstorm

susan

User Profile Image susan
Member since : Jun-01-2009 (Verified)
0 Ideas, 4 Comments, 762 Votes

User Activity Stream

Comments Posted

susan 9 months ago
Absolutely!

And have a non-partisan eligibility test created and agreed to by both sides, to test for at least BASIC knowledge of the issues we are voting on!
susan 9 months ago
I agree with previous comment but also say voters should be TESTED as to their at least basic knowledge of what the representatives they vote for stand for or the laws they vote for are about, with a non-partisan test required to prove eligibility to vote.

This is the comment I agree with:

If a person is on gov't assistance for a certain period of time they should lose the right to vote until they have been off assistance for a specified amount of time otherwise it is no different than buying votes. This is known as conflict of interest!!! If they get a regular check every month and don't have to work for it then who do you think they will vote for. PAYING FOR VOTES!!
susan 9 months ago
"There appears a concerted effort to vote down single payer. conservatives have invaded this web site and have registered on jun 1 and voted single payer actions listed on this web site. they appear organized."

Single payer? Can I vote against that sham idea here too? Thanks for pointing it out - I will do that now too!

I HOPE we're getting organized! Idiots who think money grows on trees and that they can scam Americans with redistribution schemes will eventually awaken those who actually understand economics and know history! Single payer defies logic - it has not and will not work.
susan 9 months ago
This is looking like the most idiotic and least transparent administration ever.