Open Government Dialogue
« Back To OpenGov - Open Government Brainstorm

bushman_dread

User Profile Image bushman_dread
Member since : Jun-01-2009 (Verified)
1 Ideas, 8 Comments, 19 Votes

User Activity Stream

Ideas Posted

Why should Americans believe you are genuine on the subject of "transparency" when you have spent nearly a million dollars to keep records concealed which would, according to your supporters (and you, presumably), prove that you are a natural-born U.S. citizen, and therefore eligible to hold the office you occupy? Unless there is information on those various documents, COMPLETE birth certificate, your college admission and grant/loan applications, and your passport application records, which would prove that you were NOT a natural-born citizen, then why would you go to such lengths to conceal that information? It makes no logical or rational sense, which suggests you are devious and deceptive.
Displaying 1 - 25 of 4205 Ideas
12345678910….168169Next »

Comments Posted

bushman_dread 9 months ago
halinator11
I don't know the percentages, but some do get jobs. It has been known for decades though that there is "generational welfare". A repetitive cycle of the children of welfare recipients growing up and going on welfare themselves, sometimes with never having had a job. As for taking over large nations, it requires less brain cells than it does armed enforcement at one's disposal. China and Chairman Mao are examples of hard-core Communism. There's good reason it has never worked to any credible extent, and never will. Obama and Liberals in America believe they can make it work here simply because they would starting off with a lot of "money in the bank"....Enough goods and established manufacturing to bribe and coerce people into accepting it.
bushman_dread 9 months ago
sboyd8071
What you're talking about requires world-wide Communism. Your thoughts may be well-intended, but you presume epople will work for little or nothing just as hard as they'll work to provide themselves and their family a more bountiful and comfortable living. They won't. I won't. You also presume that everyone WILL work. They won't. We do what he can and are willing to do to help other people, but those who aren't willing to work and help themselves don't deserve help. Short of Obama-Pelosi-Reid-Frank "redistribution of wealth" Socialism (Communism-lite), we can't provide what you wish for every legal, deserving AMERICAN citizen. Again, your thoughts may be well-intended, but they are also incredibly naive and Utopianistic. We do not owe the world a living, and even God doesn't expect us to provide comfort for the lazy and undeserving.
bushman_dread 9 months ago
jones_geoff
Sounds like the grand plan of Chairman Mao. Curious that even the Chinese are losing interest in Communism.
bushman_dread 9 months ago
There are of course many factors to consider in individual cases, but in addition to what you've suggested there are some other sensible proposals. OPne would be that when a person applies for benefits (this could apply to a single mother or a married couple), it should be determined whther or not the woman is pregnant. It should be policy that if a woman gets pregnant after she has been approved for benefits, there will no increase if she has another child.
There should also be a concerted, deliberate effort to put an end to generatoional welfare. There are some areas where benefits should be increased, such as some allowance for a parent working and earning some wages without losing benefits. If we want people to make an effort to find work, but all they can get is a minimum wage job, byt the time they pay for childcare and transportation, they'd have less ability to support their family than they would on welfare.
The system needs a TOTAL overhaul.
bushman_dread 9 months ago
The only reason we would need more immigration is because we have disdained credible education in American schools in deference to political correctness and the Liberal notion that if we hold any high expectations of our own children we may hurt their itty-bitty feelings. It's a mentality of surrender to graduate our children from High School through "social promotion", and then search foreign soil for future employees who are a little smarter than a rock.
What person with a reasonable facsimile of a brain thinks we're doing our children a favor by catering to THEIR ideas of what's relevant? By indoctrinating them with lying propaganda about the history of their Nation and the principles and values it was founded on, and encouraging them to become sexually active with the further lie that "condoms allow safe sex"? "WE" are the ones who created this pathetic dearth of intellect and true academia. The first step in correcting the situation is to admit that teaching political correctness and moral releativism was wrong.
What you're proposing is simply FURTHER surrender and further marginalization of our own children.
bushman_dread 9 months ago
Michael
Are you a moron? Snopes.com references FactCheck as the source of their information, and FactCheck references the online digital representation of the short-form Certification of Live Birth. Hawaii code 338 authorizes the issuance of a COLB to Hawaiian residents whose child was born in another country. For you to stipulate Snopes as a reliable, definituve source establishing Obama's being a natural born citizen is like excusing an accused liar based on his assurance that he's telling the truth. You are either unaware or ununterested in what constitutes credibility.
bushman_dread 9 months ago
kdtroxel
Q1: WorldNetDaily for one. If you're alluding to the likes of supposed "news agencies" like CNN, MSNBC, et al, not advocating the idea, that would be tantamount to Obama himself declaring that he may not be eligible.
Q2: The Supreme Court can not be faulted until they hear the case, allow discovery, and THEN refuse to act. Meanwhile, they're doing a good job of keeping it off the docket so it doesn't HAVE to be heard.
Q3: Not that I'm aware of, but "we" have started putting up billboards that ask "Where's the birth certificate?" The first one is up in Louisiana, with more in the works.
Q4: There is no one organization. Liberals would wish that were the case, then Obama could just shut them down. There are several organizations involved, but this is mainly individuals who want to see some evidence that Obama is eligible, and this being perfectly reasonable considering the lengths he has gone to to conceal information and documents which PRESUMABLY would vindicate him. Of course Liberal's notions of "operative principles" is irrational and comvoluted to say the least.

There are also those among "us" who are not exactly thrilled with the Patriot Act either. In any case, you won't be allowed to attempt to confuse the issue with smoke and mirrors or comparing apples to oranges in MY postings without being called down on it.
bushman_dread 9 months ago
Tax Payer & Civil Servant
I doubt paper forms of some documents will cease to be issued, but that would be an issue for the future. If Obama has a full, vaulted borth certificate from 1961, it is most assuredly on paper.
info
I'm not a Republican, and as a matter of perspective I think it's entirely credible to say that Dr. Tiller had a sunstantial part in creating the climate that got him killed, as did Leftist Liberals who wanted babies to be killed....and don't try to deny that Liberals are mainly the ones who advocate killing babies for frivolous reasons. Obama, and others, even advocate for killing them AFTER they have been born alive. Documented fact.
All of this not-with-standing, I always find it interesting that the people who are so adamantly in favor of criminalizing "hate speech" have at least as great a propensity for hatefulness as those they vilify for it. Hypocrites much.