I agreeto Idea Solar covered parking
Voting is Disabled

28 votes

I disagree

Rank1706

Idea#3693

This idea is active.
Uncategorized »

Solar covered parking

Why Is This Idea Important?: This is an important idea for several reasons. -It leaves land free for other uses besides solar arrays -It provides a valuable service (covered parking and possible charging sttions) for citizens in hot climates. -It helps toward energy independence. -It provides jobs in the area of alternative energies -Will help to push solar technology to become more efficient if there is a large scale use for it.

I live in a part of the country where we have 300 days of sunlight a year. In the summer it is blazing hot and large areas of the ground are set aside of parking lots.

It would make sense, in my eyes, to use these areas for solar arrays. Right now when I see a solar aray it is covering a large area of open land which could be used for farming, grazing, or many other possibilites. Leave that land and use the large parking lots for solar arrays.

This is not a viable option for much of the country, but states such as Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, and Colorado would be ideal candidates.

Not only does this free up land for other uses, but it provides shaded parking for patrons of the parking area. Cars and the asphalt itself can be blazing hot on a summer day and a shaded parking spot is always coveted. As electric cars become more prominent a parking meter-like charging station could be incorporated into the system as well. $.50 an our or something similar to plug your car in while it is in the lot.

A quick look at Phoenix or many other cities in these hot regions on google maps will show how much land is covered by black asphalt parking lots. Why not do a public service for citizens and work toward energy independence by covering them?

Edit: I failed to mention in my original writing that this energy could be fed into the national power grid, benefitting the entire country with a natural resource produced in a small area. It would be most beneficial in the summer months which is good because that is when things lik A/C use have cause issues with national power infrastructure. This power would be most available when it was most needed and could benefit anyone in the continental U.S..

Submitted by jason 3 years ago

Vote Activity Show

Similar Ideas Show

Comments (7)

  1. "This is not a viable option for much of the country, but states such as Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, and Colorado would be ideal candidates."

    And you think that citizens of Vermont should pay for it?

    I am so sick of liberals.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  2. I think it is an excellent suggestion. It is at the core. Change the thinking of how things are usually done. Spot on!

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  3. I Jason's thinking outside of the box thinking too. Solar & Windmill pwr generation isn't the total, and long term solution or replacement for hydrocarbon fuels, but it can be a supplement in some areas, and at some times.

    IF Fedzilla keeps/extends their finger in the Solar & Windmill power generation business (and they will) some consideration might be given to utilizing the medians and right of ways along our interstate highway systems. This land has already been eminently domained. Maybe it can't provide all of the space that might be required, but it's another way of using land the Gov't already owns/controls vs further tenacle extention of the hydra.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  4. EDIT 1st sentence: "I LIKE" Jason's idea/thinking.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  5. I've heard that solar panels can work even on a cloudy day. But consider this, if we start in one area of the country where they are most effective that frees up resources for those areas of the country that they are not as effective, so it benefits even the citizens of Vermont because there would be more coal or oil available for them as those of us in the sunny states wouldn't need as much.

    Furthermore, as people make a profit off of the panels, that makes money for research into tech that would work even in Vermont.

    Conservatives think only in the short term and are so selfish.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  6. Why? Because the payoff is longer than the life of the panels. If it was cost effective more people would use them. Just look at the military base that was converted to solar. It is COSTING the tax payers millions of dollars per year. The payoff is like twenty years. The only problem is the life expectancy of the system is only 10 years. Good job my governmnet is doing. Chalk another one up to the eletsit idiots in D.C.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  7. HEY PRESIDENT OBAMA, CHECK THIS IDEA OUT! It is original. It is doable. It is good. How soon can you get started?

    3 years ago
    0
    0