I agreeto Idea RESULTS OF THE AMERICAN FREEDOM OF SPEECH TEST
Voting is Disabled

17 votes

I disagree

Rank2219

Idea#3466

This idea is active.
Making Data More Accessible »

RESULTS OF THE AMERICAN FREEDOM OF SPEECH TEST

Why Is This Idea Important?: In the end, we all have the Freedom Of Speech given to us in our U.S. Constitution. I really think every American should make a copy of the Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of Rights and read them all. Americans have forgotten their rights in America. I am shocked and deeply ashamed that my fellow Americans would take away their fellow man's Freedom of Speech rights for speaking their mind. But, they don't hesitate to make some very unseemly, rude, unConstitutional comments, unAmerican,and downright mean comments to that very person that offended them. It goes both ways Americans. Know your rights in America, read them Americans. Try to be more tolerant and kinder to your fellow American, even if you don't like their comments or opinions in their posts. We all have our own opinions, and the right to them.

I just wanted to share with all of you the results of my Freedom of Speech test. In just 2 days I got responses from a number of you on my previous posts. I knew if I said, do not send me a response, that you would do exactly that for my test. I took some information that I found in a number of different posts on the internet, and I put them into a couple of New Idea posts. Issues talked about several times over by different Americans across the nation. I found most Americans are very blunt to speak their minds on internet posts, that is why I did the same in my test posts. I combined some wrong information and correct information together. I needed to get a response, and honest reaction, from all of you, and it worked like a charm. I knew this would be the perfect platform to get the information I needed for the test.

I found that:

79% of Americans would suppress his fellow man's freedom of speech rights in America.

89% thought the posts offensive, and had some very unAmerican, rude, and abusive things to say in return to a complete stranger.

55% agreed with part of the content to a certain extent.

97% of Liberals just can't stand to be called names by a complete stranger, but don't hesitate to call that stranger a few names, or even threaten that person themselves, in their responses. This shows the severe lack of tolerance, and the abusive nature of the Liberal party, towards their fellow man.

34% of Conservatives thought it was funny to make fun of Liberals.

45% thought I was crazy and should be locked up.

67% agreed with part of the content in the post, but pointed out the wrong information, and some of the offense language or content.

90% of Conservatives were kinder in their responses to my posts, but critical of my language and wrong content. This shows the higher morals and values are still in place in the Conservative party is still true. Treat your fellow man as you would want to be treated, but point out where they are wrong in their thinking or information.

62% of Americans threatened me in one form or another. We are getting to be either a Big Brother, intolerate, and a violent nation.

17% of Conservatives thought my content was racist, or called me a racist.

96% of Liberals thought my content was racist, or called me a racist.

Word from the tester: My mom gave me some very good advice years ago with I was a young girl. I have tried to live by it ever since. But I research all the time, and the blogs and posts I see daily really opened up my eyes as to how much America has changed in the last 50 years.

The information my mom told me was this:

Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.

If you don't have something good to say about someone, keep it to yourself.

I see for the most part the Conserative ideals are still in place.

The Liberal ideals have changed for the worst. The Liberal Progressive movement is ruining our great nation, and its ideals of Freedom and Rights.

Thank you for participating in the Freedom of Speech test. I hope it opened up your eyes also on the information I found, just like it did mine.

Submitted by janine39 3 years ago

Vote Activity Show

Comments (22)

  1. Go see a doctor. That's no name-calling. I mean it. You need professional help.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  2. Your findings are often repeated by anyone who investigates those who call themselves liberal. "97% of Liberals just can't stand to be called names by a complete stranger, but don't hesitate to call that stranger a few names, or even threaten that person themselves, in their responses. This shows the severe lack of tolerance, and the abusive nature of the Liberal party, towards their fellow man."

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  3. Thanks Janine 39. The hate and distrust taught to the leftists by the socialists and marxists taking over the young and not so young is disgusting. Their ends justifies any means is truly unAmerican and definately not from our Judeo Christian heritage.

    Pray and vote the failed socialists and their policies out.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  4. "If you don't have something good to say about someone, keep it to yourself." You do understand that if we don't say something bad about what needs to be spoke bad of, our justice system would be a bigger failure than it already is. How would we know who to trust if somebody wouldn't have warned us first. Our media is living by that rule as it pertains to Obama and look at what that has done for us.

    Go tell your mother she was wrong on that one.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  5. No. Just pray. Liberal ideas like democracy don't have anything to do with a state, where Jesus and his fellow believers know what to do. Voting is for heathens only. Everyone else let God decide! And pray for our rotten souls, too. Please. And don't forget to use "socialist" and "marxist" twice every sentence. It proves you have heard of it. And please forgive us. Because if you can't who else can?

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  6. I think it's interesting that you conducted this type of test/research. Don't let those naysayers get you down. Your findings reflect reality, whether the respondants like it or not! Empirical data is difficult to argue with, though some will try.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  7. The data gathered only relfects those that have the internet and care to find a political webite to read and or voice their opinions...there is so much more to a scientific poll than what was gathered here...nice try though.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  8. Big Rooster- you do realize that this post is a complement to conservatives, right? I've seen you do a good bit of liberal bashing over the last few days, and I guess I thought you were of the conservative persuasion...

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  9. I PUT THIS TEST ON SEVERAL DIFFERENT WEBSITES AND THIS WAS THE OUTCOME OF ALL OF THEM COMBINED. IF YOU DON'T LIKE THE RESULTS, THAT IS JUST A SHAME. CAN'T BLIND THE TRUTH OF THE ANSWERS I GOT JUST FOR ONE PERSON OR ONE PARTY. I SEE IT AS I RECEIVED THEM AND NOTHING MORE. I DIDN'T THINK ANY LIBERALS WOULD LIKE THE RESULTS OF THIS TEST AFTER I SAW THE OUTCOME MYSELF. I MYSELF AM A DEMOCRAT. I WANTED TO SEE WHAT TYPE OF RESULTS I WOULD GET ON SUCH A TEST. THE RESULTS ARE THE RESULTS, I DIDN'T SUGAR COAT THEM, IT PUT THEM ON HERE AS I GOT THEM, NOTHING MORE.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  10. Why Is This Idea Important?

    In the end, we all have the Freedom Of Speech given to us in our U.S. Constitution. I really think every American should make a copy of the Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of Rights and read them all. Americans have forgotten their rights in America. I am shocked and deeply ashamed that my fellow Americans would take away their fellow man's Freedom of Speech rights for speaking their mind. But, they don't hesitate to make some very unseemly, rude, unConstitutional comments, unAmerican,and downright mean comments to that very person that offended them. It goes both ways Americans. Know your rights in America, read them Americans. Try to be more tolerant and kinder to your fellow American, even if you don't like their comments or opinions in their posts. We all have our own opinions, and the right to them.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  11. janine39, I am very sorry or sounding like an ass in that post. I didn't mean to try to roast you like that. I do think it is a good idea to look into those types of stats.

    I know better than to act like that. I was venting on the wrong person that it for sure. I do respect you and your taking the time to do that kind of work.

    I hope you accept my public apology.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  12. I wonder how your and other posters define a liberal. I might fit in some situations. as well in moderate and conservative in others as well. I think in a fair amount of cases there are cross overs for what ever reason. Please if you have the time offer you thought on what a liberal is. My own definition is that liberal means "wide open" to the topic at hand, but because one is wide open on one issue they could be the reverse on another and not "liberal" at all. In politics words sometimes change meaning, perhaps liberal is one of those words?

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  13. I'm interested in that "62% of Americans threatened me in one form or another." Did you break that down into liberal and conservative? Why or why not?

    One thing you're displaying is very black-and-white thinking. The world is far more complex than "liberal vs. conservative". Even if you accept the simplistic "left-right" political paradigm, it's a line, not two points. There's a center and every variation between the extremes.

    A better paradigm is the two-dimensional model with "personal freedom" on one axis and "economic freedom" on the other, promoted by the libertarians. The reality, of course, is far more complex than that. An accurate model would require a separate dimension for each issue.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  14. BTW, thanks for this. I was beginning to think the whole site was nothing but "Show us the birth certificate" spam.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  15. Most folks simply vote up or down, and those that respond are the ones that more often feel passion on their side of the issue, whether in offence or defense, and might often wrongly feel that namecalling somehow strenthens their stated point? People in general do not go fist first in in-person commuication, but when they can hide in a made-up name in a blogg atmostphere they can become bullies? They are not always themselves.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  16. Below please find a special message from one of our advertisers, United States Justice Foundation. From time to time, we receive opportunities we believe you as a valued customer may want to know about. Please note that the following message does not necessarily reflect the editorial positions of Human Events.

    Dear Friend of the Constitution,

    Update on The biggest political cover up in American history

    Worse than Watergate, Whitewatergate, or any of the other cover ups of previous administrations, is the question of whether Barack Hussein Obama is eligible to serve as President of the United States of America... OR, is he a FRAUD, a USURPER, a man with no legal authority to sit in the position that he now claims to hold?

    Barack Obama could simply put the issue to rest RIGHT NOW by releasing his ACTUAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE! But he WON'T! Instead, he has had teams of attorneys all over the country, fighting "tooth and nail" to thwart the efforts of the United States Justice Foundation (USJF), and our allies in a number of states, to compel him to produce an ACTUAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE and to prove that he is Constitutionally eligible to serve as President of these United States!

    HELP US EXPOSE THE OBAMA COVER-UP -- DON'T LET HIM

    RIP OUR CONSTITUTION TO SHREDS!

    Ohio, Mississippi, Hawaii, and California! These are the states where USJF has been involved in lawsuits seeking an answer to this critical constitutional question!

    And now, in California, just like in every lawsuit filed over this issue, the Obama team of attorneys, working with liberal allies in the office of California Attorney General Jerry Brown, has convinced a Sacramento County Superior Court judge to dismiss USJF's suit to force the truth to come out about whether Barack Obama is a "natural born" citizen, and, therefore, eligible to serve as President of the United States.

    BUT WE'RE NOT GIVING UP! Our clients in this case, including 2008 candidate for President of the United States, Alan Keyes, have given USJF the go ahead to file an appeal of this decision!

    AND THAT'S WHAT WE ARE GOING TO DO -- BUT WE NEED YOUR HELP TO DO IT!

    HELP US EXPOSE THE OBAMA COVER-UP -- DON'T LET HIM

    RIP OUR CONSTITUTION TO SHREDS!

    A number of apologists for Barack Obama have gone to great lengths to belittle USJF and our allies in the fight to preserve our Constitution. However, the questions that they cannot answer are:

    If Barack Hussein Obama has nothing to hide, WHY doesn't he just make his real birth certificate public? WHY has he spent a almost $900,000.00 in attorney fees, for, among other things, fighting USJF's efforts to obtain his ACTUAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE? The more that he fights these efforts to see this document, the more that you have to wonder, WHY?

    Obama supporters want everyone to believe that only "fringies," the people that they now call "birthers," in other words, only people that they claim are outside of the main stream of thinking, question whether Mr. Obama is truly eligible to serve as President of the United States of America. But the truth of the matter is that more and more people, including many federal, state, and local elected officials, AND many in the military, are questioning whether Barack Hussein Obama is, indeed, a "natural born citizen," a Constitutional requirement for him to serve as President of these United States.

    The citizens of this country have the right to know if Barack Obama is, indeed, eligible to serve as President! And we here at the United States Justice Foundation are going to take our lawsuit all the way up to the United States Supreme Court, if that is what is necessary, to find out the answer to this critical question.

    This fight to discover the truth will be neither easy nor inexpensive, but isn't protecting the Constitution worth it? And that is exactly what this legal battle is all about,

    PROTECTING THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION!

    HELP US EXPOSE THE OBAMA COVER-UP -- DON'T LET HIM

    RIP OUR CONSTITUTION TO SHREDS!

    Barack Obama wants you to ignore what he is doing, he wants you to ignore the U.S. Constitution, he wants you to think that the parts of the Constitution that he does not agree with (like the requirements to serve as President) are unimportant.

    In effect, he wants to destroy the U. S. Constitution and reshape this country into his own image of what he wants it to be.

    And Barack Obama's attorneys have now taken another big step to destroy the Constitution of the United States -- this time in a California State Court. Those attorneys, working with liberal California State Attorney General Jerry Brown, convinced the Judge in our case to rule that only Members of Congress can challenge the qualifications of Mr. Obama, or any candidate, to serve as President.

    And, the Judge further ruled that such a challenge could only be made on the 6th day of January following the meeting of the Presidential electors, at the session of Congress where the vote of the Electoral College is counted and the results announced. To use the Judge's words, this is "the exclusive means for challenges to the qualifications of President..."

    That means that no one, except a Member of Congress, and only on one certain day of the year following the Presidential election, can challenge the qualifications of a President-Elect! And then, the challenge can only be successful if a majority of the Members of Congress support the challenge! And that means that the politicians, not the people, are in control of who becomes President if there is an eligibility issue!

    Is that what you want? Do you believe that the majority party in both Houses of Congress should be deciding who is eligible to serve as President? Do you want Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi, or Harry Reid deciding who is President?

    That means that the requirements of the U. S. Constitution as to the eligibility of the man or woman who runs for President to serve as President are meaningless!

    Do you believe that the Constitution is a meaningless document? Do you believe that a majority of the Members of Congress have the right to ignore it? To render it of no force and effect?

    The Trial Court Judge in our case did! But we are not going to accept his decision. We are not going to accept the legal arguments made by Barack Hussein Obama's attorneys, and those by attorneys from liberal California Attorney General Jerry Brown. We are going to keep fighting this monumentally important legal battle all the way up to the United States Supreme Court, if that is what is necessary.

    IT'S A BATTLE THAT WE MUST FIGHT!

    IT'S A BATTLE THAT WE MUST WIN!

    IT'S A BATTLE THAT WILL DECIDE WHETHER THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL REMAIN A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC, OR WHETHER WE WILL JOIN THE DUST HEAP OF HISTORY AS JUST ANOTHER FAILED EXPERIMENT!

    USJF IS IN A BATTLE THAT COULD CHANGE THE HISTORY OF OUR GREAT COUNTRY! -- but we need YOUR help to WIN!

    IT'S A BATTLE TO SAVE OUR CONSTITUTION!

    IT'S A BATTLE TO SAVE OUR COUNTRY!

    HELP US EXPOSE THE OBAMA COVER-UP -- DON'T LET HIM

    RIP OUR CONSTITUTION TO SHREDS!

    We MUST learn the truth about whether Barack Obama is a "natural born citizen!

    But to blunt our efforts to learn the truth, the Trial Court also blocked our subpoena for the college records of Mr. Obama! These vital records could have proven whether Barack Hussein Obama is eligible to serve as President of the United States, or whether he is a USURPER, a FRAUD, sitting in the oval office without any legal authority to do so!

    What is in those records? We do not know. But the Obama legal team pulled out all of the stops to block the subpoena, so we believe that there is something in those college records that bears on the critical issue of whether Barack Obama is eligible to serve as President of the United States.

    JUST LIKE WE BELIEVE THAT THERE IS A REASON WHY THE OBAMA LEGAL TEAM, ACCORDING TO A PUBLISHED REPORT, HAS BEEN PAID OVER $800,000.00, and as much as almost $900,000.00, TO KEEP THE PUBLIC FROM SEEING HIS REAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE -- NOT THE PHONEY ONE THAT HE PUT UP ON HIS WEBSITE.

    There is no doubt in my mind that this e-mail may be the one of the most important documents that you ever read!

    What you do after reading this e-mail may well determine the fate of the United States of America!

    Please know that we are not saying that Barack Hussein Obama is not eligible to serve as President of the United States of America. The problem is we just do not know!

    We do know that Barack Obama's maternal step-grandmother has proclaimed that she was present at his birth in Mombasa, in what is now Kenya, in Africa!

    We do know that a fake birth certificate was put up on Obama's website!

    We do know that Mr. Obama's legal team is doing everything that it can, in every case filed over this issue; to make sure that no one has access to his birth certificate.

    We do know that Mr. Obama's legal team is doing everything that it can, in our California case; to make sure that no one has access to his college records.

    DON'T LET THEM GET AWAY WITH IT!

    HELP US EXPOSE THE OBAMA COVER-UP -- DON'T LET HIM

    RIP OUR CONSTITUTION TO SHREDS!

    The voters of the United States of America have the right to know whether Barack Obama is a "natural born citizen," as REQUIRED by the U. S. Constitution!

    It's a question that MUST be answered!

    Why? Because, if an unqualified person was elected to the Office of President of the United States, our entire form of government could be compromised!

    Why?

    Because, if Barack Hussein Obama is not eligible to serve as President of the United States, each and every act that he takes as President will be null and void! That's right, each bill that he signs into law, every Executive Order that he issues, and each and every one of his nominations to his Cabinet and to the federal courts will have no legal effect!

    I don't make that statement lightly. It's not an exaggeration.

    Article 2, Section 1, Clause 4 of the United States Constitution provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "No Person except a natural born Citizen... shall be eligible to the Office of President..."

    That means that neither Osama Bin Laden, nor California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, nor Obama billionaire money man George Soros can serve as President of the United States. That also means that if Barack Obama was born outside of the United States, he is not eligible to serve as President of our great country!

    So where was Mr. Obama born?

    He claims to have a copy of his birth certificate. That means that either he knows where he was born, or he's lying about having that document.

    And only Barack Hussein Obama's ACTUAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE can answer that question of where he was born. But he has teams of attorneys, all across the country, spending, and doing, whatever it takes to make sure that no one, and I mean NO ONE, will be allowed to see the one document that can clear up this controversy

    Mr. Obama has claimed that his Presidential administration will be the most transparent in history. Yet, he will not make public the one document that could end all of the questions about the legitimacy of his election as President.

    And you have to ask yourself, WHY?

    Is it because this is some unimportant "technicality"? No, a requirement of the U. S. Constitution is not a mere "technicality"!

    Is it because "President" Obama (if he is the President of the United States) has more important issues to deal with, and can't spare the time to deal with such a trivial issue? No, what is more important than the integrity of the Office of the President?

    Or, is there something more involved?

    Another question that the Obamaphiles don't want to answer is why, in 2005, was a law firm with ties to Mr. Obama researching the question as to how to evade the requirements of Article II of the United States Constitution, regarding the requirements to serve as President. 2005? Three years before the Presidential campaign?

    If that doesn't raise questions in your mind, then nothing will!

    And then there's the statements made by representatives of the State of Hawaii!

    According to Dr. Chiyome Fukino, of the State of Hawaii's Department of Health,

    "Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawaii, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obama's original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures."

    Exactly what does that mean? If she can access it, why can't we? It is that very record that USJF financed lawsuits in Mississippi and in Hawaii were seeking to force into the public arena! But Obama's attorneys, and his allies in state government, stopped those efforts cold!

    So, the time of decision is now!

    Do we give up?

    Do we just ignore this threat to our Constitution? To our very form of government?

    We here at USJF say NO!

    Now is not the time to give up this fight!

    Now is not the time to walk away from the most important Constitutional battle in our lifetime!

    Now is the time to redouble our efforts to find out the truth!

    Now is the time to tell Barack Hussein Obama that the United States Constitution is far more important than his political ambition!

    But we can only do this with your help! With your financial support, and with the financial support of everyone that you know!

    HELP US EXPOSE THE OBAMA COVER-UP -- DON'T LET HIM

    RIP OUR CONSTITUTION TO SHREDS!

    Will you stand with us?

    Sincerely,

    Gary Kreep, Executive Director

    United States Justice Foundation

    P.S. This is the biggest political cover-up in American history! It would be so simple to release the documents to PROVE Obama is a natural-born citizen... IF THEY HAD THE DOCUMENTS!

    Barack Hussein Obama thinks he can get away with DUPING the American people and DESTROYING the U.S. Constitution. DON'T LET HIM DO IT!

    HELP US EXPOSE THE OBAMA COVER-UP -- DON'T LET HIM

    RIP OUR CONSTITUTION TO SHREDS!

    To donate by check, please mail to:

    United States Justice Foundation

    National Processing Center

    PO Box 131637

    Dept Code 2513

    Houston, TX 77219-1637

    The United States Justice Foundation (USJF) is a non-profit organization, whose tax-exempt status under IRS section 501(c)(3) has been recognized by the Internal Revenue Service. Your contributions are tax deductible. Corporate contributions may be accepted.

    UNSUBSCRIBE: From time to time we find special opportunities we believe you as a valued customer may want to see. This email was sent to phylmike34@aol.com because you are subscribed to Eagle Publishing's Carefully Selected Offers from 3rd Parties email list. Click here to update your email preferences or unsubscribe. Please do not attempt to respond to this message as your reply will route to an unattended email box. If you have questions, please send them to CustomerService@HumanEventsOnline.com.

    To advertise in our e-letters or email list, please click here.

    Human Events | One Massachusetts Ave., N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001

    You were added to the system March 5, 2009. For more information click here.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  17. Is calling phylmike34 a spammer name-calling, or simply the truth?

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  18. Have you written up a comprehensive paper on your study for publication? I would be interested in having a copy. The raw data backing your conclusions would be too lengthy to post here.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  19. I would be be sursprise if your finding are true. But then just about anything goes on the internet, wonder what your finding would show, if you were to take this out into the public and do a face to face test?

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  20. I'm not sure it would be much different. Rosie O'Donnell proclaimed that all gun owners should be killed on national television. Some people are very open about their hostility.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  21. Obama's 'birth certificate' not acceptable in Hawaii?

    Even state requires long-form document for some eligibility, identification issues

    Posted: June 07, 2009

    4:10 pm Eastern

    © 2009 WorldNetDaily

    From the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands website

    WASHINGTON – The Hawaiian certification of live birth Barack Obama posted on his campaign website and distributed to select news organizations as proof he was a "natural born citizen" would not be accepted as a "birth certificate" even for some Hawaiian state government eligibility issues, WND has learned.

    The investigation follows a Honolulu Star Bulletin column Saturday, which quotes a state Department of Health spokeswoman as saying the state's current certification of live birth is recognized "as an official birth certificate meeting all federal and other requirements."

    The website of the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, however, states clearly the certification of live birth touted by the Obama campaign, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs and a host of other Obama defenders is not acceptable as a form of identification to qualify under this program.

    As WND has reported, certifications of live birth were widely issued to Hawaiians born in foreign countries in 1961, the year Obama was born.

    Are you motivated yet to join the billboard campaign and clear up the air of mystery surrounding Barack Obama's constitutional eligibility to serve?

    The Star Bulletin column goes on to report: "The issue of what constitutes an official Hawaii birth certificate received national attention during last year's presidential campaign. Those who doubted Barack Obama's American citizenship called the copy of the Hawaii birth document posted on his campaign website a fake."

    However, Obama's "citizenship" was never the question raised during the campaign or after the election. The issue raised by WND has consistently been that Obama failed to prove he was actually born in Hawaii and thus constitutionally qualified to become president as a "natural born citizen" – which requires that the birth took place in the United States.

    The qualifications for the Hawaiian Home Lands program require a certified copy of a standard birth certificate – also known as the "long-form certificate" filled out in the hospital and including details such as the name of the hospital and the attending physician.

    "In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green," the qualifications state. "This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL."

    According to Hawaii's Department of Health spokeswoman Janice Okubo, the state only issues "certifications" of live births since 2001 when the health department went paperless. It is only available in electronic form, she said.

    "At that time, all information for births from 1908 (on) was put into electronic files for consistent reporting," she is quoted as telling the Star Bulletin. "The electronic record of the birth is what (the Health Department) now keeps on file in order to provide same-day certified copies at our help window for most requests," Okubo said.

    She did not explain how those needing a standard long-form birth certificate to qualify for programs such as those offered by the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands or to establish proof of eligibility to be president could be fulfilled. She said the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized the state's current certification of live birth "as an official birth certificate meeting all federal and other requirements." She did not, however, cite any specific rulings, and the Supreme Court has not taken up the issue of whether the certification of live birth would qualify a presidential candidate as eligible under the "natural born citizen" clause

    Many of members of the public commenting on the Star Bulletin column raised similar questions:

    "I'm fifty years old and I need to apply for a passport," wrote one. "So I scan some representation of COLB onto my Facebook page. If I take my laptop to the DMV, can I just open my laptop to show my web page to the clerk who will then verify my citizenship and issue me a legal passport? I'm sorry but some documents need a paper trail."

    "To be president you need to be a 'natural born citizen,'" said another. "That means you are born in this country of 'parents that are citizens.' Note that both 'parent' and 'citizen' are plural. His father was a British subject and, yes, under the laws of both the United States and the UK at the time [when] he was born, Obama's citizenship was passed by descent of the father. These are the facts. We have laws and no one is above them."

    "There seems to be a great deal of secrecy surrounding this whole situation," said another. "I've read that he has three legal teams keeping his info private. He has also had all his college records sealed. So this is transparency and change? Why all the mystery?"

    Additional controversy over where Obama was born came when the woman the president says is his paternal grandmother, Sarah Obama, claimed to have been present at her grandson's birth in Mombasa, Kenya.

    Joseph Farah, WND editor and chief executive officer, launched a national billboard campaign last month in an effort to keep the issue before the American people. The billboards, being leased around the country, ask the simple question, "Where's the birth certificate?" Farah is asking the public to support his campaign with donations. So far, more than $75,000 has been collected.

    Last week, CBS, the largest provider of outdoor advertising in the country, announced it would refuse requests for space for the campaign. But Farah says CBS' refusal to lease space for the campaign will not hinder it.

    "There are plenty of other billboard companies willing and eager to take our money," said Farah. "The only obstacle to this campaign is raising the money necessary to make it truly a national phenomenon."

    The billboard campaign followed one launched months earlier to collect the names on an electronic petition demanding accountability and transparency on the issue. So far, that petition has gathered nearly 400,000 names.

    The campaign got a boost last week when WND White House correspondent Les Kinsolving asked Obama's press secretary, Robert Gibbs, why the president wouldn't release his birth certificate. Gibbs' response was covered live on C-SPAN and by Fox News Channel and others – excluding CBS.

    It was the first time any member of the press corps has publicly asked a member of the administration a question directly related to Obama's constitutional eligibility for office as a "natural born citizen."

    Congressional hearings were held to determine whether Sen. John McCain was constitutionally eligible to be president as a "natural born citizen," but no controlling legal authority ever sought to verify Obama's claim to a Hawaiian birth.

    Both the petition and the billboard campaign are part of what Farah calls an independent "truth and transparency campaign."

    The first sign to be posted under the campaign, a digital, electronic one, is up and online on Highway 165 in Ball, La. – the result of a donation by the owner. In addition, based on the heavy volume of financial donations in the first days of the campaign, WND was able to commit to leasing three more standard billboards – one in Los Angeles, another in Orange County, Calif. and a third in Pennsylvania.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  22. phylmike34,

    From your spam: "Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL."

    So, is WND lying when they state, earlier in the article, "The website of the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, however, states clearly the certification of live birth touted by the Obama campaign, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs and a host of other Obama defenders is not acceptable as a form of identification to qualify under this program."?

    "Additional controversy over where Obama was born came when the woman the president says is his paternal grandmother, Sarah Obama, claimed to have been present at her grandson's birth in Mombasa, Kenya."

    And that's another lie. If you listen to the entire tape, not the edited version you can find on YouTube, she (actually, his paternal step-grandmother) was claiming to have been present in Kenya when BO was born in Hawaii. Translation can be tricky, but the YouTube tape was doctored.

    3 years ago
    0
    0