New Directives to Protect Whisleblowers from Punishment

Rank 23
Idea#244

Stage: Active

Campaign: Legal & Policy Challenges

Directives and legislation providing protection for whistleblowers who disclose waste, fraud, or abuse within an agency, and punitive processes for managers who retaliate against those whistleblowers in their performance reviews should be established. irectives should clarify to all agencies, including law enforcement and intelligence agencies, the expectation that whistleblowers be robustly defended from reprisals and that whistleblower claims be dealt with quickly and fairly.

The president should establish a culture that supports whistleblowers by rewarding disclosure and punishing retaliation in performance appraisals. The president must also work with Congress to enact comprehensive federal whistleblower reform that extends meaningful protections to law enforcement and intelligence agency whistleblowers.

- From the 21st Century RTK Agenda

Tags

Submitted by

Feedback Score

348 votes
Voting Disabled

Idea Details

Vote Activity (latest 20 votes)

  1. Agreed
  2. Agreed
  3. Agreed
  4. Agreed
  5. Agreed
  6. Agreed
  7. Agreed
  8. Disagreed
  9. Agreed
  10. Agreed
  11. Disagreed
  12. Agreed
  13. Agreed
  14. Agreed
  15. Agreed
  16. Agreed
  17. Disagreed
  18. Agreed
  19. Agreed
  20. Agreed
(latest 20 votes)

Similar Ideas [ 5 ]

ReviewScale

Assessment

Comments

  1. Comment
    Bob Cooper

    whistle-blowers have been, historically, some of the best sources of information on wrongdoing in government (and, for that matter, in the private sector). We've relied on whistleblowers since the false claims act and need to protect these brave public servants who risk their careers to inform us of what's going wrong.

    0 Agreed
    0 Disagreed
  2. Comment
    Stephen Buckley

    I truly wish it that it would be that easy.

    If "whistleblower protection" were as simple as passing a new law or issuing a new directive, it would have happened a long time ago.

    It is not easy to prove that a manager is retaliating against a whistleblower. How do can you prove that the promotion really should have gone to Bill, instead of Dave? Unless it's really blatant (which is very rare), there's no way to figure out if it's reprisal or performance-related.

    And if you can't prove retaliation, then you can't "punish retaliation". Please show me the language in such a directive that will solve that all-too-common dilemma. Otherwise, all this idea is just wishful rhetoric.

    The only real way to prevent retaliation is to shield the identity of the whistleblower.

    And an online system is the best way to do that. It's what Fortune 500 companies now use to comply with the federal law (ironically) following the WorldCom and Enron scandals. See my idea:

    Make It Safe for Govt. Workers to Innovate to Save Money

    http://opengov.ideascale.com/akira/dtd/2481-4049

    vr,

    Stephen Buckley

    http://www.UStransparency.com

    0 Agreed
    0 Disagreed
  3. Comment
    mesoooverry

    Protect the whistleblowers on this site from having their posts scrubbed. There would be a different order of top posts if free exchange of ideas weren't trashed on this site and by this administration!

    0 Agreed
    0 Disagreed
  4. Comment
    joemck85

    Now here's a whistleblower idea I can get behind. No 18-page name spam.

    0 Agreed
    0 Disagreed