I agreeto Idea My Society: Our Problems Need Not Be Government Problems
Voting is Disabled

30 votes

I disagree

Rank1632

Idea#736

This idea is active.
Do-It-Yourself Government »

My Society: Our Problems Need Not Be Government Problems

Why Is This Idea Important?: - A healthy exercise of social capital through open discussion, trust, and exchange - Empowers individuals and communities alike - Transparency keeps us honest and in tune with each other, both within communities and between communities - Alleviates the burden on government and keeps the responsibility with the people - Helps combat moral hazards where decisions made by officials in government effect entire communities without touching the deciders

Invest in Web 2.0 tools to help people create transparent, flexible, Do-It-Yourself communities. Essentially, we have the technology to create our own communities with many of the benefits associated with cooperation and exchange, such as pooled resources, civic institutions, social capital, and cultural capital. We should use it and education to empower individuals, communities, and society at large.

Although we can do these things already, without extra tools, the idea is that technology can make it simple. Ideally, this simplicity makes it more available with less effort and resources.

This kind of software can ease communication between distant people, maintain transparency, and be flexible enough to facilitate many issues. For instance, it could allow customized governing systems (direct democracy, republics, hierarchies, you name it) tailored to the community, it can automate transparent donation funded capital projects, or even run vote based public works and volunteer projects. With strong enough identification, we can even automate binding contracts that can add security and legitimacy to these projects.

For example, a neighborhood community could create a place to voice local issues and solutions. If ten nearby families are suffering from transportation problems, they use a ride share plug-in to coordinate resources. If nearby businesses and houses are flooded, the community can pool money and bid for a contractor or use online volunteering outreach to repair the area. Whatever people come up with, you can be sure it will strengthen the community and help exercise the constitutive social practices needed to make society work.

Still yet, the communities can be abstract, such as a community of family friends who happen to span five houses across two cities. Perhaps international travel is an important part of the experience they want to give their children, so they discuss making a shared money market account to take advantage of economies of scale, a process technology makes trivial. Moreover, since this community can be transparent, outsiders could look in and offer better solutions, such as discounted flights for large parties or more effective investment opportunities.

Since when did our problems become government problems that we couldn't solve between ourselves? Let's make this a reality and take some burden off our bureaucratic institutions and officials, because when a hammer will do you do not need to go looking for a sledgehammer.

We are not alone, and together we can tackle anything. Let's make the tools to take responsibility back into our hands, and make this investment that will pay dividends towards civic society down the road. This isn't rocket science; this is just computer science and democracy.

Submitted by igienger 3 years ago

Vote Activity Show

(latest 20 votes)

Comments (10)

  1. Why does this need funding?

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  2. igienger Idea Submitter

    Because even a Fortune 500 software engineering company would need hundreds of thousands of dollars, perhaps millions (depends on the scope), to develop the project correctly. In addition, some money must be spent to maintain the computational resources necessary (servers, bandwidth, upkeep). That's less of a worry, because that's relatively very cheap compared to the development.

    While open source development is an option, I think the quality of the product tends to lag behind products from paid development.

    Hope that helps =)

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  3. igienger Idea Submitter

    There is also something to be said about funding technology that encourages traits basic to a democratic society: social capital, e pluribus unum, openness, and cooperation.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  4. i do agree that communities need to be more responsive and hands on about social problems, but lets address the real problem and how it affects all people and me .and for me we have been stuck in the industrial revolution 30 years to long out planet is dying a fast death and we have nowhere to go and what do we do to acknoledge this? Id have to say not enough, can a computer program solve this?or can all people agree we must do things now to move away from a life that has nothing to offer future generations?

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  5. igienger Idea Submitter

    With technology such as this, you and other people you think are suffering from this problem can get together and create strategies to deal with it. It's hard (maybe impossible?) to get 100% of people to agree, but we can easily find some others who agree with us now and make progress _today_.

    It would probably start small, with people scattered across the country who are as passionate as you, but you can work out solutions. Do you think reducing electricity use in your household would help? Then get a few people, maybe 50, to donate $10 dollars each, buy some energy efficient light bulbs in bulk, replace old bulbs in your home, and hand out the efficient light bulbs to your neighbors. Do you think we need to preserve land and natural spaces? Get 250 people together in the local area who think so too, and brainstorm. If you each saved up $1000 over a year, you could buy at least 10 acres in many places, and preserve that land for less industrial purposes.

    Prove that it works, and convince others to join your community, and you could be working towards that goal NOW. That, or use the sledgehammer and wait 80 years until a politician finally gets enough advertising dollars to sway the majority. Hrm.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  6. Who will contribute the funding? Is this from the government or the community?

    How is this different from social networking tools like Facebook?

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  7. igienger Idea Submitter

    Funding would come from a community of citizens inclined towards Do-It-Yourself services and institutions. Most of the time, a passionate community organizer gets the ball rolling.

    This is different than social networking, because the technology is designed to make community organizing easier, not just communication. Facebook, for example, can't help you start a community capital project to create a homeless shelter, although you might talk about it. A tool can ease the process by giving passionate organizers online paperwork and book keeping to form a non-profit, automated online donation collections, online advertising and social networking, tools to gather and schedule volunteers, and so on.

    Like the cotton gin for civic society, it can reduce the barriers for do-it-yourself civic projects.

    Also, as far as government vs community goes, we need both. Thing is, for local and very specific issues, top-down projects from the government tend to be heavy handed, whereas bottom-up approaches are much more tailored to the community.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  8. I agree, but I think the existing tools are good enough. The most important thing is getting users, and they have that in spades.

    I'm not sure how community organizing is different from communication. I certainly could propose creating a homeless shelter to my local friends on facebook and do it. If you need money, you either ask for donations or go to a microcharity site.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  9. igienger Idea Submitter

    At least for us, the hardest part of setting a project up was wading through codes and requirements from local/state government. It wasn't impossible, but the hope is technology can make it simple, and simplicity makes it more available for less effort/resources.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  10. That makes more sense. I would favor removing regulation myself, but that is another issue.

    I think the real solution here is for people to post their experiences to the internet, along with details about how they overcame them.

    www.stackoverflow.com has a good model for a question / answer site, but is focused entirely on programming questions.

    3 years ago
    0
    0