I agreeto Idea Making Govt Ops More Open
Voting is Disabled

22 votes

I disagree

Rank1966

Idea#900

This idea is active.
Making Government Operations More Open »

Making Govt Ops More Open

Why Is This Idea Important?: *Enables voters to make more informed decisions on proposed public expenditures *Holds governments more accountable for expenditure of public funds

I support the League of Women Voters position on open government, especially transparency.

At the local taxation level, I propose that state election laws governing funding propositions require that, for every proposed tax increase (sales, gross receipts, millage, special taxation districts/assessments) and bond proposal, the governmental unit be required to disclose:

1) FOR CONSTRUCTION PROPOSALS/BONDS

*Design drawings

*Projected construction costs

*Projected project completion dates

*Potential tax reduction/savings which would be achieved

through non-renewal of existing bonds/proposals, and

estimated overhead cost of bond/funding administration

*Strict regulation of such misleading statements

as "Will not increase taxes" (omitting

administrative costs of election, bond issuance, etc.)

2) FOR CANDIDATES FOR PUBLIC OFFICE

Online posting of candidate donations and donors, to be

posted on the website of the governing body presiding

over the election, no later than three (3) days before

the election date, as well as any post-election updates

Submitted by ceverettg 4 years ago

Vote Activity Show

(latest 20 votes)

Comments (3)

  1. I strongly disagree with point one. The architects who create the drawings/ plans need to be paid, so requiring that the plans exist before funding is made available is like putting the horse before the cart.

    4 years ago
    0
    0
  2. I don't agree that the Federal Gov should be dictating to the States. State should come first per our Constitution.

    I also agree about the payment per a.klassykat.

    4 years ago
    0
    0
  3. ceverettg Idea Submitter

    Here in NM it's common for local governments to pay for concept drawings upfront (before a bond proposal is approved) - when that government unit is trying to SELL the project to the voters. They then claim that the concept drawings are not detailed enough to estimate costs. Would you take out a mortgage on a house without knowing its sale price? That's exactly what voters are being asked to do.

    As for "dictating to the states," the US Constitution by definition supersedes state laws. This was re-affirmed when Lee surrendered to Grant at Appomatox.

    4 years ago
    0
    0