I agreeto Idea FACA and Consensus Building
Voting is Disabled

13 votes

I disagree

Rank2436

Idea#362

This idea is active.
Federal Advisory Committees »

FACA and Consensus Building

Why Is This Idea Important?: FACA can provide a significant roadblock to collaboration and broad participation in solution seeking consensus efforts. This should ultimately addressed by Congress but a stakeholder dialogue on what kinds of changes are needed to the current procedure to better support collaboration should be undertaken.

Those working to collaborate and build consensus on policy development and solutions and with federal agencies and other governmental programs at the state, local and tribal levels and with stakeholders from the civic and business sectors, have found the FACA, as currently set forth, to be an inhibitor of open collaboration.

This has led to contorted collaboration practices where the convener must inform those participating that they can offer their individual opinions but not work together to inform each other of different perspectives, sort through the issues and agree on advisory consensus recommendations.

An example where this proved to be a major roadblock to progress was in the Everglades restoration conflicts in the early 1990's. Lawyers advising the Department of Interior suggested the FACA prevented a Federal Task Force from meeting jointly with a Governor's Commission made up of a range of stakeholders and federal, state, local and tribal interests. In response to this, Congress passed the 1996 Water Resources Development Act and addressed this by two new provisions:

1. They recreated the Task Force as one with federal, state, local and tribal representatives;

2. They provided Everglades restoration consensus building efforts supported by the Task Force with a FACA

exemption.

Submitted by rmjones 3 years ago

Vote Activity Show

Comments (2)

  1. It seems that FACA (Federal Advisory Committee Act) badly needs to be revisited and revised. Moreover, more leadership is needed regarding the purposes and principles of the Act. FACA implementation, as controlled by agency/departmental lawyers, is terribly inconsistent throughout the executive branch.

    3 years ago
    0
    0
  2. I have worked with several Federal Advisory Committees. In my experience, having open meetings leads to politics and posturing, rather than honest dialog around issues and constructive collaboration to develop creative solutions to tough problems. A balance needs to be found that allows public input and participation, while still providing a safe environment for risk taking. Without that, you are wasting the tax payers' money and achieving suboptimal results.

    3 years ago
    0
    0