OpenGov - Open Government Brainstorm

You forgot these:

An incompetent set of birfer lawyers to sneakily assist your BC cover-up with poorly written legal challenges

A complicit Republican former president who so screwed up his job that the American electorate were willing to elect Mickey Mouse--as long as Mickey wasn't a Republican.

A criminal Republican former vice-president who sanctioned torture in violation of the Geneva Convention, thus putting our own soldiers at grave risk.

A bald headed hiphop RNC chairman who was hired to appeal to the young vote, but instead is the laughing stock of the country

A fat, loud mouthed drug addict radio host who acts as the titular head of the opposition, and whose negative perception ratings are only rivaled by Hugo Chavez' ratings.

And...

A hypocritical set of family values politicians who can't keep their own tallywhackers in their pants, but have the nerve to criticize uber-dawg Bill Clinton.

An incredibly gracious and exceedingly perfect former First Lady--Laura Bush--a woman who I would vote for in a New York minute, for any post she chose to run for.

A lying set of birfer sychophants who don't know sh*t about U.S. law.

Blackmon, is this "birfer" situation the only issue you comment on? There are far more problems with Obama than that! You're getting redundant.

Apugh,

The birfer issue is the only issue that I will deride, demean, and ridicule its partisans. Birferism is a created issue with no basis in truth.

In all other issues I'm willing to be civil and willing to listen. I am not an Obama flunky. His policies are fair game. His citizenship is not.

All he has to do is prove himself a natural born citizen. It doesnt matter who and why the skeptism came about. He refuses to provide the proof. Even when no-one mentions it, you do. Drop it already! The sun did not rise on Obama nor will it set there. If you were concerned about something would it be right for people to ridicule you about it? The first thing that people do when confronted with a possible truth is deny and ridicule the possibility. They shoot the messenger. Believe me, sinkng our boat won't make yours float!

"All he has to do is prove himself a natural born citizen."

He's already done that. You just don't accept what he's shown. And if he brought you a BC certified by Jesus Christ you would question its validity. And that's why he ignores you.

Yes it is true.. Michelle Obama is a Stick Chick.

Michelle O. is a hamma. Yow yow!!

The mainstream media is in blackout on this issue, so we are on our own. The best thing that we can do is write to the agencies below and demand that a Quo Warrento suit be opened to investigate the possible ineligibility of Barrack Obama a.k.a. Barry Soetoro. Get a proof of mailing when sending for a record or if you can afford it send certified mail, return receipt. Don't write once, send often. Have friends and family send, the more people who complain and protest this injustice to the American people, the sooner something will get done. Part of the problem is not many have been doing this, so the justice department views the 500 or so letters that they have received as cranks. If great numbers of letters of concern are received by them, then they cannot ignore us. See example below:

US Attorney for DC

CHANNING D. PHILLIPS

United States Attorney's Office

555 4th Street, NW

Washington, DC 20530

U.S. Department of Justice Office of Special Counsel

Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald

Washington Office:

Bond Federal Building

1400 New York Avenue, NW, Ninth Floor

Washington D.C. 20530

CC: Chicago Office:

Dirksen Federal Building

219 South Dearborn Street, Fifth Floor

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Attorney General for the United States

Eric H. Holder Jr.

U.S. Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20530-0001

Dear ________________:

As a Citizen of the United States of America, I have the deepest concern for the safety of our country.

There is a urgent need for this nation to hear and resolve the issue of Barack Obama’s eligibility for office. I base this statement on the Constitutional requirement (Section 1, Article 2 of the US Constitution: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States) calling for the President to retain a special status of Natural Born Citizen in order to qualify for eligibility to that office, I have reviewed the definition of Natural Born Citizen as written in the Federal Papers by Justice John Jay. This definition of citizenship goes back centuries! Nowhere in history is Natural Born Citizen defined in such a way that would allow a person with divided loyalties to become President! It is a fact that Obama was born a subject of the British Crown. He openly admits his father is a British Subject at the time of his birth.

Here are several references to the meaning of Natural Born Citizen. I implore you, URGENTLY, to investigate on your own.

-1758 Vattel’s “The Law of Nations” –The Framers relied on many of the principles to write the Constitution.

-1787-1788 The Federalist Papers, including Justice John Jay’s letter to George Washington.

-Article II, Section I, United States Constitution.

-The Naturalization Act of 1790-repeal of “Natural Born” from the 1790 Act in 1795.

-The Framers of the 14th Amendment-(citizenship granted, not Natural Born Citizenship); Rep. John Bingham and Sen. Lyman Trumball define Natural Born Citizen.

-Congressional Hearing on Dual Citizenship, 2005, “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” discussion .

Our Nation is at grave risk. This issue MUST be addressed. Citizens across this nation are asking this question: Is Obama qualified to be our President and Commander in Chief? The public protests are beginning. There is a significant movement and it is spreading like an impassioned grass fire. To assume it will go away is foolhardy. Furthermore, the usurpation of our Constitution threatens the very survival of our Union!

Our military is in jeopardy of becoming divided over this issue. With these lawsuits; one solider today, another tomorrow, and now our loyal service men and woman are in personal jeopardy!

The survival of our nation is at stake. This issue will not go away.

For whatever political and historical reasons we have come to this dire situation, you are the person empowered by Congress to file a Quo Warranto on behalf of the United States. As a Natural Born Citizen and a descendant of our founding father, Roger Sherman, I implore you to PLEASE….. issue a Quo Warranto to provide The USA citizenry an answer to this constitutionally vital question.

Federal statute (Chapter 35§ 16-3501) for quo warranto was tailor made by the legislature to challenge any person occupying any public office of the United States under questionable title thereto.

· The Attorney General of the United States or the United States attorney may institute a proceeding pursuant to this subchapter on his own motion or on the relation of a third person.

· Two individuals have authority to bring quo warranto action: Attorney General Eric Holder, and US Attorney for the District of Columbia, Mr. Channing D Phillips.

· Only one of these officials need bring the action in quo warranto.

· The federal quo warranto statute provides the only Constitutional means by which a sitting President may be removed by the Judicial branch.

· Congress has provided for the removal of a sitting President found to be ineligible by enacting the federal quo warranto statute.

· Nowhere in the Constitution does it give the Judicial Branch the power to remove a sitting President. The Constitution has provided congress with the authority to remove the president from office in cases other than impeachment.

o Constitution Article 2, Section 1, Clause 6. “In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge…”. Note the word “or”.

o Congress is authorized to exercise removal power by the 25th Amendment – and such power must be derived directly from Article 2 Section 1 Clause 6.

· SCOTUS is not a trier of fact and so quo warranto MUST be brought before the District Court for the District of Columbia EXACTLY as the statute requires.

· Quo warranto action is proper to settle title to the office of President for the good of the nation.

· Even if both officials are convinced Obama is eligible, it’s still proper for them to institute a quo warranto proceeding because the evidence emerging now is that, by leaving the controversy as is, a floodgate of litigation will ensue.

· The best possible candidates who should request the US Attorney and/or the Attorney General to bring an action in quo warranto on their own motion are Retired Military officers who understand the absolute need for the President’s title to office not to be encumbered by doubt.20

· THREE WAYS TO BRING QUO WARRANTO

1. The US attorney and/or the US Attorney General institute the case on their own motion – which is the best way this could happen. No leave of the court need be requested. There will be a hearing and a trial of facts.

2. If no authorized Government attorneys will bring the action on their own motion, then any citizen may join a law suit as “third persons” and such law suit, by way of verified petition, shall be brought to the US Attorney and/or the Attorney General to ask their consent to use the name of the United States. If the Government gives consent, then you must request permission from the court to bring the suit as well. And if the Court says yes, you will have a hearing on the merits.

3. If the Government will not give consent, then “interested persons” may request leave of the court to institute the action in quo warranto. But standing will be – according to SCOTUS in Newman – restricted to anybody who was ousted from the office of POTUS (and nobody is going to meet that requirement) or, in the alternative there might by cases under the civil service laws which provide standing.

· CONCLUSION: The District of Columbia Code is the only means by which a federal quo warranto action can be instituted and its application is strictly limited to public offices of the United States or local DC offices within the ten square=2 0miles of the District of Columbia. No public office, i.e. POTUS, is exempt by the statute.

I seek your immediate response to my grave concern.

hee-hee-hee!!

Good luck, Sallie!!

Sen. Leahy Says Obama Not Eligible

On April 10, 2008, Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Claire McCaskill (D-MO) introduced a resolution expressing the sense of the U.S. Senate that presidential candidate Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) was a 'natural born Citizen,' as specified in the Constitution and eligible to run for President.

"Because he was born to American citizens, there is no doubt in my mind that Senator McCain is a natural born citizen," said Leahy. "I expect that this will be a unanimous resolution of the Senate."

At a Judiciary Committee hearing on April 3, Leahy asked Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, himself a former Federal judge, if he had doubts that McCain was eligible to serve as President.

"My assumption and my understanding is that if you are born of American parents, you are naturally a natural-born American citizen," Chertoff replied.

"That is mine, too," said Leahy.

What's interesting here is that Sen. Leahy, the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary, confirms that a "natural born" citizen is the child of American citizen parents.

Parents -- that's two. That's BOTH parents.

Every time the words, "citizen" and "parent," are used by Sen. Leahy and Sec. Chertoff, the plural case, "citizens" and "parents," was used. The plural case is the operative case.

It is Sen. Leahy's opinion -- his own recorded words, on his U. S. Senate website -- that Barack Obama is not a "natural born" citizen, and therefore not eligible to serve as Commander-in-Chief, regardless of his birthplace.

Obama had one American parent --singular -- his mother. His father was a citizen of Kenya, and a subject of Great Britain.

Obama, himself, "at birth," was a citizen of Kenya, and a subject of Great Britain -- he says so on his own campaign website. This fact introduces the concept of "divided loyalties," -- the reason the founders created the eligibility requirement in the first place -- a fact that further underlines Obama's ineligibility.

The source of this information is Sen. Leahy's own website. The webpage contains a statement about the resolution; the resolution, itself; the Statement Of Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.); and an excerpt of Sec. Chertoff's testimony.

The plural word "parents" is used four times. When used to identify the parents, the word "citizens" is used five times. That's nine times that Sen. Leahy, on his own website describes the eligibility requirement. There is NO PLACE in any of these four documents where the singular case of "parent" or "citizen" is used as in reference to presidential eligibility.

McCain was born in Panama which at the time was a U.S. Territory (e.g. Washington D.C.) His Father was Military and Both Parents were U.S Citizens.

Why they made a stink over this and yet never ask Obama to show his long form bc is a mistery. MaCain was vetted by Congress Obama was never Vetted by anyone!

Honduran military ousts president ahead of vote

this is what we need to happen a military coup!

i hope the military acts on the behalf of the american people and removes all these liberal scum from office.

Well mrbuzzsaw we have a Coup de Etat by an Usurper and the DSA right now. Our government has been taken over by the DSA Democrat Socialist of American who deceived Americans by running on the Democrat Party ticket. There are over 80+ DSA members in Congress, Pelosi is their ringleader and other DSA members hold positions as Chair and committee members on all House & Senate Committees, which is why they will not investigate other DSA members in Congress i.e. Pelosi, Rangel, Frank, Waters, Murtha, Dodd, ACORN etc.. for ethics, Congressional procedures, Constitutional Violations, Conflict of Interests, Misuse of Taxpayer Dollars, and Abuse of Power. They are policing each other or should I say not policing each other on purpose. The sponsors, Waxman & Markey, of the Deceptive Cap & Trade Tax Bill H.R. 2454 are also DSA members, which will raise to cost of your electricity by 90%, raise your natural gas by 55%, raise your gasoline by 58% and raise the average family energy bill by $1500-$3500 per year. Why would the DSA Demo Majority Congress & BO do this to the American people at a time when millions of Americans have lost their jobs, homes, 401ks, retirement etc...? So other DSA Demos i.e. Pelosi ($100k invested in clean energy fuels corpt.), Markey ($115k invested in 3 solar mfgs. of lst 10 Tech. Value Fund), Gore's carbon footprint software, GE CEO Immelt wind turbins & grid etc.. Another words they are writing billion dollar legislation to pad their own pockets with Federal U.S. Taxpayers money - CORRUPTION TO THE 3RD DEGREE WHILE RESTRUCTURING THE FREE REPUBLIC OF THE U.S.A. INTO A SOCIALIST OLIGARCHY RAN BY A USURPER WITH OVER 21 CZARS SEIZING AMERICAN BANKS, FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, AUTO INDUSTRIES ect.. AND ALL THE TAXPAYER MONEY THEY CAN SQUEEZE OUT OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. THE DEMOCRAT PARTY HAS BEEN HIJACKED BY THE DSA DEMOCRAT SOCIALIST OF AMERICAN. WELCOME TO THE U.S.S.R.