Meet Orly Taitz - The Queen of the BIRFER Movement

blackmonrikker 9 months ago

Yo, Redkite? Why would you vote against this? This is an article about Oily Taint!! The REAL DEAL!!

blackmonrikker 9 months ago

"What isn’t difficult is understanding why someone would buy the eligibility idea. Taitz, even with her tendency to misuse pronouns and mispronounce words, can put together an explanation in a few minutes that actually sounds compelling.

It goes like this:

Article 2 of the U.S. Constitution specifies that the president of the United States must be, among other things, a “natural-born citizen.” There’s disagreement as to what that means (more on that later), but there’s no dispute that it requires a president to have been an American citizen at the time of his or her birth. Obama says he was born in Honolulu in 1961, but he has never publicly produced his original birth certificate—that piece of paper parents get when they have a new child, which features the name of the hospital as well as the name of the attending physician. Responding to rumors that Obama’s middle name is “Muhammad,” the Obama campaign in June 2008 published a scanned image of his Certificate of Live Birth (COLB), a short-form printout that doesn’t list hospital or doctor.

Taitz and others say they have reason to doubt the veracity of Obama’s COLB. Forensic experts have set up web pages and signed affidavits saying it’s a forgery. There’s a law on the books in Hawaii that allows foreign-born children to obtain a Hawaiian COLB. And the information on a late-registered COLB doesn’t need to be verified by anyone; it’s based solely on the testimony of one parent. On top of all that, there’s a recording and transcript of Obama’s Kenyan grandmother telling an interviewer that she was present when Barack Obama was born in Africa. And in 1981, Obama traveled to Pakistan; at the time, though, there was a ban on American passport holders entering that country."

blackmonrikker 9 months ago

In light of all these and other facts, Taitz argues that Obama should be forced to release his entire hospital-birthing file, passport information and college records.

The problem is most of the above facts AREN'T TRUE.

For starters, the Pakistan “travel ban” is a complete fabrication based on zero evidence and completely contradicted by State Department records and a 1981 New York Times article. The full transcript from Obama’s grandmother shows that she never said he was born in Kenya—in fact, she repeatedly said he was born in Hawaii. The law allowing foreign-born children to obtain Hawaiian COLBs didn’t exist until 20 years after Obama was born, while Obama’s published COLB says his birth information was recorded four days after his birth in 1961. And those “forensic experts” who say Obama’s document is phony? There have only been three of them: Two haven’t published their real names or any verifiable credentials (one went by the moniker “TechDude”), and the other merely said that she can’t make a determination of a document’s authenticity based solely on a JPEG.

blackmonrikker 9 months ago

Hee-hee-hee!!!

Stings a bit, don't it?

blackmonrikker 9 months ago

This article even takes a shot as us PJers!!!

"It sometimes seems as though the “anti-birther” community is just as obsessed as the people it keeps an eye on. On Politijab.com, there’s an entire forum devoted to Taitz, complete with topics such as “Orly’s Facebook Page” and “How Long Until Orly’s Breakdown?” At YesToDemocracy.com, bloggers provide regular updates on the latest birther activities, with some choice digs at the “nitrous-huffing,” “cavity creep” that is Orly Taitz."

Politijab makes it into the MSM!!!! This is the first reference I have seen to us in the MSM. We're on our way to the big time politics now!!

blackmonrikker 9 months ago

“It’s just fascinating,” says Bob Haggard, a frequent poster on Politijab’s Orly Taitz forum. “She runs around the country doing things that amount to absolutely nothing. She tells her followers that she ‘files’ all sorts of documents, but she never files anything. She drops stuff off.”

Patrick McKinnion of Yes to Democracy puts it a different way: “There’s a certain amount of fascination with unbridled insanity, and that’s what you’re seeing with the birthers: a level of hatred that borders, if not absolutely pole-vaults, into insanity.”

OMG!!!! She never files anything!!! She just DROPS STUFF OFF!!!! TOO FUNNY!!!!

And this is what your birfer dollars are paying for!!!

I'm CRYING with laughter here. Trying to read the article while tweaking you birfer twits!!! TOOO FUNNY!!!

How's it feel to be this deep into tardland a think you're making sense?

blackmonrikker 9 months ago

WOW!!! ALL of you birfers have voted down (so far) a fair and balanced article about Orly Taitz, the leader of the birfer movement.

I can't understand why. Is there something wrong with the article? Is it tainted with liberal bias?

Or have I so offended you idiots in the past that you vote down anything I post?

I'm going to have to go with the latter.

So that means I'm winning.

freedomfighter4theplanet 9 months ago

What passport did UHBAMA use when he was shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi ? How did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later??? And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi , what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration? The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers. It makes the debate over UHbama's citizenship a rather short and simple one.

Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?

A: Yes, by his own admission.

Q: What passport did he travel
under?

A: There are only three possibilities. 1. He traveled with a U.S. Passport, 2) He traveled with a British passport, or 3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport.

Q: Is it possible that UHbama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981?

A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981.

Conclusion: When UHbama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport.
If he was traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And if he was traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove that he
relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967..

Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a "natural born" American citizen between 1981 and 2008.

Given the destructive nature of his plans for America, as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better.

blackmonrikker 9 months ago

"The problem is most of the above facts AREN'T TRUE.

For starters, the Pakistan “travel ban” is a complete fabrication based on zero evidence and completely contradicted by State Department records"

stealthb2000 9 months ago

You know looking at this guy's sign in name. He must ride a black mongoose bicycle. Hince his handle. I guess his mommy hasn't bought him a car yet.

apugh96 9 months ago

Blackmon, that may be up to the courts to decide. Orly got a court date on July 13th according to WND.

blackmonrikker 9 months ago

Apugh,

Yes, Oily has a 7/13 hearing:

"Filed & Entered: 06/22/2009

Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held
Docket Text: MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: SETTING HEARING ON MOTION: Before the Court is a Motion by Plaintiffs for Reconsideration of Order to Show Cause or in the Alternative to Certify Question for Appeal. Court sets this matter for hearing on July 13, 2009 at 8:30a.m. in Courtroom 9D. Plaintiffs are directed to make every effort possible to ensure that all remaining defendants are aware of the hearing and provide documentation that the individual receiving service is authorized to accept on defendants' behalf."

Do you know she hasn't properly served ANY of the defendants? She just dropped off one of her dossiers. Just thought I'd drop that nugget out there.

Categories

Why Is This Idea Important?