http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/21/palin-spars-critics-ethics-complaints/
By her own admission, Sarah Palin has paid half a million dollars to fend off frivolous ethics complaints. If she isn't awash in ethical crimes, why doesn't she just admit her ethics shortcomings and this will all go away?
Because she CAN'T.
(Does this argument sound familiar, birfers?)
Comments (115)
JordanKJjordan!! Why would you vote against this? I'm just trying to get to the bottom of Sarah's ethical malfeasance!!! It's positively un-American they way she is stonewalling about her crimes against the State of Alaska. Clearly, the governor is a Muslim whose intent is to violate the American Constitution.
Why else would she be paying all these lawyers to ward off these lawsuits, lawsuits that are simply seeking disclosure?
She must be hiding something. Her actions are taking us down the path to Communism.
And this is a Faux News story!! By definition, it MUST be true!!
Monday, June 08, 2009
Palin cleared in ethics probe
"The Alaska Personnel Board report, issued on the eve of the U.S. presidential election, ran contrary to findings from a legislative inquiry that concluded in October that Palin had abused the power of her office by pressuring subordinates to fire a state trooper involved in a feud with her family."
Keep trolling sh1t disturber,She's been cleared of ALL BS charges brought up by democratic nitwits .YOU Fear her and it shows.She is all democrats wish they had.
Probes are ran by lawyers. Of course she had to hire a legal team. THAT does cost money! If you really want to gripe about ethics, let's start with A.C.O.R.N. who are actually being prosecuted in several states.
Is this what you have sank to since you have no other arguments? I thought you had a little more to ya than that...sad...just sad.
The democrats have become so cynical with their hate they now abuse even the court system to bring false charges and one has to pay to fight.
Unlike the obama situation that he stonewalls and refuses to show his records, Sarah has opened them all anf of course found innocent of the lies falsely accused of by hate mongers
That panel that cleared Sarah just before the election was made up of her handpicked stooges. There was never any doubt they'd find in her favor.
I remember Sarah refusing to disclose material and keeping her aides from testifying.
She's a corrupt lady. Lots of cases against her.
OMG!!! This is the funniest thread ever!!!
Carpenturr1, did you say something about bringing false charges against Palin?!??!?? Unlike Obama, Palin actually has to PAY these bills.
Obama's lawyers make the plaintiffs pay.
And Creek, BTW, I don't think Sarah is corrupt.
I don't think she's BRIGHT.
But I don't think she's corrupt.
You said that like Obumbo is a saint...just read all of the current news and see what that jackoff is currently doing to see how corrupt he is...you don't have to look far I promise.
Rooster,
Do you think all these ethical complaints will go away if Sarah comes clean?
I don't. If I was her, I would continue to stonewall, obfuscate and lie.
What about the spending binge on clothes she went on with the RNC's money? I remember something about her changing the state for her kids' airplane trips.
Creek,
Does that make her corrupt? She didn't keep the clothes. The RNC took them back. Sarah also charged the state of Alaska for working from home. I work from home. I do more work from home than I did when I worked from the office. Why shouldn't she charge them for that?
This thread is just birfer snark. I'm using the same idiot arguments the birfers use against Obama. When Obama is the target, it makes sense to them. When Palin is the target, it doesn't make sense.
rejean: "Keep trolling sh1t disturber,She's been cleared of ALL BS charges brought up by democratic nitwits .YOU Fear her and it shows.She is all democrats wish they had. "
I GENUINELY hope the Republicans run Sarah in 2012.
Yeah. She's a dishonest lady. She pretends she knows what she's talking about when she has no idea.
I got what your angle was from the beginning. You did this and they did that and I did what I did.
I don't think the issue was working from home. She claimed per diem for staying in a hotel in Juneau when in fact she was working from home. I don't think she gave the clothes back, just said she did.
Creek,
I don't think she's smart enough to be corrupt. I really think she's kinda, like, at rejean's level. Rejean is a full out tard.
Aren't these obama supporters such massive hypocrites.
When it comes to Sarah, they actually act like they care about the law.
Such contemptible liars and hypocrites, they mock law by their contempt for the law
Sarah Palin has to pay out this money to answer frivolous ethics violations and lawsuits, whether she's guilty or not.
She must hire lawyers to put together the answers to these things otherwise she'll lose just because of default.
Black, I know you know this. You're trying to mislead people by saying the fact that she hired an attorney makes her guilty. You know that is SO far from the truth.
csrbev,,That's why they call them trolls
csrbev writes:
"Black, I know you know this. You're trying to mislead people.."
Of course we do, and no one believes the crook anyway, no one that is not here to lie for obama that is
Carpenter, you mean no one believes the crook Obama?
From goodtimepolitics.com,,,,
Sarah Palin is a genuine ethics reformer, so they are trying to destroy her with frivolous ethics complaints.
April 29, 2009 · 2 Comments
Sarah is like Reagan, whose son described him as a guy “who always thinks the best of people” and can’t imagine that they would stab him in the back. Neither can Sarah Palin.
She has spent less in personal expenses than her predecessors. She has managed the state budget more responsibly. She put an end to backroom deal-making with oil producers and initiated an open and transparent process for negotiating a fair return on Alaska’s resources and developing a natural gas pipeline that is not beholden to any monopoly interest. She wanted them to hold her accountable because she knew that she could meet any fair final accounting.
But she didn’t anticipate the base motives of vindictive evil people. Yes, it is evil to try to bankrupt a family, to smear their names, to chase an honest reformer out of office. Read More
Latest Complaint Deemed Outrageous
The Office of the Governor today expressed outrage that yet another baseless ethics complaint has been filed as part of an alarming new development in Alaska politics.
“These allegations are categorically false and ridiculous, and are an abuse of the Executive Ethics Act,” Nizich said.
“We are blessed to live in a democracy in which everyone has the right to free speech, to petition their lawmakers, to vote, to run for office and, yes, to allege misconduct by public officials,” said Bill McAllister, the governor’s communications director. “But obviously the purpose of this complaint and the previous ones is to distract the administration and the public, and to paralyze the Department of Law and the executive branch.
“There’s a core hypocrisy in nearly all of the ethics complaints brought against the governor, including this one. The ethics act clearly states that complaints, when filed, are to be confidential. Ms. Tompkins publicized her filing on several blogs, breaking the letter and the spirit of the law. While there are no penalties in the statute for this illegal behavior, Alaskans of all political persuasions should be appalled that the people who are alleging unethical behavior by the governor are repeatedly doing so unethically.”
The relevant section of the ethics act follows:
“Sec. 39.52.340. Confidentiality. (a) Except as provided in AS 39.52.335, before the initiation of formal proceedings under AS 39.52.350, the complaint and all other documents and information regarding an investigation conducted under this chapter or obtained by the attorney general during the investigation are confidential and not subject to inspection by the public. In the case of a complaint concerning the governor, lieutenant governor, or attorney general, all meetings of the personnel board concerning the complaint and investigation before the determination of probable cause are closed to the public. … The attorney general and all persons contacted during the course of an investigation shall maintain confidentiality regarding the existence of the investigation.” Keep reading
The liberals have more ethics problems than Sarah Palin ever has! We could name a list of ethic corrupt democrats but then it would be to long a list to post here!
The Democrats can not get over the fact that Sarah Palin really was more experience than Barack when it comes to being President! Barack has now shown in his first 100 days just how inexperience he is!
The duty of confidentiality is on the attorney general and those RECEIVING the complaint. There is no duty of confidentiality on the party MAKING the complaint.
csrbev said: "She must hire lawyers to put together the answers to these things otherwise she'll lose just because of default."
Contrast this with Obama's answers to birfer lawsuits. He only files for dismissals. Lately he's been asking for damages--and winning. Recently a judge calculated Obama's damages at $520. That's how much he's spending to file for each dismissal.
Why can't Sarah ask for damages and win?
evreport,
Look at the voting patterns for this thread. If I substitute Obama's name for Palin's name, all of the idiots who voted this thread down would vote it up.
Not one of these mental giants sees the irony of that.
I'd like to see Palin's secret E-mails. What does she have to hide?
don't knwo what your talking about. i got one, heres some more idiot. a bat is made of wood a bat is hard, so my head is hard, its made of wood. HEY KEEP THESE STUPID THINGS OFF HERE. WAstig my time, months of amercians time, with foreign people and stuff. Just get outta here. this is total spam. this is a waste of bandwidth you need to be kicked off.
ldrancer: "don't knwo what your talking about."
You also don't know about Monty Python to quote them properly. You forgot the duck and the witch in your plagiarized analogy.
Idiot.
no i can't forget what it was they said, but i didn't even remember for sure, the analogy was logic, which you don't get, and im sure it wasn't even done in the right analogies for the logic and yea it wsa off monty pythons what logic means, but (this word got censored,whatcha gonna censor next kenyan)off, hey go take along walk off a short boardwalk. at least most people know that and don't take works off people, like global warming scam and the polar bears, yea that picture. plagarized. i figured people knew monty python i didn't need to do quotes, your next big thing you can do tomorrow, i'll take your tomorrow. I'll knock you into tomorrow. how about that for some. oh and it's my copyright, more important than human right. blah blah. crap, do that tomorrow. and i've already owned, took, knocked you into tomorrow. i had something to say.
oh yea, you don't know what logic is so such up.
way to argue with someone who says your wrong, about trivialities, and stuff that doens't matter, monty python, your not going to plagarize that, i didn't quote it as my own, so once again, LIAR on you.
your comment quoting me, me not knowing what your talking about, well i mean, what are you talking about, the only issue is the foreign. and then you bash, me well. i make fun of you with facts. your a loser. it wasn't even a witch i was talking about woman don't know logic monty python. a fish maybe was in it.
does it matter, he's foreign. what is this.
MAKING FUN OF YOU WITH FACTS IS FUNNY. IT'S funny cause it's TRUE. hahaha
blah blah yada yada.
I have some nice crayons for you, and some fishsticks.
Blackmansucker, why are you posting such BS on this site? You know that this topic is a joke at best. I really thought you would have something a little better to contemplate than this...something a little more challenging or of a better topic.
It doesn't have to be about Obama and how SHlTTY of a job he is doing but damn boy I know you could do better than to try to rope these guys into a no where debate about Sarah Palin.
I guess that since your BC conversation is dead and stinking you have to resort to this kinda crap for attention...sad man...just sad.
Democracy:
A government of the masses.
Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of "direct" expression.
Results in mobocracy.
Attitude toward property is comunistic-negating property rights.
Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate. whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences.
Results in demagogism license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.
Democracy is the "direct" rule of the people and has been repeatedly tried without success.
A certain Professor Alexander Fraser Tytler, nearly two centuries ago, had this to say about Democracy: " A Democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of Government. It can only exist until the voters discover they can vote themselves largess out of public treasury. From that moment on the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that Democracy always collapses over a loose fiscal policy, always to be followed by a Dictatorship."
A democracy is majority rule and is destructive of liberty because there is no law to prevent the majority from trampling on individual rights. Whatever the majority says goes! A lynch mob is an example of pure democracy in action. There is only one dissenting vote, and that is cast by the person at the end of the rope.
Republic:
Authority is derived through the election by the people of public officials best fitted to represent them.
Attitude toward property is respect for laws and individual rights, and a sensible economic procedure.
Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed principles and established evidence, with a strict regard to consequences.
A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be brought within its compass.
Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy. Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment, and progress.
Is the "standard form" of government throughout the world.
A republic is a form of government under a constitution which provides for the election of:
an executive and
a legislative body, who working together in a representative capacity, have all the power of appointment, all power of legislation all power to raise revenue and appropriate expenditures, and are required to create
a judiciary to pass upon the justice and legality of their governmental acts and to recognize
certain inherent individual rights.
Take away any one or more of those four elements and you are drifting into autocracy. Add one or more to those four elements and you are drifting into democracy.
Our Constitutional fathers, familiar with the strength and weakness of both autocracy and democracy, with fixed principles definitely in mind, defined a representative republican form of government. They "made a very marked distinction between a republic and a democracy and said repeatedly and emphatically that they had founded a republic."
A republic is a government of law under a Constitution. The Constitution holds the government in check and prevents the majority (acting through their government) from violating the rights of the individual. Under this system of government a lynch mob is illegal. The suspected criminal cannot be denied his right to a fair trial even if a majority of the citizenry demands otherwise.
Difference between Democracy and Republic, in brief:
Democracy:
a: government by the people; especially : rule of the majority.
b: a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections.
Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences
Republic
a: a government having a chief of state who is not a monarch and who in modern times is usually a president : a political unit (as a nation) having such a form of government.
b: a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law.
Democracy and Republic are often taken as one of the same thing, but there is a fundamental difference. Whilst in both cases the government is elected by the people, in Democracy the majority rules according to their whims, whilst in the Republic the Government rule according to law. This law is framed in the Constitution to limit the power of Government and ensuring some rights and protection to Minorities and individuals.
The difference between Republic and Righteous Republic is that in the Republic the Government rules according to the law set up by men, in the Righteous Republic the law is the Law of God. Only in the Righteous Republic it can truly be said "One nation under God" for it is governed under commandments of the only One True God and there is no pluralism of religions.
Autocracy declares the divine right of kings; its authority can not be questioned; its powers are arbitrarily or unjustly administered.
Mobocracy: 1. Political control by a mob. 2. The mass of common people as the source of political control.
Black, you are comparing apples and oranges here. You're trying to justify Obama's spending whatever money he's spending trying to hide his birth certificate AND his school records by saying, "What is Palin trying to hide because she's spending money on attorneys."
Here's the difference: Obama is spending money to hide the fact that he's not met the criteria for his position and also he's spending money because he doesn't want anyone to know what's in his school records, for whatever reason. (As an aside, this is the man who promised transparency in government....except for him.) I have my speculations on why he doesn't want his school records exposed.
Palin, on the other hand, is spending money to avoid losing lawsuits and ethics investigations by default, by not answering to allegations.
I look at the lawsuits thrown at Palin as a badge of honor on her behalf. Anyone who blows the whistle on as many politicians who were doing unethical things in Alaska is, of course, going to get this type of backlash. They are, of course, going to make sure that she pays dearly. This is their only recourse.
I was in government for 25 years. I know this is how the paybacks work. So everytime I hear of Palin getting ANOTHER lawsuit thrown at her AND it gets thrown out or the results are unfounded, I know that she really went after the big politicians and ruffled a LOT of feathers. That's the person I want handling taxpayer money. All the other politicians appear to be running on a greed mode and filling their pockets.
unlike morons like blackmonrikker
is Sarah has violated the law she would be hung out to dry. that is the difference between the left and right. the left protects homosexual pimps like Frank and other law breakers like the kenyan usurper
the right on the other hand would never allow a foreigner to undermine the office like you have.
No, the black idiot that trolls this site
csrbev writes:
"Black, I know you know this. You're trying to mislead people.."
carpenturr1
Of course we do, and no one believes the crook anyway, no one that is not here to lie for obama that is
csrbev
Carpenter, you mean no one believes the crook Obama?
Ooohhhh! Touchy about Sarah, much?
Hee-hee!!
All of you are too stupid to know when your chains are being pulled.
Black,
There's nothing stupid about defending someone who does the right thing like Sarah Palin does. Sarah brought forth some ugliness that was going on in the Republican Party, which is her own party, the Democrat Party and the oil business up in Alaska.
Sarah Palin is someone who I want watching over my taxpayer dollar. She doesn't cowtail to even the staunch cigar smoke blowers and she obviously didn't cowtail to the Liberals or Democrats. Sarah Palin keeps standing with her head held high while the Left and Democrats unsuccessfully try to disgrace her.
Csrbev, Did Sarah or did Sarah not say the following in support of TARP?
"That's why I say, I, like every american I'm speaking with, we're ILL about this
position that we have been put in where it is the taxpayers looking to bailout. But,
ultimately, what the bailout does is...help...those...who are concerned about the
healthcare reform that is needed....to....help shore up our economy..ummmm...helping the....
OHHH!! It's gotta be all about job creation, too, shoring up our economy and, and putting
it back on the right track. So healthcare reform and reducing taxes and reining in
spending has got to accompany tax reductions and tax relief for Americans and trade, we've
we've got to see trade as opportunity not as, uhh, uhh, competitive, ummm, scary thing but one
in five jobs being created, uhhh, in the trade sector today we've, we've got to look at that
as more opportunity, all those things under the umbrella of job creation. This bailout
is a part of that."
I rest my case.
UGH! I clicked the wrong handsign! This guy is an idiot... pay no heed.
rosepetal,
Thanks for your vote!! You're quote the smartie, aren't you?
Anyone can see that you are just trying to stir the pot. It's early here, and my vote was merely a slip of the hand... and exactly why I stated my mistake. As if these votes count for anything.
But just to be clear... I would NEVER vote for something so ludicrous, the mere notion is ignorant.
Yet you did vote for it. It must have been a Freudian slip. Deep in your soul you, too, must be wondering what Sarah is hiding by paying her lawyers vast sums.
All of us are.
It's a well established legal principle supported by most of the right wingers here. Guilt is directly proportional to the amount of money paid to lawyers.
Wouldn't it be easier to just pay $12 to Kinkos to make copies of the documents her tormentors are demanding? Why won't she do this?
It's obvious the documents don't exist. Either that, or she's hiding something.
You're just saying this because Sarah Palin is White.
If she were a half breed Kenyan you'd support her efforts to defend herself.
Oh, wait, that's why she is spending money, to DEFEND herself from FALSE allegations.
Barack Obama is spending money to prevent the truth. Obviously there is a racial standard here.
Don't question the black muslim.
"You're just saying this because Sarah Palin is White"
HeeEEEEEEEE-hee-heeeee!
HOO-HOO!!!
Yeh, yeh!! That's the ticket!! I'm a racist!!
No, you're an ignorant idiot... 'nuff said.
What is she hiding that's worth over 500,000???
Rosepetal!! Why would you denigrate my intellectual capacity and vote FOR my ideas?
Troll,, I mean blackmanlikker,,
Why don't you focus your attention on a real scandel?,,,,like this one,,
http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/20/americrooks-watch-meddling-michelle-obama-to-keynote-volunteerism-conference/
Instead of wasting your time stirring your own sh1tpot try defending this..
misdirection, rejean. Another time-tested birfer tactic. This thread is about Alaska's fu manchu, not that fine hamma in the White House.
I love when Bible thumpers are found guilty of ethics violations.
I don't really care about Sarah.
I love tweaking these twits with their own logic. There's nothing funnier than having them go on a rant, turn the rant against one of their own, and watch the "DuHH!!!!"s ensue.
Of course, they don't like it much. But I'm not really here to cater to their wants, capece?
I love when Bible thumpers are found guilty of ethics violations.,,Which ones was she found guilty of?
rejean,
I think she sanctioned fornication, an actionable sin, according to the Apostle Paul. Interestingly, the Bible never mentions abortion with same contemptuous language as it mentions fornication.
"Which ones was she found guilty of?"
The report said those contacts amounted to an abuse of power and a violation of the state's ethics laws, which prohibit using public office for personal benefit.
I even made sure it was from a source like Fox News!
http://origin2.foxnews.com/wires/2008Oct11/0,4670,PalinTroopergate,00.html
What a hoot
Obama supporters acting like they are concerned about ethics.
hehaw
Carpie,
We have to be concerned about something. If we were concerned about her brains, there wouldn't really an issue, would there?
If brains concerned you blackie, you would ask Sarah to give you some of hers
Blackmanlikker said - "I think".
Good One.What ethics law was she found giulty of?
Concerned about something? How about your beloved ACORN fraud staying hidden.You have no comment on the first Wookie's involvement? Oh wait there's more.TROLL.
ttp://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/22/project-vote-sues-whistleblower-obamacorn-bully-tactics-exposed/
Again,,Troll,, I mean blackmanlikker,,
Why don't you focus your attention on a real scandel?,,,,like this one,,
http://michellemalkin.com/2009/06/20/americrooks-watch-meddling-michelle-obama-to-keynote-volunteerism-conference/
Instead of wasting your time stirring your own sh1tpot try defending this..
I'm chock full Carpie. Couldn't squeeze in another ounce.
But YOU could use a few. Call her up and ask her to pontificate the next time you send in your Enzyte order.
rejean,
who the hell is Michelle Malkin? Is she a tard like you? Why would I consider giving her lies any credence over typical birfer lies?
Really, you must know I have to prioritize the lies I address. I'm REALLY much better than you are. Now run along. Wapner will be on in nine minutes. Start your countdown.
Moderator 2 hours ago
"I love when Bible thumpers are found guilty of ethics violations"...you like it when liars are fronted out?
OK then. Get the FVCk off this website you piece of SHlT. You have lied to everybody on here and you still keep that gay assed name too...did you apologize to Blackie for lying to him too? And now you have the nerve to come back on and call somebody a liar??? FVCK YOU...you hypocritical brain dead bastard.
Your just admitting the truth hurts bblackmanlikker.Your queen Wookie is as dirty as sh1t just like THE ONE.Birds of a feather are sh1t together.
"Why would I consider giving her lies any credence over typical birfer lies?"
She backs all her columns up with actual facts from actual sources and that bothers you to no end .Go find a rope.
Only thing you are full of blackie is shiet
Heee-hee-hee!!!
Stings a bit to be that stupid, don't it?
I really can't help you. I wouldn't if I could. I like watching you wallow in your own tardliness.
Rooster,
I've already put your intellectual dishonesty on display for everyone to see.
So just sit there, deny the antecedent and shut up.
This is a typical leftie reverse logic statement they are so fond of using. They cannot defend their own, so they either (1) smear the opposition they fear the most (Palin and Rush for example) or turn around any valid complaint against those on the left, as if it instead somehow applies to the accuser. It is the kind of logic we used on the elementary school playground, and it just tires me to see it again and again. The left is scared sh&*less of Sarah Palin, combined with the free opportunity in Alaska to throw out ethics complaints, makes it easy for them and just unfair for the accused. They have thus far all been thrown out. Alaska needs to rethink their policies and make it cost more to make false accusations. Like jail time.
Kitchman...Right On man, sounds like you agree with the intellectual third post on this boards comment section.
kichman,
Like most right wingers, you're wrong. The accusations against Palin are immaterial. I DON'T CARE.
I worded the post so that it sounds exactly like the repetitive idiot accusation that OBAMA must be hiding something because he pays his lawyers hundreds of thousands of dollars. Right wingers accept Obama's guilt-by-lawyer's-fees offense. But the same principle isn't true of Sarah Palin.
It's not the left's hypocrisy that is on trial here.
And rejean? STFU. I'm serious.
But blackmonrikker,
Obama IS hiding something. Nobody, I mean NOBODY goes to such lengths to seal their own birth and college records. Don't distract that fact, from the previous statement regarding Obama's overall costs for attorneys. They all spend money on attorneys. Bush and all of them. But nobody I can recall has spent money on attorneys sealing personal information that is not only required to even be considered for POTUS position, but is deemed public knowledge once such office is attained.
kichman
Blackie knows what you point out, he is part fo the problem that wants the truth buried
blackmonrikker wrote:
And rejean? STFU. I'm seriou
=====================================
Take a hike moron, no one cares what you got to say that wants the facts to be revealed, you stfu
Well to answer your post regarding the difference, between Palin and Obama is simple. Palin has actually been investigated
by the legal system for each and every complaint, and found innocent. But found guilty by the media and all those idiots who believe everything the MSM dishes out. Obama's birth certificate issue, despite being a big thing for the lefties back during the election with John McCain, got big press by the MSM. But now that the shoe is on the other foot, after those responsible to ensure laws were followed fell in love with their messiah, the MSM is completely reluctant to give any press to the issue, despite that it is 10 times bigger issue now that the office is filled, likely by a foreigner. They cannot even get billboard coverage by the big companies, CBS and the others despite our "freedom of expression" and "free press". States' attorneys general and federal judges are either looking out for themselves or looking for federal posts, and overlooking these complaints, despite their obvious merit. The supreme court has one suit now that may take hold, it awaits response from the defense, under time extension due a few weeks from now. Likely they will extend and extend till 8 years is up.
Remind me again how free we are.
kichman,
You must be new here. Point out the law he is breaking by sealing his records or, more succinctly, asserting his right to privacy. The laws are in his favor. Prior presidents released their records. Fine. No law said they had to. This president chooses not to release his records. Fine. No law says he has to.
I have pointed this out repeatedly. He is not violating any law in any state by asserting his right to privacy. CarpentAnt and rejean and the rest of the short bus crew know this. And yet they scream and holler as if his assertion of his basic rights as a citizen is somehow sinister.
No one is listening to these tards. Not even the kings of tards, Limbaugh and Hannity, give this story any credence. What does that mean to CarpenterAnt? "They must be in on the conspiracy."
You can't reason with retards. You can only insult them.
Probe: Palin abused power
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-10-10-palin-ethics-probe_n.htm
She's always in trouble. Don't let her anywhere near your credit cards.
If we really want to compare, we ought to compare what wingnuts got away with under Clinton, Bush II, and Obama.
Wow creep squiker your as bad as that dick head blackman likker.Your site referanced a fuccin story from October .Was probbably the first one dismissed . Why would I STFU nikker Your starting to implode.I want to help you grt there faster.HE HE HE stings a bit don't it .DICCHEAD
Doesn't sting at all. Tell us again about unemployment under Carter and Reagan.
Starting to implode? When have I been wrong, dumbass? I have a 100% RIGHT rate. I'm here to continue YOUR meltdown. There isn't any reason for ME to implode. My job is to gloat about the plethora of birfer idiocies that crawl the web everyday.
"I have a 100% RIGHT rate."..No you don't, and you knonw it. Sell it to somebody else.
When have I been wrong about anything birfer related? How about NEVER. Even your boy Tonchen backs up everything I've said. Anti-birfers the world over have YOU to thank for pointing out the only intelligent birfer on the planet.
Suck It TrollMore for the hardcore lefties to deny,ignore and blame somebody else.
Here is a few things Democrats are working on too.Gotta love them Haitians,Mexicans and Gut E-Verify,then it would be easier to get a drivers license
Why the hell WQOULD a guy from Hawaii care about secure borders.He lives on a crowded island , inside a special interest groups pocket,,
Senators introduce Legislation to Weaken Secure Driver's License
Standards
Last week, Senator Daniel Akaka introduced legislation entitled PASS
ID (S. 1261), a bill that would gut the REAL ID Act. Congress passed
the REAL ID Act in the wake of the September 11th Terrorist Attacks in
order to improve the security of U.S. issued driver's licenses. (Bill
Text).
Read the full article
http://www.fairus.org/site/R?i=VivB2p6Eqv6QxKbUrQgahw..
http://www.fairus.org/site/R?i=K0J3-NUIvMi6CdTHGUlUrw..
http://www.fairus.org/site/R?i=ENwKyR0L8LSWSZTImdzIRQ..
http://www.fairus.org/site/R?i=C38po2m2edo8lcb1_a4IlA..
ACORN -- http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/ACORN-drops-tarnished-name-and-moves-to-silence-critics-48730537.html
Walpin -- http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/How-Republicans-can-crack-the-AmeriCorps-scandal-48556282.html
Squeek Blackmanlikker got the sting
Is any of this birfer related? No? Really, it's just misdirection, isn't it, dumbass?
Yea Squeek Carter was ahero , ifyoulike gas line ups/rationing and hyper inflation . We'll be there soon dooooooon't chew worry.Reagan had balls.Kinda like the ones blackie licks.
Pretty much sums up your whole game,,diversion.Your GodLike picker is taken us down the tubes,Chicago style
Come on, dumbasses. Name one birfer court case that I didn't PREDICT the outcome of the case on the head. Name once where I ran afoul of U.S. law. Name one single legal venue that gives you hope that you can unseat the president.
You can't. You've been out-legaled and outsmarted at every turn. You are the Detroit Lions of litigation, the '76 Buccaneers. You suck. And you enjoy it.
Stings a bit, don't it?
I suck the life out of you.And your ignorant quest to defend your party.By being a single issue alsoran yourignorance shines . Shine on Shine ,
You suck something out of me, but it isn't life.
Gas lines started under Gerald Ford. There was no rationing under Carter. I think there was an odd/even system that wasn't enforced so it was pretty much voluntary. Inflation was high, as it was before Carter took office, but it never reached the definition of hyperinflation.
You have much to learn little one. You should read more and post less. Then you'll say less stupid stuff.
It's not your brain either
It's my ass, rejean. I tried to get you to stop, but you wouldn't listen.
That's not ass that's your life
Name a case that you've WON, dumbass. NAME ONE.
If you can name a single win, I'll STFU and never return. JUST ONE, sheis-4-brains.
rejean: "That's not ass that's your life "
You would make that mistake. Put your finger to your lips. Not put it under your nose.
Yeah. It's like that, rejean.
Your a single issue troll go bback to fields of love canal.Or step up and defend the first porch monk on any one of the things I posted .Even your white master at ACORN would let you do that.Oh waitr that's right they'd tell you to change your name and try again.
Sing me song while you shine
He loses the drill session so he plays the race card.
That doesn't work on me, rejean. I'm not a racist. I won't reply in kind, although I could.
Sniff your finger again. Now lick it. That's what your arguments are, rejean.
Reverend Sharpton,,I played no racecard Iasked to to say ANYTHING in defence of THEONE on ANY of the things I posted.Like Fred said COME ON DUMMY
No, you did, Mr. Duke.
I told you that you were inferior. The race card is where the inferior go when they've absorbed enough ass whippings that they can't think of anything else.
That would be grand master Duke to you .Now go wait for your reparation payment
grand master = sheis sucker.
You admitted you sucked something. I just clarified the substance for you.
Blackie, nothing that was posted by me ever proved you were right about a damn thing...sell that to your little fagget followers...creeksniffer and moderator too. Your little band of circle jerkers have shown nothing except that you are the pivot man.
I'm sure that in da hood that you are probably the best they got...but here you are nothing but a loud mouthed, self absorbed, beer belly, fat assed black man...I would say you were narcissistic but I already know you are fat so that can't be true. You and moderator have more than a few things in common. Self esteem would one of them...on here you think you are somebody but it is to make up for how you really are...lame and worthless.
I could go on for days about you and the middle child syndrome you seem to have...you are a middle child right? Didn't get enough attention as a child?
I don't answer your to post anymore because the subject are as lame as you are and I refuse to get roped into that BS.
You nkow as well as everybody on here that Obama will get booted or shot before his four years are up.
I know you just said, Oooo he just made a threat to Obama, baby hand me the phone...I am calling the FBI!!! YOu just said that didn't ya? Well I didn't threaten him but it is my prediction that is what will be done.
And you're too stupid to know your Klan-ese. It would be Grand WIZARD Duke, dumbass.
Really, can you generate enough wattage to animate that pus filled mass you call a body?
Lame ASS Troll answer any of the posting shine some light
Exactly what IS Sarah Palin hiding?
My sausage if she 'd only come back to NY!!
blackmonrickker:
Are you really that dense? She had to DEFEND herself against FRIVOLOUS suits brought by left wing Obamatbots...And guess what? All of the information regarding said accusations was laid out in front of a judge and she was found INNOCENT !!!
The difference here is Obama is spending millions to PREVENT the exposure of his BC...Sarah opened up her entire life to scrutiny and was found completley INNOCENT...
Obama is a liar.
rejean: "My sausage if she 'd only come back to NY!! "
And then what would she do with her OTHER nostril?
Birthers call lawsuits frivolous? There is no lawsuit more frivolous than Birther v. Obama.
No judge cleared Palin of anything. Let's see her secret E-mails she illegally sent.
And then what would she do with her OTHER nostril?
She could put Oblabla's credability there.
STOP responding to Black or Moderator...your responses just lead them on. NOT worth your keystrokes. Maybe if we ignore them, they will go away. (Kinda like a stray dog)
They don't have a damn thing to say worth hearing and when you pin them down on something they try to jump into something else rather than answer it.
I have called out Blackie on several points and he just wants to dodge the facts. Moderator went way out there and was telling everyone on this site that he was a REAL moderator until I fronted him out and proved him to be a fake. Moderator was even lying to Blackie by telling him he was going to kick somebody for him...and they have the nerve to call us names. Blackie bought into Moderators lies and had no better judgement than to believe him so that makes both of them idiots.
We are better than responding to any of them. That's what they want... to rile us. It's a NO GO for me. These post are for creative solutions to REAL issues, NOT trying to sling mud, like BlackMondumb-ass is constantly trying to do.
Like I said, IGNORE and the stray cats/dogs will go away. :)
what are you carping on about now, sh*tpetal?