The Elitists want a New World Order, One World Government. Do any of you know that the National Parks are collateral to the UN or that Bill Clinton made a deal with China and traded them (Cosco) our deepest water port, a naval base in California and that the Panama Canal is soon to be theirs too? Were we relieved that Hillary didn't win only to realize that she led us into a trap with Obama. Why did he make her Secretary of State after she was so nasty during the campaign. Doesn't this look like a conspiracy?
How is David Rockefeller connected to Panama? His family was one of the founders of The Federal Reserve Bank (the financial backer) and David was a member of COACT, a group responsible for changing the treaty we made with Panama. Jimmy Carter saved his career (with the Illuminati), US citizens were lied to and Panama is subject to more of the Red Chinese Communists.
Do you feel like a chess piece yet? This is a fraction of what has befallen us and hardly anyone knows or believes it. What can we do? We have to do something!
Obama did not set this site up to get helpful suggestions.
Comments (11)
what does this have to do with the PUMA birfer conspiracy??
Birferism is an invented lie.
It doesn't matter if the birther issue is a lie. It is unimportant in the grand scheme of things. Obama was groomed for the job and the powers that put him in position control everything. The birther issue is clouding the seriousness of this well planned destruction. Get past it! Come up with something constructive.
Bravo... Thanks for posting this!
Well, I just wanted you to know that. I don't post in threads about anything but birferism. You may have legitimate political reasons for questioning him (so do I), but the BC issue only makes YOU look like fools. It damages any credibility you may have with substantive issues.
It was you who brought up the "birfer" subject again. You're starting to sound like a broken record. Have you noticed that this issue is important to the majority of members who have responded on this site? We can each take small steps, in this case, ban together and force Obama to present his records. After that we can keep moving forward en mass. The birther issue has gone unanswered and has been protected/hidden by Obama and his staff. It may have started as a hoax (I don't know that it did or didn't) but Obama is hiding something and we need to take that into consideration. If he's hiding his records, what else is he hiding? We can't wait until it's too late. I'm taking Obama's example and getting on the swift boat in this case. I decided to prepare myself and my family for the emergency that I hope never happens.
And I'm going to continue sounding like a broken record. I've got a lot of ground to make up.
What are you trying to achieve?
Below is an earlier post I copied before...........The moderator decided to intercept it...
THIS IS A POST THAT WAS POSTED A FEW MINUTES AGO AND THEY DELETED IT.....THINK PEOPLE
gypsy_sage a few seconds ago Revise Flag
Looks Promising!
0
I'm Not So Sure... Pending Moderator Approval
PROPOSE A BILL THAT STOPs THE GOV FROM INTERFERING WITH CITIZENS HAVING THE MILITARY TYPE WEAPONS THAT THEY HAVE.....
gypsy_sage a few seconds ago Revise Flag
Looks Promising!
0
I'm Not So Sure... Pending Moderator Approval
It will kill 2 birds with 1 stone
1] It will insure us the same fire power the next time that a Katrina type situation happens.....So the military cannot tresspass,attack/victimize Americans in their own homes and,maybe it will cause the gov to focus on helping the citizens that are a few miles away dying.....from exposure ....instead of focusing on" Ok, now their down,how can we kick em"?
Why Is This Idea Important?
Because the people who stayed behind in their own homes, were victimized(while others were in dire need a few miles away) after Katrina shouldnt have been and it;s proof that it already happened which is, One Time Two Many.......
Idea # 4023Legal & Policy Challenges
Comments
Notify me via Email when someone responds or action is taken on this Topic/Idea
Why Is This Idea Important?
Why do you think?
Idea # 4024Legal & Policy Challenges
Comments
Notify me via Email when someone responds or action is taken on this Topic/Idea
If you do not know what happened after KATRINA...this is only some of it....Military were able to send men to pound on doors, attack those who didnt want to give up their guns....."their guns",drag people out of their properties and homes...."their properties and homes".
Many of the buildings were entered with their(the armed forces) guns already drawn.....obviously to terrorize....
Just before people were ORDERED OUT.....Or, dragged, or, attacked uncluding an old woman....who had a hand gun DID NOT THREATEN THEM WITH ITY ONLY SHWED IT TO THEM AS SHE WAS EXPLAINING TO THEM THAT SHE DIDNT WANT TO LEAVE HER DOGS......RIGHT before they jumped her....I mean attacked her.....Isnt that the "proper way to state it????? Anyway, people not too far away should have been helped..THAT SHOULD HAVE BEENTHEIR 1ST PRIORITY.....NOTHING ELSE SHOULD HAVE MATTERED...AND IF others had not have needed help............That still should have never happened....My point is very clear.........I believe that these people were waiting for a time of weakness....Sneaky prdators do that... Serial killers do that, communists and dictators have always done that...........Oh and by the way,both prties are mostly or all CFR members and that is one of the biggest problems,you now have sopempoliticians admitting that they are socialists.....We need to act its way too late for talking....This administration is bold and if any of them believe that this site will help with any good policy changes.They have to be willing to swallow their pride and realize they are on the payroll of the WHOLE PUBLIC .Not the ones they pick and choose.....I do not see that happening any time soon.....
Democracy Versus Republic
These succinct definitions of what is Democracy and what is a Republic was produced by the US Army in 1928, These definitions have been quietly withdrawn since, soon after.
Democracy:
A government of the masses.
Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of "direct" expression.
Results in mobocracy.
Attitude toward property is comunistic-negating property rights.
Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate. whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences.
Results in demagogism license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.
Democracy is the "direct" rule of the people and has been repeatedly tried without success.
A certain Professor Alexander Fraser Tytler, nearly two centuries ago, had this to say about Democracy: " A Democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of Government. It can only exist until the voters discover they can vote themselves largess out of public treasury. From that moment on the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that Democracy always collapses over a loose fiscal policy, always to be followed by a Dictatorship."
A democracy is majority rule and is destructive of liberty because there is no law to prevent the majority from trampling on individual rights. Whatever the majority says goes! A lynch mob is an example of pure democracy in action. There is only one dissenting vote, and that is cast by the person at the end of the rope.
Republic:
Authority is derived through the election by the people of public officials best fitted to represent them.
Attitude toward property is respect for laws and individual rights, and a sensible economic procedure.
Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed principles and established evidence, with a strict regard to consequences.
A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be brought within its compass.
Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy. Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment, and progress.
Is the "standard form" of government throughout the world.
A republic is a form of government under a constitution which provides for the election of:
an executive and
a legislative body, who working together in a representative capacity, have all the power of appointment, all power of legislation all power to raise revenue and appropriate expenditures, and are required to create
a judiciary to pass upon the justice and legality of their governmental acts and to recognize
certain inherent individual rights.
Take away any one or more of those four elements and you are drifting into autocracy. Add one or more to those four elements and you are drifting into democracy.
Our Constitutional fathers, familiar with the strength and weakness of both autocracy and democracy, with fixed principles definitely in mind, defined a representative republican form of government. They "made a very marked distinction between a republic and a democracy and said repeatedly and emphatically that they had founded a republic."
A republic is a government of law under a Constitution. The Constitution holds the government in check and prevents the majority (acting through their government) from violating the rights of the individual. Under this system of government a lynch mob is illegal. The suspected criminal cannot be denied his right to a fair trial even if a majority of the citizenry demands otherwise.
Difference between Democracy and Republic, in brief:
Democracy:
a: government by the people; especially : rule of the majority.
b: a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections.
Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences
Republic
a: a government having a chief of state who is not a monarch and who in modern times is usually a president : a political unit (as a nation) having such a form of government.
b: a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law.
Democracy and Republic are often taken as one of the same thing, but there is a fundamental difference. Whilst in both cases the government is elected by the people, in Democracy the majority rules according to their whims, whilst in the Republic the Government rule according to law. This law is framed in the Constitution to limit the power of Government and ensuring some rights and protection to Minorities and individuals.
The difference between Republic and Righteous Republic is that in the Republic the Government rules according to the law set up by men, in the Righteous Republic the law is the Law of God. Only in the Righteous Republic it can truly be said "One nation under God" for it is governed under commandments of the only One True God and there is no pluralism of religions.
Autocracy declares the divine right of kings; its authority can not be questioned; its powers are arbitrarily or unjustly administered.
Mobocracy: 1. Political control by a mob. 2. The mass of common people as the source of political control.
Apugh: "What are you trying to achieve? "
I'm trying to annoy you as much as you birfers annoy me with this crap. Birfers don't like having their arguments contrasted against the law. I dislike stupidity. When the stupidity goes away, so will the legal contrasts.
This topic is not about a frigging BC! Get with the program Blackmon! Spread your news in relevant posts.