OpenGov - Open Government Brainstorm

Do you really believe the Pres cares what you half dozen or so wingnut birthers think?

I did notice that most every post on this subject shows that the "birthers" have gotten the most votes in their favor...I guess that makes you the minority voice on this subject.

Ya'll just like to argue about it more than we do.

The "votes" on these things reflect only that about 95% of the people reading and writing on this thing are birfers and assorted other Obama-haters driven here by WorldNut Daily, who have nothing constructive to contribute, and who are clueless enough to reflexively vote for each others' garbage because they think anyone cares about their off-topic screeds.

A fine job you're doing trying to improve the government, morons.

I will accept the 95% number just because you used. The rest of what you said is nothing more than your opinion of those 95% that obviously cared enough to show up. Why did you come here? To call names is what I see you doing...that is not much of a contribution but if that is all you have then we'll have to accept it as your best thought.

Only 5% of your side cares to show up and be heard? Why do you think that is? Is the other 95% of your side too smart to show up and argue needlessly?

I didn't come here to argue. I originally came here to see what kind of good, constructive ideas my fellow citizens might come up with to improve the lot of all of us.

Instead, I find myself weeping for the future of our country when I see that a good experiment in collaborative government has been completely ruined by a small fringe of sore losers who have no good ideas of their own, and so don't want to see anyone else's. Nice work, morons--you must be very proud.

You can't see that ya'll are part of the supporting cast of people on here bringing it down as you claim. You want to believe that you are helping and doing good in some way...but you are not...you are just the other side of the problem you complain about.

So give yourself some thanks for chipping in too...and thanks for stepping others rights to be here and voice their opinions. I love the part where you want nothing but your kind on here so you have no opposing views to deal with...you will fit right in with Obama so why worry about who is on here.

>>So give yourself some thanks for chipping in too...and thanks for stepping others rights to be here and voice their opinions. I love the part where you want nothing but your kind on here so you have no opposing views to deal with...you will fit right in with Obama so why worry about who is on here.

How exactly have I stepped on anyone's rights? You're here, continuing to express your opinions (as irrelevant to the topic of the site and moronic as they are).

And if "my kind" means citizens looking for constructive ideas on how to improve the effectiveness of the government we all pay for, well, guilty as charged.

"when I see that a good experiment in collaborative government has been completely ruined by a small fringe of sore losers who have no good ideas of their own,"..you obviously are against anyone other than you and your kind posting on here...we do have the right to post here to...just like you do.

I don't care if you post on here...post all you want...i'll read it.

Well, BR, you're right for once...I am indeed against anyone other than citizens looking for, or suggesting, constructive ideas on how to improve the effectiveness of the government we all pay for posting here. Like birther jackasses, for example.

That was so creative...and funny. I really liked how you called birthers "jackasses"...my God how hilarious it that. It is great how you called others a bad name for giving their opinion about something that made you angry...that made you look cool to all of the other cool people on here that like it when you call people bad names for no reason at all.

What passport did UHBAMA use when he was shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi ? How did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later??? And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi , what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration? The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers. It makes the debate over UHbama's citizenship a rather short and simple one.

Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?

A: Yes, by his own admission.

Q: What passport did he travel

under?

A: There are only three possibilities. 1. He traveled with a U.S. Passport, 2) He traveled with a British passport, or 3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport.

Q: Is it possible that UHbama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981?

A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981.

Conclusion: When UHbama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport.

If he was traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And if he was traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove that he

relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967..

Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a "natural born" American citizen between 1981 and 2008.

Given the destructive nature of his plans for America, as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better.