I agree
Voting is Disabled

1 vote

I disagree

Rank3182

Idea#3778

This idea is active.
Legal & Policy Challenges »

Do Illegals Need Your Jobs?

Why Is This Idea Important?: Millions unemployed

I don't think so but apparently Obama wants to employ them before he grants amnista and healthcare.Millions of AMERICANS unemployed.A scam for a stimulas.

http://www.numbersusa.com/content/nusablog/beckr/june-11-2009/obama-ready-announce-his-surrender-big-business-lobby-and-gut-workplace-

Submitted by rejean 2 years ago

Vote Activity Show

Comments (8)

  1. rejean said:

    I sent the fax to my reps and then a bunch to others in congress.You should too.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  2. tsiya said:

    Obsma wants them because they are likely to support his agenda.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  3. apugh96 said:

    Allowing the Illegals in is a precursor to the Trilateral Union. Instead of worrying about Illegals taking your jobs, worry about the government selling your sovereignty. If we are concerned about foreign terrorists, why let our borders go unprotected? We are only looking at the trees. We need to look deeper into the forrest. There is an agenda that many people don't see. Open your eyes!

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  4. rejean said:

    I'd hate to think Canada would sign into this.I have'nt seen thier inclination too either.Have you?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  5. apugh96 said:

    Yes, Bush met with the Prime Minister of Canada and the President of Mexico before the North American Union bill was signed by all. Bush did this under radar as an executive order. The NAU is a spin-off of NAFTA and a precursor to One World Government. This is also in compliance with the Trilateral Commission founded by evil man David Rockefeller and his sidekick Zbigniew Brezenzski (who hand-picked Jimmy Carter AND Barrick Obama). These presidents were appointed not elected by the people.

    Here is a link to an account by Lou Dobbs:

    http://www.newswithviews.com/Wood/patrick18.htm

    There are many available sources about this.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  6. apugh96 said:

    I gave this post a positive vote and it registered negative. This isn't the frst time that this has happened.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  7. rejean said:

    Yep ,,it has happened to me too...that's how the white house runs an open government.just like there gutting of E-verify.Tacit support for ACORN and apologizing to the world for our decadent lifestyle.

    You'd think THE ONE would hold a televised presser and announce that he's all for Amnista.Earlier Today, House Appropriators Rejected E-Verify Amendments; Reps. Price,

    Obey, and Wasserman-Schultz Spoke Against These Provisions

    Earlier this morning, the House Appropriations Committee met to write

    the annual Homeland Security spending bill and the annual bill that

    funds Congress for the coming year. At the "mark-up," the

    Committee rejected two E-Verify related amendments to the Homeland

    Security bill and another related to the Legislative Branch spending

    bill. E-Verify is an electronically operated system that ensures

    American jobs go to American workers by allowing employers to quickly

    check the work authorization status of their new hires.

    Rep. Ken Calvert (R-CA) -- a true immigration reformer --

    offered an amendment to the Homeland Security bill to extend

    E-Verify. While that bill already contains a short, two-year

    reauthorization of E-Verify, Congressman Calvert knows the true value

    of the program and sought a longer extension of E-Verify. After

    Calvert spoke in support of his amendment, Appropriations Homeland

    Security Subcommittee Chairman, Rep. David Price (D-NC), spoke against the

    amendment. Rep. Price urged the entire Committee to vote

    against the amendment. Then, the Committee Chairman, Rep. David

    Obey (D-WI), spoke against the amendment, as well. Obey argued

    that the Homeland Security spending bill shouldn't contain an E-Verify

    authorization at all!

    Immediately following the rejection of the Calvert Amendment, another

    true immigration reformer -- Representative Jack Kingston (R-GA)

    -- offered an amendment to the Homeland Security bill to require

    companies who contract with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to use

    E-Verify. This common sense amendment would have ensured that contractors who

    do business with DHS -- the same agency

    tasked with enforcing our immigration laws -- do not hire illegal

    aliens. Congressman Price AGAIN spoke in opposition to the

    Kingston amendment, erroneously claiming that E-Verify is inaccurate

    and that the program would be unable to handle the expansion to DHS

    contractors. Even though Congressman Kingston pointed out that

    DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano stated last month that the program

    could indeed handle a large-scale expansion, and that the program has

    an incredible accuracy rate of 99.6%, the House Appropriations

    Committee still rejected the amendment!

    Later in the morning, Congressman Kingston attempted to attach a

    similar E-Verify amendment to the Legislative Branch spending

    bill. This provision would have required contractors who do

    business with the U.S. Congress to use E-Verify. This time,

    Appropriations Legislative Branch Subcommittee Chairwoman Debbie

    Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL) urged the Committee to reject the Kingston

    Amendment.

    In speaking out against these amendments, Reps. Price, Obey, and

    Wasserman-Schultz effectively urged their colleagues to not only put

    the E-Verify program in jeopardy, but also ensure that illegal aliens

    can continue to work on federal contracts with DHS and the U.S.

    Congress!

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  8. jduck9 said:

    I have a solution to our illegal alien problem.

    We need to pass the following laws.....

    1. There will be no special bilingual programs

    in the schools.

    2. All ballots will be in this nation's

    language.

    3. All government business will be

    conducted in our language.

    4. Non-residents will NOT have the right to

    vote no matter how long they are here.

    5. Non-citizens will NEVER be able to hold

    political office

    6. Foreigners will not be a burden to the

    taxpayers. No welfare, no food stamps,

    No health care, or other government

    assistance programs.. Any burden will be

    deported.

    7. Foreigners can invest in this country,

    but it must be an amount at least equal

    to 40,000 times the daily minimum wage.

    8. If foreigners come here and buy land...

    options will be restricted. Certain

    parcels including waterfront property

    are reserved for citizens naturally born

    into this country..

    9. Foreigners may have no protests; no

    demonstrations, no waving of a foreign

    flag, No political organizing, no

    bad-mouthing our president or his

    policies. These will lead to

    deportation.

    10. If you do come to this country

    illegally, you will be actively

    hunted and, when caught, sent to jail

    until your deportation can be arranged.

    All assets will be taken from you.

    Too strict?

    The above laws are current immigration laws

    of MEXICO!

    NOW, how can we get these laws to be

    America's immigration laws?

    WAKE UP AMERICA -

    We are losing our country..........

    2 years ago
    0
    0