I agree
Voting is Disabled

25 votes

I disagree

Rank1848

Idea#3758

This idea is active.
Legal & Policy Challenges »

Altering E-VerifyGood for You?

Why Is This Idea Important?: It's important to get as many low wage workers here to pay for the expanded government.

One of the few things the Bush administration did right on immigration enforcement was to strengthen and expand the E-Verify citizenship verification system for employers.

The Obama White House is preparing to gut the program.

Team Obama will repeal some of the Executive Orders from the Bush Administration dealing with E-verify and so-called “No Match” Social Security number notices.

1. In the case of companies that have federal contracts, the employer will not have to use E-verify to check the employment eligibility of his current employees, only new hires as a result of the federal contract.

a. So for example, X sweatshop could have 15 illegal’s working for them right now who are illegal. If X sweatshop gets a federal contract they will not have to verify the employment eligibility of those 15 illegal’s. So they will receive a federal contract and our tax payer dollars will go to paying the salary of illegal workers.

2. E-verify requirements will stay in place for new hires.

a. So if X sweatshop has to hire 4 more people as part of their federal contract they will be required to verify those workers.

3. DHS could also announce that it will rescind the No Match rule, which provides a safe harbor process for employers who receive a No Match letter from SSA, can follow in order to terminate the employee without repercussion. SSA “no-match” letters alert employers to the fact that they have submitted Social Security tax withholdings based on Social Security account numbers that do not match SSA records as to issued numbers and corresponding names.

The rule, which will be rescinded – proposed as a “safe harbor” for employers – steps to be taken when they receive a No Match letter from SSA. If the steps are taken for the employees who submitted suspect Social Security numbers and if the employer is later audited/investigated by DHS for hiring illegal immigrants, the employer can use the fact that he took the steps laid out in the rule as a defense to a charge of illegally employing those illegal immigrants for which the No Match letter was issued.

Businesses requested that such a process be laid out so that they were no longer subject to lawsuits.

Make sure your congressional reps have this on their radar screens: 202-224-3121

Submitted by rejean 2 years ago

Vote Activity Show

Comments (7)

  1. evreport said:

    Really? That's news. Obama's stimulus package required companies getting federal funds or tax breaks to use the E-Verify program. My understanding is they wanted to review it, but I haven't see where they want to "gut" it.

    Do you have a link?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  2. tsiya said:

    The democrats will get them registered to vote, no proof of citizenship needed!

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  3. rejean said:

    Any one of these or Michele Malkin

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  4. rejean said:

    Obama Administration Ready to Give Job Security to Illegal Aliens,

    Gut Rules Designed to Prevent Identity Theft by Illegal Aliens

    Earlier today, FAIR learned that in the coming days, maybe as soon as

    tomorrow, the Obama Administration will announce two regulations that

    will dramatically undermine immigration enforcement.

    The first regulation would gut a Bush Administration rule that

    required federal contractors -- paid with your tax dollars -- to

    use the E-Verify program to ensure that their employees are legally

    authorized to work in the U.S. FAIR expects the Obama Administration

    to gut this rule so that illegal aliens who are currently working for

    federal contractors will be able to continue in those jobs. This would

    give job security to illegal aliens who work for federal contractors

    instead of freeing that job up so that an American worker could be

    hired. Last week, the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced that 14.5

    million Americans are out of work.

    The second regulation would gut another Bush Administration rule to

    provide "no-match" notices to employers who have reported paying wages

    to people whose name and Social Security number don't match. As the

    Department of Homeland Security said in October: "One private study

    concluded that 'most workers with unmatched SSNs are undocumented

    immigrants.'" The Bush Administration proposed a rule to instruct

    employers how to deal with the "no-match" letters to ensure that

    employers don't continue to employ illegal aliens. By gutting this

    rule, not only would illegal aliens be allowed to continue in their

    jobs but the Obama Administration would also be turning a blind eye to

    those illegal aliens who are committing felony identity theft by using

    the Social Security number of an American citizen or legal immigrant!

    This sounds like a precurser to amnista.One of the few things the Bush administration did right on immigration enforcement was to strengthen and expand the E-Verify citizenship verification system for employers.

    Buzz on the Hill is that Team Obama will repeal some of the Executive Orders from the Bush Administration dealing with E-verify and so-called “No Match” Social Security number notices.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  5. rejean said:

    Federation for American Immigration Reform

    Earlier Today, House Appropriators Rejected E-Verify Amendments; Reps. Price,

    Obey, and Wasserman-Schultz Spoke Against These Provisions

    Earlier this morning, the House Appropriations Committee met to write

    the annual Homeland Security spending bill and the annual bill that

    funds Congress for the coming year. At the "mark-up," the

    Committee rejected two E-Verify related amendments to the Homeland

    Security bill and another related to the Legislative Branch spending

    bill. E-Verify is an electronically operated system that ensures

    American jobs go to American workers by allowing employers to quickly

    check the work authorization status of their new hires.

    Rep. Ken Calvert (R-CA) -- a true immigration reformer --

    offered an amendment to the Homeland Security bill to extend

    E-Verify. While that bill already contains a short, two-year

    reauthorization of E-Verify, Congressman Calvert knows the true value

    of the program and sought a longer extension of E-Verify. After

    Calvert spoke in support of his amendment, Appropriations Homeland

    Security Subcommittee Chairman, Rep. David Price (D-NC), spoke against the

    amendment. Rep. Price urged the entire Committee to vote

    against the amendment. Then, the Committee Chairman, Rep. David

    Obey (D-WI), spoke against the amendment, as well. Obey argued

    that the Homeland Security spending bill shouldn't contain an E-Verify

    authorization at all!

    Immediately following the rejection of the Calvert Amendment, another

    true immigration reformer -- Representative Jack Kingston (R-GA)

    -- offered an amendment to the Homeland Security bill to require

    companies who contract with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to use

    E-Verify. This common sense amendment would have ensured that contractors who

    do business with DHS -- the same agency

    tasked with enforcing our immigration laws -- do not hire illegal

    aliens. Congressman Price AGAIN spoke in opposition to the

    Kingston amendment, erroneously claiming that E-Verify is inaccurate

    and that the program would be unable to handle the expansion to DHS

    contractors. Even though Congressman Kingston pointed out that

    DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano stated last month that the program

    could indeed handle a large-scale expansion, and that the program has

    an incredible accuracy rate of 99.6%, the House Appropriations

    Committee still rejected the amendment!

    Later in the morning, Congressman Kingston attempted to attach a

    similar E-Verify amendment to the Legislative Branch spending

    bill. This provision would have required contractors who do

    business with the U.S. Congress to use E-Verify. This time,

    Appropriations Legislative Branch Subcommittee Chairwoman Debbie

    Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL) urged the Committee to reject the Kingston

    Amendment.

    In speaking out against these amendments, Reps. Price, Obey, and

    Wasserman-Schultz effectively urged their colleagues to not only put

    the E-Verify program in jeopardy, but also ensure that illegal aliens

    can continue to work on federal contracts with DHS and the U.S.

    Congress!

    We need you to call the following Members of Congress who spoke

    against E-Verify TODAY:

    Rep. David Price: (202) 225-1784

    Rep. David Obey: (202) 225-3365

    Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz: (202) 225-7931

    Tell these Members that they need to get their facts straight.

    Tell them:

    * 14.5 million Americans are out of work and millions more are

    underemployed.

    * Americans, not illegal aliens, should be hired for any available

    jobs.

    * E-Verify is highly effective, and it works to protect American

    jobs!!!

    * Congress needs to start standing up for American workers, and

    not special interests!!

    Also, please call Rep. Calvert and Rep. Kingston, and thank them for

    standing up on behalf of American Workers!

    Rep. Ken Calvert: (202) 225-1986

    Rep. Jack Kingston: (202) 225-5831

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  6. When Oracle Corporation, my last employer before

    retirement, STOLE MY IDENTITY and assigned it to one of

    their imported newhires from India, our CT SOCIAL SECURITY CONTRACTOR located and proved Oracle WAS the identity thief because Oracle's ANNUAL REPORT to Social Security, that is REQUIRED OF EVERY EMPLOYER, was found to be still using MY NAME, although I was living thousands of miles away. By "accidentally" reassigning my name to one of Oracle's new hires from India, I had suddenly lost all my medical coverage! By simply checking the annual report of current employees of Oracle, I enjoyed one of the fastest fixes to an Identify Fraud problem anyone had EVER seen! Clearly, I was not commuting to CA from the opposite (East) coast in retirement. Oracle treated the identity fraud as a simple "clerical" error on their annual report to Social Security. The Social Security representative and I called the Oracle Personnel Department together, to verify my identity identity and new East Coast address. It took only 3 days to restore my stolen identity due to the annual report to Social Security that is required of ALL EMPLOYERS. It sounds to me like "E-verify requirements" are also extremely IMPORTANT to prevent newhires from foreign countries from fradulantly assuming the identites of newly retired employees. -- Mary

    2 years ago
    0
    0