I agree
Voting is Disabled

-72 votes

I disagree

Rank31120

Idea#3750

This idea is active.
Making Data More Accessible »

OK, I've Been Toying Around with You Birfers. Here's the Scoop....

Why Is This Idea Important?: It's the truth about the birfers.

Look, I've been playing around with you guys. You've been asking questions, but you haven't been asking the right questions.

I KNOW that birfer issues are all fake. I don't imagine it.

This entire birfer story was concocted by PUMAS in Texas in June 2008. After Hillary lost the Democratic nomination, they got together and decided that Obama had no chance of defeating McCain in November. But they wanted to make sure it happened. So they dug around, trying to come up with some dirt on him. Ex-girlfriends, sex, drugs, homosexuality, whatever. They ran the gamut.

One PUMA, Linda Sue Belcher (nee Linda Starr) came up with Obama's Indonesian school records, noticed that Obama's religion was listed as Muslim and that his last name was listed as Soetoro. From this she concocted the 'born in Kenya' story and the Indonesian citizen story.

How do I know this?

A lawyer friend of mine SAT IN ON THE PUMA MEETINGS. She is a PJ poster. (www.politijab.com) Her online name is Allison. Her real name is none of your business.

This whole birfer story was supposed to be the Republican October Surprise. It wasn't supposed to be offered publicly until two weeks before the election.

But Linda Starr took the germ of the story to that legal genius, Phil Berg, and he ran straight to court with a half-cocked story before the details could be filled in. That's where the Dudley Doright BC came in. That's why he claimed he already had the Sarah Obama tape which wasn't made until late October.

But the news didn't break properly in August. The Democratic National Convention overshadowed it, then the Republican National Convention, then the economic crisis, then the Sarah Palin debacle.

By the time the story was ready to pull out of the oven, it was toast. Berg had screwed up the legal filings in his lust for glory and the opportunity to be "first". The October Surprise failed.

These people have been playing you birfers for months. They know this issue is a lie. But what the heck? Money is money, right?

I can back up EVERY SINGLE THING I HAVE SAID HERE.

Submitted by blackmonrikker 2 years ago

Vote Activity Show

Comments (196)

  1. madspartan said:

    Poppycock!

    Then he shouldn't have any problem practicing what the purpose of this medium is attempting to portray. Reveal to America his $20 long form birth record. End of story!!!

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  2. "POPPYCOCK!!!"??!?!

    What kind of cock is that? Are you an expert on cock?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  3. obot said:

    So Obama wasted over $1,000,000 of his campaign contributors money to help perpetuate a lie against himself?

    MORONIKKER, YOUR HATRED OF WHITE PEOPLE HAS SERIOUSLY AFFECTED YOUR ABILITY TO REASON.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  4. apugh96 said:

    Shut up about it then! This is not a game to many people and we don't like being toyed with, by you or by the government. You've made your point and I don't agree with it.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  5. You WILL admit that I know more about the history of this thing than any of you, right? I know the names. I know the dates. I know where the bodies are buried.

    Did you know Phil Berg's home is in foreclosure? And has been for almost a year? Did you know that your contributions to Obamacrimes.com are keeping ole Phil in his house, month by month?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  6. obot said:

    SO the WHITE HATER thinks that it's all a left-wing conspiracy theory.

    What a whacko nut job.

    Don't be surprised if you read about moronikker shooting up a white church somewhere.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  7. Hee-hee!! Obot!! Stings a bit, doesn't it?

    You know what I've said here is true. You've suspected it. Now you know for sure!!!

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  8. obot said:

    What you said about hating whites and the only reason you are making all this up is because Obama isn't white?

    YOU ARE A NUT JOB RACIST.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  9. dj-covfab said:

    Once again, you have tried diversionary tactics, and used unsubstantiated "knowledge" to try to discredit us "birthers"...I ask you, why then are you against having a full investigation and reporting...won't that just show how stupid and "used" we birthers are??? You should be screaming for the courts to do all they can to investigate and report, as we would then be proven as dumb as you guys think. You would gain immeasureable political clout from this!

    One final question...we birthers (note that there are several questions to be asked and answered, not just the BC issue)have a legal right to the proof of his being eligible to be POTUS (the burden of proof is on him)...where is your legal right (not opinion, not name calling,not smearing and marginalizing)to deny us our right?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  10. Hee-hee!! If I've said ANYTHING racist, please quote me. Citizen made me aware of some anti-black quotes I've made that, when translated, sound fairly racist. But other than that, Obot, kindly point out my anti-white statements?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  11. dj-covfab: "I ask you, why then are you against having a full investigation and reporting...won't that just show how stupid and "used" we birthers are??? You should be screaming for the courts to do all they can to investigate and report, as we would then be proven as dumb as you guys think. You would gain immeasureable political clout from this!"

    BECAUSE I DON'T CARE!!! Your issues are you own. I only visit birfer boards for AMUSEMENT.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  12. santorajj said:

    Hi again all. Man you guy are rough on blkmnkr. I still say he is wrong on this but he is also more articulate than most. Have you ever seen some of the anti-birther sites? They are 10 times more offensive than blkmnkr has been.

    And to you blkmnkr, why is Obama spending so much money on lawyers? And do you really think that "OILY" Berg and the rest of them want to make total fools of thenselves?

    I gotta get to the gig and play some jazz and forget about this stuff for awhile.

    "Symphony in Ebonics" Way cool blkmnkr!

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  13. apugh96 said:

    You are as much of a narcissist as the man you keep defending. When the country falls apart around you, don't be surprised. You help ensure that it happens by supporting the anti-Christ, Obama.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  14. santorajj,

    What I've said above is, unfortunately, true in every detail. Someday, in another post, I'll tell you how the libel lawsuit between Orly Taitz, Linda Starr, Phil Berg and Lisa Liberi came about. I know where the bodies are buried there, too.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  15. rejean said:

    Bmonrikkier,,

    C'mon man another"I said so,,,so it must be true" post.As I've been told, post your sources and we can all see.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  16. But the question remains, WHERE IS THE GOD DAM BIRTH CERTIFICATE? If it exists, it shouldn't be that hard to show it.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  17. P.S. Cite your sources. Just because you use names and dates doesn't mean they are correct and you know everything. There is this little thing missing called EVIDENCE. And I would say Obama not showing his birth certificate punches a big whole in you logic.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  18. rejean: "As I've been told, post your sources and we can all see. "

    LOL!!!!! I'd be happy to do that!! But even if the source was vouched for by GOD HIMSELF, you birfers would say, "Pshaw. That's fake. It's forged. Show us the REAL evidence!!! This isn't GOD'S handwriting at all!!!!"

    And besides, it's not that important to me. I just wanted you to know that I know the real story.

    When you see Linda Starr, ask her about Ted Nugent.

    Yeah! It's like THAT.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  19. So basically what you are saying is that you are just like any other monkey saying "I know the real story." And it's a logical fallacy to says 'I have the evidence but you wouldn't believe me.' Besides I'm not asking to produce something written by "god" I'm telling you to back up what you say since you said you could. If you can't do that then I just called you out for what you are..... just another monkey...

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  20. Let me ask you this, before I get down to presenting the hard evidence supporting the history of the birfer movement.

    Do you believe that both Democrats and Republicans caucus in smokey back rooms, strategizing about him to undermine their opponents? You MUST believe that. Otherwise, the term "october surprise" would not be a part of the common lexicon.

    Here's something else. When the birth certificate issue failed to fly, the Republicans pushed a McCain campaign worker, Ashley Todd, up to claiming that a black Obama supporter assaulted and defaced her at an ATM machine. When her story was debunked, the story FLEW from the news outlets and died on the vine.

    The Republicans really were desperate last year. Its not like they didn't try. Phil Berg just stole their thunder.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  21. And here's one more thing, you unconscionable hypocrites. When you first heard the birfer tale, how many of you asked Phil and Orly to PROVE it?

    Not one. You believed it because you had pre-existing issues with Obama.

    When I posted the logistics of getting back to Honolulu from Mombasa, Kenya in TWO DAY back in 1961, you birfers unanimously voted the thread down without offering a shred of counter-evidence. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN IMPOSSIBLE FOR STANLEY ANN DUNHAM TO MAKE THAT TRIP IMMEDIATELY AFTER GIVING BIRTH.

    But you'd already made you mind up, without a SHRED of evidence, that Obama was born in Kenya.

    You are the oil-slickest, smuggest, liars I've ever run across. Like President Obama, why should I go out of my way to provide you with evidence supporting truth? You haven't shown any regard for truth in the past.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  22. apugh96 said:

    M, you keep evading the issue. Is there a long-form birth certificate or not? Why is Obama paying a legal team to deny access to his records? What are these smoke and mirror tactics hiding? Why did I have to show mine to get a driver's license and he doesn't have to show his to qualify for his job? The more he hides, the more distrust builds against him. It doesn't matter how the question came up. It did and Obama hasn't given the correct answer. He gets an "F" for that.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  23. First of all I could care less about parties. Dems and Reps are two wings to the same bird. Its a puppet show, and you dance to it.

    Secondly, I raise the question about Obama's birth because of LACK of evidence. Why doesn't he show it? If he has NOTHING to hide then where is it? It's not just his birth certificate either. There is also the question about school records. etc etc. I can only come to the conclusion that these items do not exist if HE DOESN'T SHOW THEM.

    My pre-existing issue with Obama came from the fact that every member of his administration have ties with big bankers that come right outta wall st. My issue with Obama is his obvious path down Fascist lane he's taking us. And if you deny that then you just aren't paying any attention. I'm not some mindless sheep following some guy with a microphone and teleprompter spitting out words about 'change'. Either he proves that he is natural born as stated in the Constitution or he steps down from is illegally held office. This is a LEGAL issue.

    So, do you have his birth certificate? If not, then I must kindly ask you to STFU.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  24. tsiya said:

    Show us the beef!

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  25. carpenturr1 said:

    What a moron you are, besides being a extreme racist.

    blackmonrikker writes:

    And here's one more thing, you unconscionable hypocrites. When you first heard the birfer tale, how many of you asked Phil and Orly to PROVE it?

    ==========================================

    You ignorant moron, both these people understand this question has not been settled and want the Court to hear the facts and be the trier of facts.

    You are such an idiot

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  26. This is funny... squirm, birthers, squirm... you all know he's got you at every turn- you've been trying to win this same argument for days now...

    ROFLMMFAO!!!

    "You are such an idiot"

    "Show us the beef!"

    "I'm not some mindless sheep following some guy"

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  27. tsiya said:

    Why are you so sure all of us are white? Tsiya is Cherokee. I don't care what color Obama is, I want to see a valid birth certificate. It is my legal right to question things.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  28. apugh96: "M, you keep evading the issue. Is there a long-form birth certificate or not? Why is Obama paying a legal team to deny access to his records? What are these smoke and mirror tactics hiding? Why did I have to show mine to get a driver's license and he doesn't have to show his to qualify for his job? The more he hides, the more distrust builds against him. It doesn't matter how the question came up. It did and Obama hasn't given the correct answer. He gets an "F" for that. "

    HOW MANY EFFING TIMES DO I HAVE TO ANSWER THIS GD QUESION!!!!

    Not this time. Go do your own homework. I've answered every single one of these questions numerous times in other threads. THIS thread is about PUMAS INVENTING AN OCTOBER SURPRISE. I'm not going to let you ignore that truth away by whining about a cookie that's already been presented.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  29. tsiya: "Why are you so sure all of us are white? Tsiya is Cherokee. I don't care what color Obama is, I want to see a valid birth certificate. It is my legal right to question things."

    Other than mentioning my own race, I haven't brought up race in any of my posts, except by way of response.

    You do have a legal right to question things. Mr. Obama also has the legal right to ignore your questions. Your only recourse is to vote against him in 2012. The ONLY people who can boot him out of the presidency now is Congress. I'll give you a thousand dollars if you can point out a single congressperson or senator who pays heed to birfer ideas, and says so publicly.

    You don't have a single vote.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  30. rejean said:

    Bmonrikker You sir are a shiite disturber of the third class.Still more of the I have inside info party line."I say it so ,,, so it must be true"

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  31. rejean: "I say it so ,,, so it must be true"

    Oh I can prove it alright. But, if I remember correctly, I've been demanding to see a smoking gun for a week now. And not one of you birfers has stepped up to the plate.

    This time I'm going to let YOU stew. I'll TRADE evidence and proof with you. I won't give it away for free.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  32. tsiya said:

    We aren't going to drop this, it's going to spread until it can't be covered up any more.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  33. Not one of you have commented on or disputed a single fact in my timeline. Several of you have gone ad hominem. Carpenturr1 is sitting at his keyboard masturbating like a monkey. Obot is preparing for tonite's big hoe down. Rejean is trying to figure out what to say next.

    But none of you can dispute my timeline or the facts presented. Whereas, I've been ripping ass on birfer myths for a week now.

    Come on, ladies. Step up to the plate. Throw up your hands. Lets go toe to toe. The Magic/Lakers game doesn't come on for a couple of hours.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  34. "We aren't going to drop this"

    BFD. You've made some stunning inroads so far. And your record in court is astounding. And just yesterday you people logged your first kill.

    You must be so proud.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  35. tsiya said:

    He is a democrat.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  36. carpenturr1 said:

    Your rants are enough to undermine your credibility.

    No need to use your gutter language and be a fool as you have proven yourself to be by what you post here.'

    Keep up the good work moron

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  37. Where's the smoking gun?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  38. blackmonrikker:"Carpenturr1 is sitting at his keyboard masturbating like a monkey. Obot is preparing for tonite's big hoe down. Rejean is trying to figure out what to say next."

    You forgot- Yeti is laughing his ass off at home in mommy's basement.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  39. Yeti, you can jump in any time here. In a minute I'm going to go over to PJ and have Allison weigh in over here. If you think I'M bad, Allison is a legal ballbreaker. She is the cat's meow. She'll have these birfers steppin' and fetchin' like a bunch of New Orleans whores.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  40. apugh96 said:

    Blackmon, Good question. Where is the proof that a BC exists? That would be the smoking gun. We aren't trying to prove he doesn't have it. He needs to prove that he does. He is being opaque, not transparent at all. He is feeding speculation.

    You aren't the only one has researched this.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  41. THIS is the proof that a BC exists:

    http://www.fightthesmears.com.php5-9.websitetestlink.com/images/28.jpg

    Whether it exists is not in question. The State of Hawaii has already verified that it exists.

    The question is, which law will you use, as an ordinary citizen, to demand to see that which no law allows you to see? (He said knowingly for the thousandth time).

    The image posted above is NOT legal tender. But it is an accurate rendition of a valid BC. YOU, and the other birfers, are demanding to see the paper original.

    WHAT LAW COMPELS HIM TO SHOW IT TO YOU?

    If you can just name the law, I PROMISE I'll get Allison over here and show you proof of the PUMA story.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  42. djamieson said:

    blackmonrikker-

    the burden of proof is on Obama, not the "birthers". McCain had to provide documentation to Congressional committees when his eligibility was questioned, and so should Obama.

    If we have no case, why are you so adamant to take the other side..you are disingenuous.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  43. "the burden of proof is on Obama"

    NAME THE LAW WHICH PLACES THAT BURDEN ON HIM. HE IS NOT ON TRIAL ANYWHERE EXCEPT IN THE COURT OF BIRFER OPINION.

    Given you miniscule demographics and the fact that one of your brethren murdered a security yesterday, I think Obama's position if safer than safer. That is, unless he goes to lunch with one of YOU guys.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  44. My head's just not in the game today- got too much actual work to do to spend time trying to talk fools out of their follies.

    Enjoying the show, though.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  45. man, my typing is starting to suck. I meant to say "security guard" and "safer than safe".

    Carpenturr1 may be right. I am displaying all the tendencies of a keyboard afflicted moron.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  46. Oh wait. I didn't see this one:

    "If we have no case, why are you so adamant to take the other side..you are disingenuous."

    What makes you think you have a case. Let me flip the script. How do YOU envision this whole birfer thing playing out? Let's assume Phil Berg gets into court and they agree to hear his evidence?

    What then?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  47. apugh96 said:

    Blackmon, I'm convinced. You changed my mind based on hearsay. I now think that you are delusional. I used to think that you had a narrow mind but it appears that you need mental attention! Good luck in getting help. With the new socialized medical plan, it may take a few months before you get admitted!

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  48. apugh96,

    Delusional? Do I believe in a man who offered a BC signed by Dudley Doright to a federal court?

    No. But you do. Which one of us is delusional?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  49. rejean said:

    Yes BmonRikker,,delusional,,Especially when you lump anyone who calls your turd wrapped in sugar .A turd.

    Or anybody else here who has an opinion about your GOD is now associated with a neo nazi murderer.You are forked in the head.On an aside your daughter will do well to follow in the path of Will Wolford at Vandy.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  50. apugh96 said:

    I don't believe Dudley and I don't believe you. This can easily be cleared up by forcing Obama into court to show that he is qualified to hold the job. Whether or not he is good at it is another issue that he will also have to prove.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  51. This will never be heard in a court because these cases are frivolous. The cases have no legal basis, the plaintiffs have no standing. These absurd cases will continue to be dismissed and denied.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  52. Oh man, you people are in trouble now. Allison is here. I'm going to lean back. Now I get my chance to chuckle....

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  53. For the record, y'all, Allison is a full out lawyer. AND a Mensan. AND she's a member of 7. You people are in the presence of royalty.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  54. Rikker, I see little to nothing posted here by these birthers that is worthy of a response, and nothing posted by any of these birthers that demonstrates even the most basic comprehension of how the US Judicial system operates... *yawn* How very sad, as always.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  55. yeh, I've been teabagging them and smirking about it. Not one of them has stood up and offered a single legal reason why Obama ought to respond to anything they say.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  56. Oh, well, I am sure they think he should respond because they said so...and, because they don't like him. Luckily, we have laws here that generally result in frivolous cases being dismissed. All these ridiculous "birther" cases have been dismissed so far and will continue to be over and over and over as long as they keep filing them! What an absurd waste of the courts resources and time, it really is shameful.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  57. I think if we get Tes and BogusInfo and LM K and Dr. Conspiracy over here, these birfers will fly from this site like rats. They are already looking for shelter from you. I warned them that you were da bomb.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  58. apugh96 said:

    Lawsuits concerning this issue have been dismissed but public awareness is growing despite the stonewalling.

    Nice talk Blackmon! You just gave away your sexual peferences!

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  59. Allison?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  60. Sorry to burst your birther bubble, but public awareness of this issue is NOT growing, and if the issue is getting any play at all it is only play as a joke and a laugh. This is simply the latest nut-job conspiracy and any rational person can, and does, see as much.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  61. and yesterday's murder pretty much means that any mention given the birfers is negative. If you thought you were marginal before, wait until the MSM gets thru associating you with James von Brunn.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  62. Allison, give them the rundown on the PUMA underpinnings of the birfer movement.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  63. Seems to me that those few loonies still buying into this garbage now have a tough choice to make. Continue on this ridiculous and insane crusade and allow yourself to condone, by association, the actions of the worst of your idgit hate-mongering, lunatic fringe crowd, or stand up, climb out of the rabbit hole and see reality, and spend your time organizing for the candidate of your choice in 2012. Put this idiocy behind you, nothing good can come of such stupidity.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  64. Rikker, for the full PUMA story, I would direct them all to yestodemocracy, where the entire history is covered. Suffice it to say, it was revealed that PUMAs were, at least at the higher levels, Republicans or Republican operatives simply using Hillary supporters to do their political bidding...PUMA was never meant to be about Hillary, it was meant to split the Democratic party and insure a Republican win...and, it did not work out as they had hoped. Thank God for that!

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  65. tsiya said:

    Yesterdays murder was committed by a DEMOCRAT.

    If there is nothing to hide there should be no problem showing the world a valid birth certificate and school records.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  66. tsiya,

    Yesterday's murder was committed by a racist birfer.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  67. chirp. chirp. chirp.

    Mighty quiet around here. You birfers had a whole lot to say earlier. Are you cowards as well as loonies?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  68. Rikker, as usual, when they are confronted with law and facts they run for the hills, clearly knowing they have neither on their side. LOL

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  69. That's sad- come on, birthers, 29 minutes and no post? You finally coming to your senses?

    carpenturr?

    tsiya?

    anyone?

    echo (echo) echo (echo)

    Cock a doooooodle doooooooooo!?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  70. tsiya said:

    I haven't gone anywhere. I'm waiting to see the birth certificate. You may think you've won something, but that's just your opinion.

    You know what everyone says about opinions, don't you?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  71. well, tsiya, you have one so I can only guess....

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  72. Allison: If you are still here, could you help me with a piece of ammo I'd like to hurl at the Birthers?

    The other day, in a major Hawaiian newspaper, the lady in charge of their birth certificate operation said the Supreme Court ruled that Hawaii's current certificates were acceptable. Would you happen to know the citation for the case?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  73. hairlip said:

    Blackmon....

    Is Allison your Sister or Mother???

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  74. tsiya said:

    It will sort out, you can't hide the truth forever. The backlash will be so much fun it's worth waiting for.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  75. sparkey909w said:

    So say you're right blackmonrikker. Its all made up stories, a Hilary fable..Why have lawyers block it then. Obama came to power on the platform of a new era of openness and change..said he was going to lay open the Govt books for all to see. All I see him do is protect his ass when it suits him and spout off about how Muslim he is when the campaigns over and hes in a foreign land. The only positive thought I have is that Oblahblah will not be in my life 8 yrs from now, Im hoping for only 4yrs but there are so many sheeple who worship at the alter of his Barrackiness that I'm not gonna hold my breath. Please just answer the 1 quest. "Why hide it using lawyers" instead of give me a paragraph about how great Obama is..We all heard that before..but we havent heard about our own President's true past.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  76. Black mambo and yeti now that gives all you normal people this sicko picture here. I will say this, as Obama continues to NOT do the Jews bidding... his backers and REAL masters will out him themselves... just sitting back and wainitng... oh and hey mambo why don't posse up and collect that $25million reward for documents or proof it does exist, even Columbia records (showing he applied as an alien for college money) should get you $5mil?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  77. carpenturr1 said:

    creeksneakers2 writes:

    Allison: If you are still here, could you help me with a piece of ammo I'd like to hurl at the Birthers?

    ===============================================

    Why would you need ammo for hallucinations?

    That is what all you anti"birthers" call this/

    Do you need some ammo to show Mickey Mouse is not a real person too?

    Your fear of this question is what all of you ant"birthers" are showing.

    Be afraid, its not going away.

    And if it makes you nervous, get ready for a nervous breakdown

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  78. sparkey909w said:

    Pointless to even comment about blackmonrikker..what is your little sissy at a big girl blog telling you the inside scoop. Heresay I think its called.. Your whole story is OH! I heard this and OH!I heard that..then when confronted with a point you call people names like a little infant.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  79. photosrme said:

    Oh brother...

    This comes from a person who says he went off the Grid. Yet he is still connecting to the Internet.

    RoFlMAO

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  80. OK, I'm back girls. I notice none of you, not one, has dared to actually PROVIDE any information. You're all still croaking like baby vultures about receiving something from our president.

    Chirp, chirp, chirp. President Obama? Are you listening?

    Nope. This isn't going away, Mr. Obama!!!

    Chirp, chirp, chirp.

    Are you listening, Mr. President?

    Chirp, chirp, chirp.

    WHERE'S THE LONG FORM VAULT COPY!!!!

    Chirp, chirp, chirp.

    Dang.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  81. Blackmonrikker: BAAA BA BAA BAA BAAA BBBAAAA BAAA BAA BAAA BA.

    BAA BA BA BAA BA BAA BAAAAAA BA BA! BA BAAA BA BAA BA? BAAAA BAAA BAAA

    BA BA BAA! BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

    Sheeple....

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  82. Ba Ba black sheep has you any wool?

    Yes sir yes sir a nickle bag full.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  83. chirp. chirp. chirp.

    My guy is sleeping in the White House tonite. And you guys are standing around measuring the size of your turds.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  84. I just read about half (couldn't read any further) of the civil case between Berg and Taitz- they are quite the crowd... My mind is blown.

    Birthers, this is must read material for you- this is who you are putting your faith in as the savior of the Republic? The champions of the Constitution?

    Any of the birthers on here calling anybody else "sheeple" need to take a long hard look in the mirror...

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  85. Yo, Yeti. 'Sup?

    Don't bother pointing these birfers to the lawyers that are representing their cases. They don't really want to know. They don't care about winning these cases. They just want to whine like beyatches. "Where's the long form? Where's the long form?"

    Did you ever see such a bunch of useless lumps in your life?

    Let them whine.

    It goes against my grain to just let them take over this site though.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  86. carpenturr1 said:

    I think all the sane people should just ignore this lunatic

    blackmonrikker

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  87. Harold Pack said:

    Like Obama backs up his claim to natural born American? With stonewalling, BS and an obvious fake COLB.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  88. What is so hard about proving that you are from the U.S.? Why does he avoid it. He's even trying to make it illegal to look into his records. This has nothing to do with race. This is about rule of law. Why does Obama keep portraying America as a Democracy. We are a Constitutional Republic.

    Even if he was born in the U.S. it still doesn't change the fact that he's fascist now does it? Why isn't he even listening to real issues like the Federal Reserve and how its raping America for the interests of Big Bankers. Why is misleading American's saying capitalism does not work while in reality we haven't been capitalists since 1913? Why is perusing the same foreign policy as Bush? Why isn't he repealing the Patriot Acts 1 and 2 when they clearly violate the constitution, the law of the land? Why are we still in two non-winnable wars: the war on the idea "terrorism" and the war on drugs? Why is he only helping the top 1% elites?

    So yeah, if there is speculation that Obama is not even from the U.S. I want him to prove that he is. Otherwise why even have laws? Its called common sense.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  89. carpenturr1: "I think all the sane people should just ignore this lunatic"

    Dang. Only the sane? I was hoping to get YOU to start ignoring me, too, carpenturr1.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  90. rikker-

    The takeover of this site is what got me fighting these ass-hatted windbags in the first place- up till 6-1-09 I had no idea a "birther" existed- honestly.

    From that point on I have been essentially hooked on bashing them whenever I have a spare moment. The more I learn about the absurdity of their "cause" the better it gets.

    carpenturr-

    rikker is trying to get all of you to ignore lunatics. You really should listen to what he has to say, or else wind up with plenty of egg on your face.

    Ever read up on borderline personality disorder?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  91. Yeti: "wind up with plenty of egg on your face..."

    Wind up with egg on their faces? These people are forehead deep in sewage and can't tell the difference!!!

    Look at the facts: Their whole argument is "If he didn't have anything to hide, why won't he release the BC"

    And they repeat this canard ad nauseum.

    Have they gotten any closer to their goal? No.

    Is anyone really listening to them, other than other birfers? No.

    Is Right Wing Radio listening to them? Rush? Hannity? David Duke? Oscar Meyer? No.

    Does President Obama spent a single iota of his day looking at birfer issues? No.

    Has any one of them articulated a strategy for seeing the vault BC other than to invent laws that OUGHT to be in place? No.

    Do they stand a chance in hell of influencing the 2012 election at this rate? No.

    Will the Republican party accept them as a viable sub-group in 2012? What, and risk association with James von Brunn? No.

    So what are their chances? None.

    Ah well. I enjoy toying with them. It's my wicked little pleasure.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  92. And to think they call us sheep...!?

    I have to admit I like the "Show us you papers!" posts- for whatever reason I hear it in the guard's voice from Hogan's Heroes.

    I really had no idea that this birther sh*te existed until last week- so, so much for a growing majority or we the people. I just got pissed that they were blocking access to the folks who actually wanted to engage in the stated goal of the site, and figured I could bytch them into submission. So here I am- still bytchin'...

    You know the Republican's aren't going to touch this- not with a 10' pole held by a Democrat. Having your name anywhere near this would be political suicide- like putting your name to the "truthers" arguments or any other hack conspiracy.

    Von Brunn didn't even need to stamp his name on it- it had no credibility before him, but now it's publicly tied to that evil old sh*tbiscuit- so it's completely untouchable even to the quietly prejudiced who might have (slim chance in a racist wet dream) considered it beforehand.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  93. Funny how von brunn was a neo-Nazi. It's also funny that nazism isn't right wing, its left wing collective nonsense giving power to the state.

    Faux News, CNN, MSNBC, ABD, CBS all crap. Keith Oberman, Anderson Cooper, Glen Beck etc etc etc, all crap.

    Can you please tell me why Obama is doing nothing different than bush!?!

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  94. 1W/Force,

    Nah, not tonite. I feel like talking with someone with some original, intelligent ideas. That wouldn't be you.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  95. Just because they aren't original doesn't mean they aren't intelligent.

    What is unintelligent about shutting down the federal reserve our nations central bank which is a private company. Actually its a "public-private partnership"(just a fancy way of saying Fascist)?

    Or how about ending the war on terrorism and drugs?

    What about raising concerns about having over $11 trillion in debt and raising over $3 billion a day and by printing press?

    I think you have already proven that you are not capable of observing reality as it is nor do you know anything about the proper role of government. But that is quite alright, run away.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  96. Actually, Force, those aren't bad topics. Lets talk about drugs.

    I've said I am a Libertarian. I don't believe the government should legislate what citizens consume. If I want to eat Comet cleanser all day, I should be able to. If I want to inject heroin all day, ditto. The only thing they should legislate is the SALE of drugs, which I think should be banned. If I grow my own heroin, then it's my ass.

    I also think the govt should deny medical benefits to long term smokers, alcoholics and drug abusers after, say, their third strike. Addicts should pay 100% of the bill from that point on.

    What say you?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  97. (Over-eating is also an addiction which the govt should not subsidize. Put that in there, too)

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  98. Before I get back to work, I gotta say- I agree with all but the last part. On the grounds that I don't feel like the govt has any say in my medical benefits in the first place.

    Are you talking about people with govt benefits or people with private insurance?

    At what point would you draw that line?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  99. I somewhat agree but I think there should be some common sense to the sale. Marijuana should be regulated by sale with similar laws as alcohol. By regulating drugs you take the profit out of underground cartels and criminals hands. That would also help keep drugs out of the hands of children because the store clerk cares about age, you would have to show ID. Slick Rick on the corner doesn't really care about age.

    I would have to disagree about making addicts necessarily paying more although I can see the logic behind it. And it should cost more, but I think there should be better more reliable and efficient methods of treatment, physically but more aimed at mental treatment. I think its a health issue not a legal one. All in all it would cost more medically speaking.

    Someone who comes home and has a a nicely rolled blunt full of northern lights #15 is not necessarily an addict and is not a criminal. There really needs to be a re-scheduling of drugs.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  100. samlowry said:

    Before we show you the birth certificate, show us the lawsuit that's based ONLY on the birth certificate.

    Phil Berg would say, "OK, he was born in Hawai'i, but he lost his citizenship in Indonesia when he was adopted."

    Orly would say, "Yeah, and anyway his dad was a citizen of the United Kingdom, and you must be born on U.S. soil to two U.S. citizens."

    Both those are lies, too, but that's not the point. The long-form, vault copy birth certificate wouldn't satisfy any of these barking moonbats. So what's the point of showing it? Is the president of the U.S. supposed to cotton to a pack of barking moonbats?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  101. Foggy!! WASSUPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Allison and RealityCheck were here last night. And now the Fogster. Oh man, this board is in trouble. CHIRP!! CHIRP!!! CHIRP!!!!! Ignorance can only exist in a vacuum. When the light shows up, the roaches will scurry under the sink.

    Yeti, I wasn't talking about private insurance. I was talking about Medicaid. I don't think that Medicaid should subsidize any diseases which are directly linked to addiction. On the third visit, if the problem persists, the government should just say "Pay that bill yourself."

    If you have private insurance, fine.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  102. ericettinger said:

    So we should believe a lawyer, YEA RIGHT. Scum suckers are not believable. They will say what ever they need to to get what they want. Just like politicians or police. they all lie.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  103. No, I'm not asking you to believe the lawyer who sat in on the meetings. You don't believe the Hawaiian DOH officials, why should you believe a mole lawyer?

    I've got WAY better evidence of the PUMA conspiracy for an October Surprise than that. Come on, what did you take me for?

    Look, I know that every one of you birfers know in your hearts that what I have said is true. It's how politics works. The Dems shanked out a dirty laundry list on McCain too.

    But it is the Republicans that have raised the "last minute race card" to an art form. Swift boats. Karl Rove. Willie Horton. Lee Atwater.

    This "He's NOT a citizen" strategy might have worked if (1) it was true or (2) Phil Berg hadn't shanked the rollout so badly with bogus data. Phil's early filings were a symposium in incompetence. Just about everything he filed was a thinly veiled lie. No reasonable person would look at a BC signed by Dudley Doright and take the lawyer who filed it seriously. His early mistakes so muddied the waters that no one was willing to listen to his later logical stretches.

    By the time October rolled around, the Republican hierarchy was fuming about his performance. They hastily arranged to have a white woman, Ashley Todd, falsely claim that she had been attacked by a black Obama supporter at an ATM.

    But it was too little, too late. This glaring attempt at stirring up latent racial passions failed miserably. And Senator McCain, who is a good man and a solid American patriot, was staring at a king hell loss at the polls.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  104. I'm sorry but the point remains that he hiding his records and wont let anyone look into them... I don't like McCain because he is no different than Obama or Bush but he did show his records no problem. So you can quote Phil, Linda, whoever the fuk you want but it still is just hearsay. I have to show my papers for stupid crap, so its perfectly reasonable that Obama prove that he is the legal president. If he was born here, fine, but like I said before, it still doesn't change the fact that Obama and his admin are fascist fuktards. This is not based on race, for the last time it is the law of the land, the rule of law.

    I am also sorry that the majority here want Obama to prove his position, the votes speak for themselves.

    I am not a republican nor am I a democrat, I am independent and if there was a white fascist douche bag in office I would also want him to show his papers as well. Don't blame me, I voted for Ron Paul.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  105. And this doesn't mean posting a picture of a birth certificate online, anyone can do that. The internet is not real life. He needs to prove his citizenship to the congress and the people.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  106. Force: "This is not based on race, for the last time it is the law of the land, the rule of law."

    I'm glad you said that. STANDING IS the law of the land. You have none. Case closed.

    Force: "He needs to prove his citizenship to the congress and the people. "

    He has already conformed to the requirements of the law. I have asked you to point out which law he is out of compliance with. There isn't ANY law that says he needs to show his BC to birfers, or any other U.S. citizens. John McCain and Hillary Clinton have seen and accepted his BC. Case closed.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  107. What? You make no sense. Maybe you should think next time you start drinking the kool-ade and fluoride water...

    The Constitution is the law of the land. Period. It states you have to be a NATURAL born citizen. Now, we are asking him to prove it. Unless he can prove it he is breaking the law. Its not about there being a law about showing a BC, the BC would just prove it. And shame on you for posting a pic of that forged document. John McCain and Hillary Clinton do not represent the people in this matter. Sorry case not closed. McCain and Clinton are not a trial.

    Not to mention the fact the Obama, McCain, and Clinton care all CFR members. All three are in the pockets of corporate douche bags and big bankers. I could care less if they accepted it or not.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  108. Force: "Not to mention the fact the Obama, McCain, and Clinton care all CFR members. All three are in the pockets of corporate douche bags and big bankers. I could care less if they accepted it or not. "

    And they could care less about your opinions about U.S. law. The difference between you and them is that they are in a position to do something about it. And all you can do is whine until 2012.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  109. I suggest reading the Constitution and brushing up on your history. But I understand, you went to public schools.....

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  110. Yeah pretty much the only thing I can do is whine.... unless people wake the fuk up and realize they are getting raped

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  111. I HAVE read the Constitution, Force. While it supplies the criteria for vetting presidents, it doesn't say a word about how to get or verify that data. Other laws have been written to handle those issues. The Constitution SUPPORTS THE PEOPLE WHO WROTE THOSE OTHER LAWS.

    So if you claim the Constitution doesn't support Obama, it surely support the SCOTUS, which supports the STANDING doctrine which you despise. And the Constitution supports the rights of the state of Hawaii to gather and maintain birthing records on its citizens.

    Not surprisingly, the Constitution doesn't say a word about private citizens having the rights or ability to demand to see the president's private data. Amd not surprisingly, none of the people supported by the Constitution can point to any laws along those lines, either.

    That's why Obama is able to successfully ignore you. He's got the backing of the Constitution.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  112. I never said the Constitution said anything about making obama show his records. The BC would just prove it. What I said was the Constitution says only natural born citizens can be president. Go back read my posts more carefully.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  113. louannbyrd said:

    If it's all a lie, then just show the records. Why are all his records unfindable or closed?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  114. To me it shows he's hiding something by not releasing them. If you want to quit heating the whining about the BC tell Führer Obama, SIEG HEIL, to show them.

    Its rather simple really.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  115. tsiya said:

    blackmonrikker

    The Constitution does not empower the federal government, it limits federal government, and assigns duties to it. It also limits democracy. Maybe that is why you have problems with it.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  116. Yeh, it IS simple. It's a lot simpler to just tell you birfers to go sit and spin.

    I'm glad you admit he is acting within his rights. The law says his Hawaiian BC makes him NBC. The State of Hawaii backs his Hawaiian BC. The Constitution backs the State of Hawaii.

    Who's backing YOU?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  117. The Constitution still backs me. As well as the majority of the people.

    He has not proven his citizenship, period. And that must really bug you.

    Not to mention he is not even America's 1st black president. Is only 6.25% black, 12.5% is the minimum required to legally claim any racial status in the U.S. He is 50% white, 43.75% Arab. He only has one black great-great-grandmother on his father's side while the other 7 were Arab. Funny how that same grandmother says she was present at his birth IN KENYA!

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  118. Force,

    Wow. You're really out there, aren't you? What does his racial composition have to do with Constitutional law?

    I like your numbers, though. Mark Twain was right: "There's lies, damned lies, and statistics." You've managed to post all three.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  119. carpenturr1 said:

    Statement;

    "AFFIDAVIT OF REVEREND KWELI SHUHUBIA

    I, Kweli Shuhubia am over the age of eighteen (18) and not a party to the within action. If called to do so, I could and would competently testify under oath as follows I am an ordained minister of the gospel of Jesus Christ and a native evangelist and translator for the Anabaptist churches in Kenya. I am the official Swahili translator for the annual Anabaptists Conference held each year in Africa, working with the American bishops sitting upon the Continental Presbytery of the Anabaptists Churches of Africa. I am fluent in Swahili and in English. I am a former teacher in Kenya, and travel

    extensively in the ministries of the Anabaptists Churches of Africa throughout Kenya, Uganda and the Sudan.

    It is common knowledge throughout the Christian and Muslim communities in Kenya that Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., the United States Presidential candidate, was born in Mombosa Kenya. Senator Obama's grandmother still resides in the village of Alego-Kogello, approximately 37 miles from Kisumu City.

    During my interview of Sarah Obama; I called Bishop Ron McRae in the United States from my mobile number. I advised Bishop McRae that I was present with Ms. Obama in her home, and wished for him to speak with her. Bishop McRae informed me he would call me right back, to avoid the international costs on my personal mobile phone. Bishop McRae subsequently called me back; Bishop McRae requested permission to electronically record his telephone conversations with Ms. Obama, to which I agreed.

    Due to bad telephone connections Bishop McRae had to call me back three [3] times, before we were able to continue our conversation. The telephone interview conducted by Bishop McRae was conducted on loud speaker (speaker phone). During the interview conversation, one of Ms. Obama's grandsons's and myself acted as Swahili translators, and as Bishop McRae talked to and questioned Ms. Obama, we would translate what Bishop McRae said to Ms. Obama in Swahili, and then we would translate her Swahili responses to Bishop McRae in English. Ms. Obama can fluently speak Swahili in her native dialect, but cannot read or write.

    Bishop McRae asked Ms. Obama specifically, "Were you present when your grandson Barack Obama was born in Kenya?" This was asked to her in translation twice, and both times she specifically replied, "Yes". It appeared Ms. Obama's relatives and her grandson, handling the translating,, had obviously been versed to counter such facts with the purported information from the American news media that Obama was born in Hawaii. Despite this, Ms. Sarah Hussein Obama was very adamant that her grandson, Senator Barack Hussein Obama, was born in Kenya, and that she was present and witnessed his birth in Kenya, not the United States. When Ms. Obama's grandson attempted to counter his grandmother's clear responses to the question, verifying the birth of Senator Obama in Kenya, Bishop McRae asked her grandson, how she could be present at Barack Obama's birth if the Senator was born in Hawaii, but the grandson would not answer the question, instead he repeatedly tried to insert that, "No, No, No.

    He was born in the United States!" But during the conversation, Ms. Sarah Hussein Obama never changed her reply that she was in deed present when Senator Barack Obama was born in Kenya."

    http://www.obamanotqualified.com/grandmother.htm

    See ya all in Court

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  120. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!

    No. We'll see YOU standing outside a courtroom screeching about standing!!!

    You can't even wipe your ass with that affidavit. It isn't even valid as toilet paper.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  121. Truth Seeker said:

    This is horribly unsophisticated and clumsy obfuscation in a shortsighted attempt to distract or derail everyone from the uncomplicated and succinct request of disclosing the LONG FORM!

    The quintessential point here is that this is NOT an extraordinary or unreasonable request! However, what IS extraordinary and unreasonable is the lengths to which you (blackmonrikker) and other "Obamites" will go to continue these stalling tactic through marginalizing, intimidating, ridiculing and the outright lying about something which would be quickly and confidently dispatched by the simple act of disclosing the requested documents. This issue is NOT going away.

    You (blackmonrikker) are actually INCREASING the number of "Birfers" by this childish tactic which everyone can see is as transparent as a 5 year old child changing the subject when asked about stealing a cookie. The more you obfuscate and distract, the more attention you call to it.

    Just show us the damn Birth Certificate!

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  122. Still doesn't change the fact that Obama is Fascist along with his commodore of elitist now does it? Which is treasonous by the way.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  123. "You (blackmonrikker) are actually INCREASING the number of "Birfers""

    I'm TRYING to increase your numbers by taunting you. If your support dries up, who will I have to laugh at?

    Come on. Get with the program.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  124. tsiya said:

    People with marginal intelligence are easily entertained.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  125. Actually, tsiya, people at both ends of the Bell curve are entertained by the same things. I'm at the very far right end of the Bell curve, so far right that you can't tell the curve from the asymptote.

    So you're right, even if you weren't intentionally right.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  126. carpenturr1 said:

    This guy blackmonrikker is an internet thug, a keyboard tough guy, a complete idiot.

    Waste of time responding to this moron, just flag him for his trolling the board

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  127. tsiya said:

    Yeah, Von Brunn was a Mensa member too! Functional intelligence isn't the same as raw test scores.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  128. "Von Brunn was a Mensa member too!"

    Really? I never saw him at any of the meetings...

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  129. And it STILL doesn't change the fact the Führer Obama is fascist....

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  130. carpenturr1: "This guy blackmonrikker is an internet thug, a keyboard tough guy, a complete idiot."

    Aw shucks.... you're joshin' me.

    I would like to know your position on the Bowen vs. Keyes case. It appears your boy Keyes has got to pungle up some money!! AND WAIT A MINUTE!! I'D SAID OBAMA HAD PAID LESS THAT $10K ON BIRFER FEES!! THAT'S INCORRECT!!! THE PLAINTIFFS ARE PAYING HIS LAWYER FEES!!!! OH MAN!!! IT DOESN'T GET ANY BETTER!!!! TALK AMONG YOURSELVES!!!! I'm DYING HERE!!!!!!!

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  131. That must really piss you off that the guy fooled you with his "change" act through microphone by teleprompter then gets in office and does the same ol' same ol' big govt, big spending fascist bull crap.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  132. tsiya said:

    Rectal defilade is known to obscure vision! The surgeon general should look into this,it affects millions of democrats.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  133. Truth Seeker said:

    "I'm TRYING to increase your numbers by taunting you. If your support dries up, who will I have to laugh at?"

    As expected, your only weapon is intimidation through ridicule. This probably worked for you in middle school but is ineffective when confronting adults armed with reason.

    It is implicitly doubtful that ANY of this is laughable to you since you have invested so much time and effort into explaining why you believe the "birfers" request is invalid.

    Your admission to tsiya was a puerile redefining of the common meaning of "marginal intelligence" into your own nonsensical and twisted illogical one. Which, ironically, validates the point.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  134. "As expected, your only weapon is intimidation through ridicule. "

    No. Ridicule is the only thing your ideas have earned. I don't need to try to intimidate you. You are already afraid of me.

    When you muscle your ideas up a bit, and add some common decency, legal precedent and a dab of strategy for success, you will graduate from ridicule to egalitarianism.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  135. well the numbers speak for themselves blacksheep, you idea sucks, -41 and falling....

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  136. Force, go vote down my Keyes vs Obama thread, too. It only goes to show that, next to hydrogen, stupidity is the most prevalent element in the universe.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  137. What is so stupid about wanting Obama to prove his citizenship?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  138. ericettinger said:

    I have tpo agree with you about the supidity is the most prevalent element. Look who you idiots elected. lmao

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  139. Truth Seeker said:

    blackmonrikker,

    "To a carpenter with only a hammer, everything looks like a nail."

    Your only retort to ANY discussion on this topic is to ridicule. The reason you use it is to devolve any valid points into a sophomoric "Is TOO! Is NOT!" argument. This is your safety zone and continues to be your ONLY option (barring any REAL disclosure of the long form).

    All you have as an intellectual ploy IS "ridicule" (which attempts to intimidate and shutdown any further debate) you NEVER offer the one thing that would completely and totally shutdown this entire debate. The TRUTH in the form of a document (i.e., a long form birth certificate).

    Why is that?

    The one thing that would be obvious to even a child is that you clearly aren't intimidating anyone here.

    The difference between the things you say and what others are saying here is that you constantly use dismissive words and ridicule as a response which is about as meaningful as saying, "because I say so!"

    I don't care about arguing the validity of law suits or the ability/inability of anyone forcing this issue before a court. It's immaterial to the moral implications of disclosing the truth. If he is qualified, where's the birth certificate showing the hospital and doctor? Where is it?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  140. rocky: "I don't care about arguing the validity of law suits or the ability/inability of anyone forcing this issue before a court."

    And that's why you are backing a loser. You fail to respect the deciding medium. And you fail to strategize about how to use that medium for your own benefit.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  141. Like the court system is fair now-a-days, have you not been listening? Obama's admin is fascist just like the admin before it.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  142. Yawwwnnnnnnnnnnn.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  143. Truth Seeker said:

    As my statement clearly implies, I'm not backing ANYONE! You are arguing with the wrong person over this issue.

    As I stated, the suits are immaterial to the moral implications of disclosing the truth.

    I'm not strategizing anything. I respect the truth and can recognize a liar when I see one. This is apparently a big game to you (and other Obama adherents) as you continually seek to "counter" every dissenting voice with the ill-conceived "strategy" of ridicule and BS. I'm only seeking the truth. Is he or is he NOT a Natural Born U.S. Citizen and where is the legal proof?

    Obama's Natural Born status has been called into doubt through the lack of ANY legitimate or legal evidence verifying it as well as witnesses (family and foreign elected officials) claiming he was born in Kenya or gave up his Natural Born status by dual-citizenship. The Certificate Of Live Birth (whether real or not) is not a valid and recognized legal document for government posts (even in the State of Hawaii). Legitimate United States Citizens across the country are simply requesting him to "verify" his legal status and end all doubt.

    The longer he ignores and ACTIVELY resists this request (through suppression of documents), the more suspicious he looks.

    Where's the damn Birth Certificate?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  144. Rocky: "As I stated, the suits are immaterial to the moral implications of disclosing the truth."

    Your morals are your own. They don't even enter into this equation.

    Rocky: "This is apparently a big game to you"

    Very true.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  145. tsiya:

    The constitution created government. Its a compact between the people and the government. There are limits to what the government can do in it. But the first primary purpose was to create a stonger federal government after the Articles of Confederation failed.

    The parts that limit government just get talked about more.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  146. blackmambo, 'in the meeting huh' I think you are a plant and not doing a very good job at it!... very transparent. There may be no verbiage for proving citizenship and there is also none that states the opposite... so it will the hammering away of the people who get to the truth, or the real puppet masters will out or oft him because he is no longer doing their bidding... who's bidding?, We all know who the real honchos are.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  147. carpenturr1 said:

    "blackmambo" is a good name for that snake.

    This question is growing stronger and stronger with every mocking, with every sneer, with every refusal.

    Its a cover-up

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  148. Yes! I ADMIT it's a cover up!! And I know where the bodies are buried!!

    Oh, lawdy, CarpenterAnt!! Don' tell de PO-leece!! I ain't birthin' no babies!!!

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  149. When liars or puppet masters are cornered they resort to stupid replies, happens every time and you can bet a pay check on it

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  150. I'm not going to bet you one of MY paychecks. Why should I take a half year's pay from you? Your kids would be pissed at me.

    I'll bet you one of YOUR paychecks. That way, when your NAMBLA bill comes you can explain to them where the money went. They won't come after me.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  151. "ridicule is the only weapon that can be used against unintelligible propositions. ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them."

    — thomas jefferson

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  152. carpenturr1 said:

    “Ridicule is the first and last argument of a fool”

    Jefferson was talking about about you, but in your case you're so stupid no one needs to ridicule you.

    Your own posts do it for you, stupid

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  153. au contraire, monsignor dummy. He was talking about people who fail to articulate a compelling argument when they are being sh*t upon.

    I've been dumping on you all day, Mr. Gump. And you ain't responded with compelling argument the first.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  154. This has been a good day. Not only have birfers lost two most lawsuits, but I've proven conclusively that these birfer lawsuits aren't costing the president a dime. That three birfer lies exposed in one day.

    WHEN IS KEYES GOING TO GET AROUND TO PAYING OBAMA'S LEGAL BILLS?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  155. When is obama gonna get around to paying our debt and stop selling out America?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  156. Just as soon as Alan Keyes cuts him a check for the money he owes.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  157. In other words, never...

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  158. tsiya said:

    Obama isn't fit to shine Doctor Keyes shoes!

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  159. Be that as it may, Keyes owes Obama a cool $520. And he owes Biden the same.

    And here's something I haven't said since yesterday afternoon:

    I TOLD YA SO.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  160. tsiya said:

    It's not over yet!

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  161. It's been over for quite some time!!! I'm just one of those people who likes to stand around and watch the bodies rot!!!

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  162. lmeditato said:

    The Conservative (and it still is, until Sotomayor is confirmed) Supreme Court have already said that they will not hear the Birth Certificate case because Hawaii Health Department Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino and the state's registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, have checked health department records and have determined there's no doubt Obama was born in Hawaii.

    Even Mr. McCain said that he believes Obama is eligible to serve as President. Protesting that he hasn't showed anyone his birth certificate is not only incorrect, but is also a distraction from real issues.

    A lot of you are saying that "all Obama has to do is show me his Birth Certificate". But be honest, even if he did, even if you physically TOUCHED it, you would STILL protest, coming with rationalizations for why it would be fake, because the fact is that Mr. Obama has already given plenty of evidence that has been accepted even by the Republican National Convention.

    So I submit that no amount of true evidence in the world could convince you. You would still cling to your unsubstantiated beliefs, no matter what, even if the answer were right in front of your face. That, my friends, is what we call "insane".

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  163. tsiya said:

    If he didn't have anything to hide he wouldn't be so busy hiding things.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  164. carpenturr1 said:

    100 percent untrue, this is not what was said, but it shows the willfulness to distort what was said to keep the truth buried as long as possible.

    ===============================================

    lmeditato writes:

    The Conservative (and it still is, until Sotomayor is confirmed) Supreme Court have already said that they will not hear the Birth Certificate case because Hawaii Health Department Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino and the state's registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, have checked health department records and have determined there's no doubt Obama was born in Hawaii.

    ===========================================

    100 percent blatant lie

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  165. carpenturr1 said:

    Fukino does NOT say.

    She does not say that the image of a COLB published by Obama on his “Smears” site is accurate.

    She only verifies that Hawaii has Obama’s "original birth certificate."

    She never said he was born in Hawaii.

    She only verifies that Hawaii has Obama’s "original birth certificate."

    She only verifies that Hawaii has Obama’s "original birth certificate."

    His sister Maya, who was born in Jakarta Indonesia has one exactly like the one on the internet

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  166. lmeditato said:

    Yes, because the state keeps a record of all people born in that state. It's the law.

    You cannot use a negative of a statement as evidence, because it goes both ways. You are correct in saying that Fukino did not say that the COLB Obama posted is accurate. But she also did not say that it was INaccurate, either.

    See http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wYOqE4H4V6U/SQ9jk0XwP8I/AAAAAAAAAZY/_LDcULdVwoc/s1600-h/08-93.JPG

    You better have a source to back that last statement up.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  167. carpenturr1 said:

    lmeditato

    Obama's sister Maya was born in Jakarta Indonesia.

    She has an identical certification that she was born in Hawaii just like the one Obama used on the internet.

    (made public and now refuses to show it)

    What Fukino said about what is there can also be said about Maya's.

    Even though Maya is known to have been born in Jakarta Indonesia.

    It has to do with the laws of the State of Hawaii that allowed this sort of certification.

    But is still not the original that Fukino honestly can say is on record, it is.

    This is not disputed.

    What is disputed is the claim she said he was born in Hawaii or the internet document is authentic

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  168. carpenturr1 said:

    http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/vital-records/hawnbirth.html

    Who is Eligible to Apply for the Issuance of a Late Birth Certificate in Lieu of a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth?

    The Certificate of Hawaiian Birth program was established in 1911, during the territorial era, to register a person born in Hawaii who was one year old or older and whose birth had not been previously registered in Hawaii. The Certificate of Hawaiian Birth Program was terminated in 1972, during the statehood era.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  169. carpenturr1 said:

    http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/vital-records/hawnbirth.html

    Any person to whom a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth has been issued may submit a request to amend an entry, including a legal change of name, on an existing Certificate. A request to amend a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth will, however, be considered to be and treated as an application with the Department of Health for registration of a late certificate of birth in current use, unless a standard birth certificate for that person already exists in the vital records of the Department of Health. Should there be a situation of dual registration, the requested amendment will be made to the standard birth certificate on file if the required documentary evidence in support of the amendment has been submitted and evaluated to be adequate.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  170. carpenturr1 said:

    http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/vol06_ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0017_0008.HTM

    [§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State. (a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.

    (b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.

    (c) The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  171. carpenturr:

    I don't believe allowing amendments to birth certificates means that they allow fraud. The same for the certificates issued to children born elsewhere. It is possible to get a new Hawaiian certificate, but if the person wasn't born in Hawaii they won't issue one that says the person was.

    Amendments are for situation like a child born to unmarried parents who married shortly after the child was born and the child goes his entire life using his father's last name but then runs into conflict because his mother's name is on the birth certificate. That's the kind of thing they allow you to amend.

    I'd like to see more about the Maya matter.

    I've been reading about which hospital Obama was born in and its the most interesting issue I've seen so far from the birthers. Do you guys have anything, like a letter or a newspaper article from a normal publication, that quotes either of the hospitals as flat out saying Obama was NOT born there?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  172. carpenturr1 said:

    It was not fraud, its perfectly legal

    READ IT

    [§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State. (a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.

    (b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.

    (c) The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]

    [§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State.

    [§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State.

    [§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State.

    The only fraud would be to have been born outside of Hawaii and had used this law for a COLB and then use that document to keep the truth buried.

    Which is what I believe is happening

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  173. lmeditato said:

    Source, carpenturr1, source. Or if you don't have a primary source, I want to know who told you. Basically, I've seen a lot of crazy conspiracy theories that are being spread via chain emails and talk radio. Prove to me that this isn't the case with your information.

    How do you know that her certification is identical? How do you know that what "What Fukino said about what is there can also be said about Maya's"? Have you seen both? Or have you been told all this by someone who is, realistically, just as capable and willing to manipulate you as Obama is?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  174. On an issue as pivotal to Barack Hussein Obama's Constitutional right to be President of the United States, such as whether or not he is a "natural born citizen" of the United States as required by Article II Section 1 of the U.S.Constitution, there is no room, no leeway, for debate, speculation, or opinion: only Proof. No sane Barack Hussein Obama would spend over $1 Million in legal fees, with three separate law firm, trying to defeat and dismiss dozens of law suits that have been launched in many different forums seeking this Proof. A sane Barack Hussein Obama would produce the Proof that he is a "natural born citizen:" UNLESS, OF COURSE, HE IS NOT A "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN," IN WHICH EVENT HIS RESISTANCE TO EVERY ONE OF THESE LAW SUITS AIMED AT SEEKING PROOF OF HIS "NATURAL BORN" STATUS MAKES PERFECT SENSE.

    Common sense dictates that Barack Hussein Obama, by his own actions, is Constitutionally unqualified to be President of The United States pursuant to Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.

    Amen.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  175. carpenturr:

    Its not fraud for Hawaii to issue a birth certificate to someone who was not born in Hawaii. In fact, your link shows that.

    The news certificate Hawaii issued would be an official state birth certificate, but it would list the out of state place where the birth occured under place of birth. It would not fraudulently name Hawaii as the place of birth if that wasn't true. Do you see the difference?

    Suppose Delaware allowed anybody from any state to get a Delaware driver's license. Say you are from 2104 Birther Street in Lexington, Kentucky. Delaware might issue you a valid drivers license for driving in Delaware, but your true address would be listed. They would not fraudulently make up a place in Delaware for you to use as your address.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  176. Joan Riverside:

    That's the same thing as it would be if a cop wanted to arrest you for something you didn't do, and that the cop had no evidence for, and the cop said, "Why do you mind being arrested if you have nothing to hide?"

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  177. tsiya said:

    Maybe if I had reason to trust him more I might trust him on this. He swore to protect and defend the Constitution, and then began to walk all over it, so I'm not likely to believe much that he says in the future. I wasn't surprised, he has a long history of disrespect for the Constitution.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  178. carpenturr1 said:

    Just got back and seen this

    ================================================

    lmeditato wrote:

    Source, carpenturr1, source.

    ============================================

    What?

    I gave the link for the law, what you need son?

    =============================================

    lmeditato wrote:

    Or if you don't have a primary source, I want to know who told you.

    =============================

    Huh?

    What are you going on about?

    You are not making any sense

    Obama is the primary source that inspires the questions.

    Obama's stonewalling and hiding all his records is what is the source of the questions.

    Anyone who is not trying to aide a cover-up knows Obama and his actions are the very source for the questions.

    =============================================

    lmeditato wrote:

    Basically, I've seen a lot of crazy conspiracy theories that are being spread via chain emails and talk radio. Prove to me that this isn't the case with your information.

    ========================================

    So have we all.

    You seem to be very confused here too.

    We are here asking for transparency in government and the Obama admin live up to its billing.

    Get focused lmeditato, ask Obama why he is hiding all his records, not just the BC.

    lmeditato, Obama is the subject, not the questioneers, capiche?

    ==============================================

    lmeditato wrote:

    How do you know that her certification is identical? How do you know that what "What Fukino said about what is there can also be said about Maya's"? Have you seen both? Or have you been told all this by someone who is, realistically, just as capable and willing to manipulate you as Obama is?

    ===========================================

    Its explained in what I already have shown.

    You give me the feeling you are not interested in uncovering any information about Obama and are content to see him get by with stonewalling normal routine everyday questions.

    Show us your records, birth, school, passport and adoption with the name change

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  179. carpenturr1 said:

    creeksneakers2 writes:

    carpenturr:

    Its not fraud for Hawaii to issue a birth certificate to someone who was not born in Hawaii. In fact, your link shows that.

    =========================================

    Exactly right

    ======================================

    creeksneakers2 writes:

    The news certificate Hawaii issued would be an official state birth certificate, but it would list the out of state place where the birth occured under place of birth. It would not fraudulently name Hawaii as the place of birth if that wasn't true. Do you see the difference?

    =====================================

    You are now making gigantic assumptions about facts not in evidence.

    The document on the web has not been certified by anyone but by some friends of Obama.

    If that document tells the truth and the whole truth, then why not show it to any Official, be it the Court or anyone and have it verified as authentic.

    Why spend upwards of a million dollars instead of just handing that very document over to the Court?

    He refused to answer the 30 days to have done this in both the Philidelphia Case and the Supreme Court Case that went to Justice Seuter.

    ========================================

    creeksneakers2 writes:

    Suppose Delaware allowed anybody from any state to get a Delaware driver's license. Say you are from 2104 Birther Street in Lexington, Kentucky. Delaware might issue you a valid drivers license for driving in Delaware, but your true address would be listed. They would not fraudulently make up a place in Delaware for you to use as your address.

    ======================================

    Come on

    This is silly

    We are talking about the man who is the 43rd man (not 44th) to sit in the Oval Office out of millions of people who all have drivers licence.

    Get real

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  180. Obama was not president when his birth was recorded.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  181. Sooner or later by attorneys chipping away, the correct 'standing' methodology will be hit on, and then it will make it into court. So blackmombo in all your wisdom, care to tell us what that could be?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  182. carpenturr1 said:

    creeksneakers2

    Obama was not president when his birth was recorded.

    =========================================

    ?

    If the BC he had placed on the internet is valid and shows the truth, there is no reason to seal the original

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  183. hairlip said:

    Obama was not born of this earth, therefore, requiring no birth certificate. A comet lit the sky one night and the Messiah was stumbled upon, nurtured, and through careful guidance became leader of the free world without question. (This, according to the OHB worshippers.) The rest of you Cretins, pony up...

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  184. shipley130 said:

    There are people trying to prove the case in court but it keeps getting blocked. Are you disputing the FACT that the birth certificate that Obama released to the public is a BC that can be obtained for a child not born in the U.S.? That is a FACT. Related to that fact is the possibility that he was born in a non U.S. country which makes him ineligibile for POTUS. I don't care about anyone's alleged motivations behind the BC controversy. I just want the truth. Everybody in the world have "motivations".

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  185. I'm disputing the fact that someone from out of state could obtain a Hawaiian birth certificate that fraudulently said they were born in Hawaii.

    Obama's certificate says he was born in Honolulu. An out of stater couldnt' get one that said that.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  186. electropig said:

    Let's look at the facts, people!

    If I was in Barry's position and I had a choice of either wasting $20.00 of my own money to produce a birth certificate for YOU to verify, or wasting millions (or billions) of YOUR money to stall forever, the only obvious choice would be to waste YOUR money and keep my $20.00 in my pocket.

    Simply put, it doesn't matter one way or another, because of the fact that since the Throne of the US Empire has never (knowingly) been usurped before, there are simply no procedures in place to depose the emperor, so the point is moot.

    Any way you slice it, he's keeping his $20.00, no matter how much of YOUR money he has to piss away to do it...and he also knows that all of you are going to pay your taxes to make sure that he's well-funded enough to keep up the fight.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  187. carpenturr1 said:

    The Court of Public opinion is going to decide this simply because the people have been denied access to the Legal System.

    Every person who looks at all the problems are asking the very same questions and see we are being stonewalled

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  188. The Court of Public opinion is the only court available to you. And the Court of Public Opinion only convenes once every four years, in Obama's case.

    I'd wish you good luck but you wouldn't know what to do with it if you could get it.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  189. hairlip said:

    Amandarikker...

    or what ever your handle is......

    Jeez. I thought I had you cornered a few days ago and you had come over to the other side. But now you are backsliding again. Of course, we would know what to do with it as that same Court of Public Opinion could act much faster than four years through our wonderful Representative system.

    And, along those same lines. Would it gratify you to know that a "poser" put one over on the populace but unfortunately got caught??? And if so, how???

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  190. Hairlip,

    English, please. And please try to shackle your words with the germ of an idea. That way I can know how to reply. Gibberish doesn't work for me. And I mean that in the most loving sense. It's not criticism.

    Cock back and re-fire.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  191. hairlip said:

    Sorry..... let me pause for a while and come back with

    "birfer" type language.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  192. Truth Seeker said:

    "Why Obama wants to hide his birth certificate."

    http://tinyurl.com/mt7vn2

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  193. autoxman said:

    blackmonrikker you are so full of it!

    If you are so smart then please answer these questions honestly:

    Why has he spent millions to prevent us from seeing his birth certificate, passport, and college application?

    If he was eligible, he would be proud to show those documents and quiet those who question his eligibility.

    Why weren't all candidates treated equal, every one except Obama had to PROVE their eligibility?

    Why has he been given a pass in providing proof?

    Why is he afraid to have these documents public?

    What is he hiding?

    Is it that he knows those documents would be the downfall and disgrace of his presidential election?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  194. electropig said:

    Let's put this to bed once and for all.

    The "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" situated at Washington, DC is a legally registered CORPORATION. This is a known fact to all.

    Corporations APPOINT their CEO's, they do NOT vote for them. If they do not vote for them, logically they also do not ELECT them. If "The People" do not ELECT the president (of the CORPORATION) then the president must, therefore, be APPOINTED by the CORPORATE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

    Now why would they want ot keep Barry's citizenship private? Easy! It's none of the public's business, since they are not on the board of directors of the CORPORATION known as "THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA."

    Take this one step further and you come to the conclusion that "The People" spend THEIR money to sue for the truth which THE CORPORATION does not wish to offer, and for which THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS has not authorized such a release of information. Therefore, THE CORPORATION authorizes "The People's" money be spent to hide the fact that the truth must be hidden from The People, lest they grow a collective frontal lobe and STOP PAYING THE CORPORATION TO OPRESS THEM.

    THE CORPORATION of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA loses nothing with these lawsuits since they are initiated by The People, who pay for initiating the suits, and the money to Defend those suits (or dismiss them, in most cases) is taken FROM The People as well, to be certain that THE CORPORATION suffers no loss due to those suits. THE CORPORATION loses nothing, and The People pay for both the initiation of the suit, and it's defense.

    Obviously, Barry's hiding, but he's doing so at the direction of the OFFICERS OF THE CORPORATION that hired him.

    Public perception about the "government" of "The United States of America" has simply been WRONG since the 1930s, and until the people get their heads around the FACTS, NOTHING WILL EVER CHANGE! Argue all you want to, because it doesn't matter to them...but the people do have the power to DISSOLVE THE CORPORATION!

    Now does anyone see the ONLY real solution to the problem, here, or is everyone prepared to continue to waste time arguing over things which have no bearing on the truth?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  195. carpenturr1 said:

    electropig

    You got it

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  196. ... as I said before, when he doesn't go along with the program as they the (THE REAL PUPPET MASTERS) want, they will out or oft him themselves.

    2 years ago
    0
    0