2nd major billboard company rejects eligibility campaign
Lamar Outdoor says 'it's misleading to indicate there's question about president's birth certificate'
Is Lamar also a part of the larger conspiracy?
Birthers weigh in.
2nd major billboard company rejects eligibility campaign
Tags: billboard wnd birth certificate
Comments (32)
Lamar Outdoor is right.
Besides; if there were 'question of his eligibility,' it should've-been/WAS -dealt with when he put up the presidential bid and -resolved before letting him run!
I for one think We The People should be outraged at this obvious act at subversion of truth on the part of Lamar. In fact I present the argument that all in the movement boycott Lamar by refusing to look at their signs. I know I for one will be closing my eyes whenever I pass one of these commie corp.'s signs on the interstate, and I argue that all in the birther movement do the same. That will show those cowards that We The People mean business, and We The People are here to stay!
*DISCLAIMER: This is an attempt at humor at the expense of the birther movement. I absolutely DO NOT ADVOCATE DRIVING ON THE INTERSTATE WITH YOUR EYES CLOSED.
Uncle.....
Oh, sure..... like that was possible at the time any moreso than it is now. That information has been blocked from access since day one. It was a well choreographed campaign. The fact remains that we know nothing more about the man past his Senate position and his ACORN association other than he "smoked a little weed and scored a little blow when he could afford it."
Further, if I were to look at the Lamar controversy from the Statist standpoint, I would say.."it doesn't name names, who's to say it's meant to denegrate the POTUS?" It could be anyone....maybe Yeti.....
I hope it is about me! That would make my day, my week, my year even! That's definitely a story I could tell the grandkids about.
So, hairlip, why don't you get in touch with Farah over at the Nut and see about indicting Yeti Descendant alongside the president- You guys can all claim that I am a (insert accusation here), and you can give me even more to laugh about when you start looking for the birth certificate of a guy who claims to be a descendant of the abominable snowman!
That should give your movement TONS of press, and it will probably add more to the Nut's overwhelming journalistic credibility.
Let the Yeti movement begin!
Yeti...
I have no doubts that you are legal. Besides, what you do in life couldn't possibly have any effect on my life or well-being....
And if it were possible that you could affect my well being, I would be one of the first to want to know everything possible about you before I casted my vote......
YETI ! WHERE'S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE ?
Right now, hairlip, I have put into motion a plan involving millions of dollars in attorney's fees to prove that I don't exist- you will never find me! The records will plainly show that, although I am typing messages to you here- in REALITY I am just a fictional creature. Or am I?
Don't trust what the records say- they HAVE BEEN FALSIFIED! I tell you this now because I think there are a growing number of people concerned with the Yeti and his ilk- it seems they are cunning creatures able to outwit birthers at every turn- but you will never be able to prove their existence unless you move fast on this subject to expose the TRUTH- the FACTS!
The fact is that the Trilterals, FEMA, and the Bildergergers are secretly under Yeti influence, and are attempting a takoeover of the U.S. in the name of the Yeti cause. The more they outwit the birthers the stronger the Yeti become- so be quick, make haste, the TRUTH is on your side!
How can a question, "Where is the birth certificate?", be misleading? That is a ridiculous excuse.
Lamar Outdoor Advertising is practicing censorship, which is their right as owners of the medium, but they are also engaging in bad business. When one has the money to call the fiddler, the fiddler has the obligation to play the tune.
Could it be that Lamar Outdoor Advertising has witnessed the heavy hand on AIG, Chrysler and GM and decided to "play it safe" and not piss off the central planners in the White House?
What's a vote mean on this? Are we voting for Lamar to deny the campaign? Or are we voting for the censureship to get attention?
I voted yes for the censureship to get attention.
Obviously afraid to be questioned
yeti
'You' can run but 'you' can't hide....... Why??? Because you don't have the money to hide in plain site. How do I know???
Well. For starters, you wouldn't be wasting your time making comments on this asinine blog and carrying water for a charlatan.
Why is it that if necessary, we could find out everything about you, yeti, if the Government wanted to and not anything about the POTUS background. How does that compute??? When I joined the Air Force many years ago and needed a Secret clearance for my job, the FBI inquired in my home town about me and my background. With this in mind, The POTUS could not have received a security clearance because of the mystery he has created..
And yes, yeti, you can be fictional if you want to....
We are in trouble people.
I'm with you, yeti descendant. I don't exist either; oh, maybe I did before, and maybe I will when I'm descending from the clouds of spicy meataboll and extend the Noodley Appendage upon the French financieress, but right now I'm just a story related to your creator.
Or Not.
ivan_yurkenov, money does not have the power to name the fiddler's tune.
Jay, thank you for the opportunity to correct my minor error; I meant to say, "When one has the money to pay the fiddler, one has the right to call the tune, and the fiddler has the obligation to play the tune."
Is that more to your liking?
ibeen_jerkenov-
The fiddler could also say: "You have money- go buy a fiddle, and play your own damm tune."
That's the fiddlers choice in the U.S.- granted by the Constitution that you love to quote.
Yeti
Not in this administration. The Government will take your money, buy you a fiddle or what ever instrument it wants you to have, program you to play certain tunes and then tax any donations you receive in your hat......
Did you get your $250.00 back yet???? It's Taxable.........
It was only your money in the first place. How benevolent of the Messiah.... Don't get started on the Constitution....
Hey sasquatch, in the real world where people have jobs, the fiddler feeds his family with his fiddle...ah, what's the use, why waste my time?
You and monkeymon live with Mom and Dad, and only play here for pocket change from ACORN.
I have an idea: why don't you chaps organize ACORN under the SEIU or AFL-CIO or Teamsters? That way you could make some real coinage and prove that you Bolsheviks are consistent>
ivan,
Closer; but to that I say, 'True, the fiddler has "an obligation" to play the paid-for tune (bigger obligation the more money paid); but the fiddler is not limited to one obligation ... `e is also obligated to make sure regular customers stay regular (why take of the once-a-decade geyser when the little stream provides all you need daily?)'
BOYCOTT businesses that use LAMAR advertising and tell them you are boycotting them because they advertise with LAMAR.
BOYCOTT businesses that drop LAMAR because of birther nonsense and tell them you are boycotting them because they're gullible fools.
Bet my pool of boycotters is bigger than yours. 7;-]
Now still another refuses - see WND.COM
There doesn't appear to be any reason to turn down the business unless the billboard company is partisan or intimidated by the Government.
There is so much "crap" on billboards that meets the eye and this message certainly does qualify in that category. Why was I asked by my once five year old Son to explain what "ALL NUDE" meant? Why don't the billboard companies object to messages such as these??? Talk about hypocrits...
It is provactitive, however, and upsets the we won, so there, crowd.
The question remains...... Where is it ???
My apologies to the "grammar police."
PROVOCATIVE
Wow, you mean we've still got companies that value sanity over greed?
Wow, just look at the insane frenzied frothing of the mouth over a Bill Board that has a question on it.
Just think, these people being mentally sick, some have positions of power in government.
Never in my life have I seen such a frothing of the mouth over as Bill Board
Considering that your only activity here has been to try to disrupt the intended function of the site by posting inane, irrelevant and generally false BS....
Twitchy
Why you so full of hate and anger?
You have a bad childhood?
You're projecting again. Birtherism is based on hate and anger, like most other conspiracy theories.
So, how was your childhood? Mine was fairly normal.
Bityerism is based on respect for the constitution and the rule of law. Until a court or congress investigates and answers the legal eligibility questions, birtherism will grow and thrive.
Birthers have no respect for anything. Basically, they appear to simply be sore losers. And the "sore" is optional in many cases.
BO has documented his birth in Hawaii. There aren't any more legitimate questions on the subject.
What passport did UHBAMA use when he was shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi ? How did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later??? And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi , what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration? The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers. It makes the debate over UHbama's citizenship a rather short and simple one.
Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?
A: Yes, by his own admission.
Q: What passport did he travel
under?
A: There are only three possibilities. 1. He traveled with a U.S. Passport, 2) He traveled with a British passport, or 3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport.
Q: Is it possible that UHbama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981?
A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981.
Conclusion: When UHbama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport.
If he was traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And if he was traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove that he
relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967..
Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a "natural born" American citizen between 1981 and 2008.
Given the destructive nature of his plans for America, as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better.
freedomfighter4theplanet,
That might be interesting, except that Pakistan was NOT "on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981". Since that's a lie, the whole argument becomes doubtful.