THE NEW RULES BEING DEBATED IN THE COURTS WILL MAKE THE APPEAL PROCEDURE AS ANTIQUATED AND LABOR INTENSIVE AS IS THE INTERFERENCE PRACTICE (WHICH COULD USE SIGNIFICANT UPDATING OUT OF THE STONE AGE). IF THE PLAN OF MAKING IT EXCESSIVE AND REPETITIVE TO THE POINT OF NAUSEA IS TO TAKE AWAY THE RIGHT OF THE SMALL GUY TO A GUARANTEED RIGHT BY MAKING IT FINANCIALLY PROHIBITIVE, AND THEREFORE GIVING LARGE ENTITIES AN UNJUST ADVANTAGE, THEN THIS WILL DO THE TRICK. BUT AT WHAT COST? THE SMALL BUSINESS/INDIVIDUAL FORM THE BACKBONE OF THE NATION. NOT BIG BUSINESS. SO IF YOU BREAK THE BACKBONE OF THE NATION, THE USPTO WILL BECOME A GHOST TOWN.
I agree
Voting is Disabled
7 votes
I disagreeRank2799
Idea#3207
This idea is active.
Legal & Policy Challenges
»
Vote Activity Show
-
Disagreed2 years ago
-
Disagreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Disagreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Disagreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Disagreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Disagreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Disagreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Disagreed2 years ago
-
Disagreed2 years ago
-
Disagreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago


Comments (0)