There is an article, talking about the very Airfrance plane that crashed, the other day, being checked for a bomb, right before take off, because of a terrorist bomb threat. How come this story is being covered up??? I came across it at Drudge.com and momento24.com. I think we need to find out for sure, was there a bomb threat on 5/27, and is it true, that the plane was actually held on the ground for an hour plus, while police checked it for an explosive?
Like Obama's birth right to be president, we must get the facts and truth, out, and whether or not these extremely important stories are fact.
Comments (6)
it's not a suggestion. it's news
What is Obama's real message here, if he filters out ideas and valid questions? Didn't Obama claim this site is for everyone ??? Why does a hidden moderator want to remove these questions, rather than investigate, and find out the truth???
nikias Yes, but it is news the government must provide more data accessibility of, as the heading states.
Much like the demands of Obama to provide his birth documentation, to prove his right to lead our nation, all 'data must be more accessible'.
From a message from the site admin posted to the front page this morning:
-
What distinguishes this site from an ordinary "suggestion box," however, is your ability to vote on those ideas you believe are the best. Ideas gain traction not by having been submitted in many different instances, but when the community comes together in support of individual ideas and votes them up the list.
Over the past few days, we have seen this in action, as the Discussion has begun to focus predominantly on a set of postings that are highly redundant to one another, in effect "crowding out" the diverse range of ideas that we truly hope to gain from this discussion. When this happens, regardless of the content of these ideas, the discussion loses its ability to directly inform the White House's work on issues of open and transparent government.
Our attitude is that any idea, respectfully presented, is a legitimate contribution to the site. Whether or not it is relevant to the discussion is for you to decide, which you can do by voting ideas up or down. But please keep in mind that flooding the site with comments about any single topic dilutes both the importance of that topic and the effectiveness of the Dialogue overall.
-
So now, we are asking you for your help. Vote down the postings you feel are counterproductive to maintaining a free-flowing exchange of ideas, and flag content that you feel is duplicative or inappropriate to the discussion.
We will continue to actively moderate this site by removing any idea or comment that violates our moderation policy.
With your help, this site will remain an open, focused dialogue that will help shape the President's commitment to transparency in government.
Thank you,
The National Academy of Public Administration
To help support Obama's stated goal, by the moderator, of commitment to transparency in government, then revealing whether or not, there was a terrorist bomb threat, and eventually a successful execution, would defintiely fall in line with Obama's stated goal, and this sites, guidelines.
We all want to thruth, and I agree with Obama, for wanting it out as well. After all, this category of " making data more accessable " is the right place for this free-flowing exchange of ideas.
New information has been revealed. Investigators are confused, as to how the debris field, across the ocean, is over 60 miles apart, and the plane appears to have "broken up". One investigator stated, he could not explain how a new plane, would just break up in mid-air, rather than go into the water in one piece, subsequently sinking, within a very confined space.
Brazil has put out information stating, there was an oil slick, which they say eliminates a bomb theory, but they can not explain the distance of the debris spread, of over 60 miles. Another investigator stated, we may never know what happened. SO the question remains, did a terrorist bombing happen, and the authorities in Brazil are trying to save face, by denials? Or can enough of the plane be examined to explain if the plane, did simply come apart in flight? Either way, something is terribly worng with this unfortunate crash, and we must do everything we can to find out exactly what DID happen.