I agree
Voting is Disabled

-76 votes

I disagree

Rank31128

Idea#2220

This idea is active.
Strategic Planning and Budgeting »

Get rid of most of the military

Why Is This Idea Important?: We are running trillions of dollars in the hole. Something big has to go. If we don't get rid of most of the military the money will come out of tax increases or cuts to public medical plans that will leave millions without needed health care. The military, since it now mostly exists for people who aren't even Americans, is the largest government expense and the least needed.

The Cold War is over and no country is left out there that has the means and desire to invade us. Most of the military mission now is to play world policeman. We could save trillions if we just told the rest of the world they have to carry their share of the burden of keeping international peace or we quit.

We have problems with terrorism but the military can't do much about that, since we don't know who or where all the terrorists are. There's the possibility of a state sponsored attack but we already have more than enough weapons to make any country that tries very sorry that they did.

So we need enough to respond to state terror attacks, we need nukes, and we need a small token force to contribute to UN actions like the French do.

Everything else should go.

Submitted by creeksneakers2 2 years ago

Vote Activity Show

Comments (22)

  1. bacaricketts said:

    "Like the French do" France has been overrun numerous times in history...their wives and daughters raped and killed...go figure...and there are governments in this world that would invade our country in a heartbeat should we do what you are suggesting...I assume you would also do away with our 2nd Ammendment rights as well. I believe you should catch the next flight to France! I'll pay for the ticket.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  2. bacaricketts said:

    Sure...here is a short list.

    Russia

    North Korea

    Iran

    Mexico

    China

    Cuba

    Numerous Middle East countries

    Why do you think countries have armies? Answer: To defend themselves. The U.S. would be a bonanza of wealth just for it's natural resources alone. I'm still open to buying your ticket to France...you ungrateful slug. Freedom is not free...next time you see a vet...shake his or her hand for the freedom you now exercise.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  3. thebookout said:

    This is the dumbest idea I have ever heard. This is like removing the shell of a turtle.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  4. bacaricketts said:

    I respect your viewpoint...however...I do not agree with it in any sense...you are living in a fantasy world filled with delusions...I am not going to argue with someone who believes in standing down our defenses...just take a look at the number of negative botes you have received...it's hard to believe there are such ignorant people as yourself that actually call themsleves Americans...what a shame!

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  5. It is my opinion that we should not have communists in power in the USA.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  6. thebookout said:

    The number of votes against this is evidence of the prevailance of common sense.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  7. It is well known that Islam wants to take over the USA.

    Just because you did not know this does not make you smarter.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  8. bacaricketts said:

    Thebookout...you are absolutely correct. This guy who wrote this post sounds like one of my political professors in college...completely ignorant of the world we live in today. Creeksneakers2....my suggestion to you is to read up on history and learn from those countries who were governed by people like you...you will find that in each instance...that country was conquered and defeated in days...I'm still open to buying you that ticket to France! One way of course.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  9. @creeksneakers2:

    AIG puts sharia financing into USA economy. Islamic groups seek privileged status in MI to get foot baths. Somalia immigrants want Eid instead of Christmas. Little by little they take away rights from others to secure privilege for themselves. Eventually you have sharia being allowed in arbitration (see U.K.) and then the downward spiral begins. The honor killings (see Canada), terrorist attacks (see attacks on two USA soldiers by USA Islam convert), etc. Soon after good people either leave or shut up an take it. The US Constitution is adjusted to allow sharia then sharia is given precedence (see Pakistan).

    The evidence is all around. Just open you your eyes.

    Clear enough?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  10. bacaricketts said:

    Costa Rica...Canada...and many other countries have no need for a huge standing army because we...the U.S. provide for their security. Come-on...don't tell me you are that ignorant...go back to school and pay attention this time...better yet...get your butt down to the local recruiter and sign up....that would be the best thing for you and others as well....it's been a real pleasure.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  11. That's weird. creeksneakers2 made a bunch of comments about how unlikely it is that Islam is a problem now and all his posts are gone. Right after he mentions Costa Rica. Weird.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  12. Perhaps mine are next to go?

    Before I go I just wanted to say...

    Where's the Birth Certificate?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  13. thebookout said:

    I find it interesting that this topic hasn't been removed. Some bias perhaps on the part of the moderators?

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  14. btcwiebe said:

    Bring them home. Close overseas bases, what a waste of money. Like a trillion(with a T) dollars. Have them protect our borders with border patrol.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  15. pdennany said:

    The US is the driver behind much of the world war efforts, and involved somehow in virtually all of them. Our Military is a threat to peace in the world rather than it's claim to the contrary. If we used just one tenth of the money we waste on military and our wars of aggression on diplomancy and helping the countries where our corporations rob them of their resourses we would need only a small self defence forse as a routine shield back here at home.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  16. polarik said:

    There's no proof whatsoever that Obama was born in Hawaii. No one has ever seen his real birth certificate.

    My 160-page final report, "Obama's Born Conspiracy," can be found here:

    http://polarik.blogtownhall.com

    It contains the five months of empirical research that I conducted on Obama's alleged "Certification of Live Birth"

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  17. kdtroxel said:

    Fear and military spending are the opiates that motivate our own insecurities.

    Voted Up

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  18. I made many comments but they were all deleted. I don't know why.

    I challenged all who disagreed with me to name one country that has the means and desire to attack us militarily. Whatever else they said, no one named one.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  19. pit-king said:

    I just got on here looked at first colum about downsizing the military.the posts are from 10 days ago and I look at one colum and see the presidents birth cirt mentioned 2 or 3 times after the actions of this week we should be more carefull of what we say and how we say it.whats his birth cirt have to do with this subject or any other he was elected,has been president,and will be president even if you think he's from outer space so what is your point with this and other silly arguments. I am for keeping force same size and adding manpower till things around world calm down just like some of the politics around here.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  20. Big Rooster said:

    How about get rid of Creek because Creek has been busted trying to tell lies just to make herself look smart.

    Creek has been telling lies on this website and needs to be ran off.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  21. kdtroxel said:

    Projected military spending in 2009 is $745 billion dollars; the rest of the world (every country besides US) spends about $500 billion dollars. Terrorism has no face; it is anyone who isn’t us. Who decided that we the USA must have to police the world of so called terrorists? How many innocent civilians have to die to kill supposed terrorists? Is there such a thing as an end to either war/occupation? Is there a benchmark to call a win in Afghanistan? Or are we going to kill, irradiate, and land mine the whole country until it is a complete lifeless rock, then call it a win?

    The words “remember 9/11” rings hollow when you take in the fact that we have lost over 5k dead and nine times that wounded of our US soldiers and millions of them, citizens and combatants. The military monetary cost of the war from inception to date is approximately: Iraq $679 billion and Afghanistan $191 billion for a total of $870 billion. (Note: the war cost numbers do not add up, yearly cost of $745 and total cost, I cannot find an accurate source for costs) Now add in the cost of the privatization aspect of the war effort, KBR, Halliburton, Blackwater and other privatized forces, permanent structures and bases, plus the cost of medical treatments, VA benefits, and interest on the debt to fund the wars, the true cost should exceed $3 Trillion dollars.

    Now imagine what we could be doing with $3 trillion dollars if we had no war/occupation. We could be using it to fund college tuitions, single-payer health care, social security, Medicare, curing diseases, investments in growing our economy and jobs. It is a guns & butter question; economic gains or imperial military expansion. All this expense so that one person (Bush Jr.) can make his daddy happy and be a war time president, for it was his decision to put boots on the ground, he could have done military air strikes and ended it there.

    After you look at 9/11 from the point of view that it was an inside job then the whole justification to invade innocent and sovereign countries brings us to some very dark territory. A ton of evidence is pointing to this conclusion, such as Final Cut Loose Change, Zeitgeist pt 2, Thermite found in WTC dust, third WTC building drops at near rate of gravity without being hit by anything, this list goes on and on.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  22. pdennany said:

    A new eyeopening video giving actual eye wittness testimony, and the creation of ralse evidence to support the Officially intended false story of what really did happened to the Pentagon on 9-11

    http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/nsa.html

    This, and thousands of other real and circumstantial evidences clearly make the so called "terrorists attacks" of 9-11 a a covert US false flagg operation by the leadership elements of our Defence Department, NORAD, the Vice President and Vice President of the United States, the CIA, the 9-11 Commission leadership, and several agencies whoes job it was to protect the People.

    The intent of the hoax attacks of 9-11 was to justify the already planned invasions into the Middle East.

    2 years ago
    0
    0