OpenGov - Open Government Brainstorm

the people perpetrating this man-made global warming fraud should be held personally responsible for all the expense spent on this fraud by the governments of the world

Global Warming is a scam.

It started with Bert Bolin rewriting the UN IPCC findings. The consensus of scientists was that there was no discernible contribution by humans on the climate. Bert Bolin then edited the findings to show there WAS a contribution by humans and if we didn't redistribute the wealth the world would burst into flames.

Read more here:

http://www.zmag.org/znet/viewArticle/15306

Now look at the Chairs and Vice chairs of the IPCC. Wealth redistribution activists (ie Richard Odingo) and Yuri Izrael - the man responsible for disseminating false information to the Russian people on the Chernobyl radiation dangers. The man's sole claim to fame is he peddled lies to the Russian people.

I don't even recycle anymore because I am so offended by how the movement has been hijacked by agenda driven fear mongers peddling junk science.

I worked in the scientific field for 10 years - so I understand the process of peer review and can interpret data without bias. This whole thing is a hoax.

People like Mann (hockey stick fame) hide their data from peers - and others have to 'reverse engineer' their data to uncover the lies they are peddling.

Looks to me like the big push for us to believe in the hoax of global warming, is so we'll pass the trade laws that benefit the companies that will trade in carbon credits, etc. Apparently, companies in which Gore, BHO, and others, have a great deal of money invested.

This could be nothing more than a scam to enrich themselves and their partners. Trying to find out more, but information is slow to emerge.

Scientists claim that “greenhouse gases” are causing global warming. What are “greenhouse gases” you ask? Carbon dioxide and water vapor. Yes you read that correctly (plants are a user of carbon dioxide and a huge emitter of water vapor). What is the primary emitter of carbon dioxide? Well… we are (and animals too but animals are more important than humans). But if people are the ones who emit one of the primary causes (carbon dioxide) of “global warming” how do you start the process of eliminating the emitters? You have to control and reduce the population of people (we do however have to protect owls and little fishies).

Okay, here’s where the carbon tax and socialized medicine tie in together. If they can pass Cap and Trade (remember that people are the primary emitter of carbon dioxide), they use the money to establish a socialized healthcare program. They then use the socialized healthcare program to reduce the human population by rationing healthcare thus reducing life expectancies and weeding out undesired “strains” of people. By having everyone’s medical history on an electronic database, they basically have a “pedigree chart” for every human being and can weed out “family lines” that are prone to cancers, heart disease and other “undesirable” illnesses. They can also weed out drug users including tobacco and alcohol. In just a few generations, they would have a new “super human.” A human that rarely gets sick or needs medical care. A human that takes care of itself by eating and drinking the right substances and exercising because they’re afraid of the day when the chopping block comes around for them. Unless of course, you are a member of the “elite.” In that case you can afford your own medical care. This is how they will reduce the “living.”

How will they reduce the “unliving?” Well we know the answer to that. Abortions. They will force abortions on the “undesired strains” of people. The culls. They will also force abortions on women who’s fetuses have tested positive for an “undesired” disease thus eliminating the possibility of an “undesired human” polluting their “super human” race. They will also limit the number of children people can have.

This is how Cap and Trade and Socialized Healthcare tie in together.

CAUSE:

PEOPLE = CARBON DIOXIDE = GREEN HOUSE GASES = GLOBAL WARMING (we all know that this is ridiculous. Global warming is simply an excuse to tighten the noose)

SOLUTION:

PASS A LAW THAT ALLOWS ELECTRONIC DATABASING OF ALL MEDICAL RECORDS (ALREADY PASSED LAST MONTH) TO KEEP TRACK OF MEDICAL “PEDIGREE.” IMPOSE A NEW TAX CALLED CAP AND TRADE UNDER THE GUISE OF ELIMINATING THE “CARBON FOOTPRINT” BY FORCING ELECTRIC PROVIDERS INTO A CERTAIN LEVEL OF “COMPLIANCE”. USE THE MONEY GENERATED TO IMPLEMENT THE USSA’S NEW HEALTHCARE PROGRAM. LAST BUT NOT LEAST, PASS THE FREEDOM OF CHOICE ACT ALLOWING TAXPAYER DOLLARS TO FUND ABORTIONS WORLDWIDE. WHAT DO YOU HAVE? YOU HAVE YOURSELF AND YOUR NEIGHBORS PAYING FOR THE GOVERNMENTS PLANNED ELIMINATION OF …. WELL… YOU.

If anyone thinks this is a “Conspiracy Theory”, think again. This is Conspiracy history folks. Every government since the dawn of time has enslaved its people. They got rich off the backs of the people. They also did “selective breeding.” Just like we did to the slaves before the Civil War. We bred a race of “super slaves.” People who were strong and fast so that they could work harder and longer on the plantations. Our government is going to do the same thing to us if we don’t stop them.

The UK is already “discussing” the possibility of rationing healthcare and they already deny healthcare to women in advanced stages of breast cancer. That means no pain medication or anything. Their families will simply watch them die. The second largest “cash cow” in the world, behind China’s Red Army is the UK’s socialized healthcare program. They are going to start reducing its cost by elimination of the “undesired.”

We’re next.

Hmmmm....As a Scientific mind, I'm not sure where to fall on this one. There is no randomized control trial for Global Warming, it is just a well thought out theory. Some environmental evidence my show correlations with carbon use and warming, but in a non-randomized experiment there are endless unknown confounders, meaning that from a strict scientific point of view we can never really prove or disprove global warming, just add corroborating or detracting evidence to debate over the theory. Is it a good enough theory that we should be concerned? Yes, it seems scientifically sound and plausible. Should we change our entire economy and way of life because of it??-probably not, as we don't know if this will have the desired effect.

Al Gore’s venture capital firm has invested $6 million in a software company that stands to make billions of dollars from cap-and-trade regulation — further fueling controversy that Gore lied about his profiteering from cap-and-trade to Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and the House Energy and Environment Subcommittee during testimony in April.

Hara Software sells software to help track greenhouse gas emissions. The market for such software is now about $2.5 billion dollars in size, and is expected to grow by a factor of ten to $25 billion if cap-and-trade legislation is enacted, according to Hara CEO Amit Chatterjee.

Kleiner Perkins, a venture capital firm in which Al Gore is a partner, invested in Hara just last year. Chatterjee told Reuters that,

“This company would not have existed if Al Gore had not bought off on the idea.”

Gore is also under fire for lying to Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) at the same congressional hearing about his relationship with Goldman Sachs.

Operating as a stealth tax, cap-and-trade will make the vast majority of Americans poorer and less free — but Al Gore, Kleiner Perkins, Amit Chatterjee and Hara will be laughing all the way to the bank.