Civic Engagement at the community level isn’t about a technique or a single model. It has to be about using every resource and idea possible to stay focused on the desired outcome – to create a stronger democracy by establishing ways for people to be fully engaged and connected/involved with all levels of government. As a coalition of practitioners across a variety of civic and government organizations, we recommend that the Obama Administration consider how to nurture and advance grassroot and local efforts in civic engagement between individuals and their goverment that build on local knowledge and expertise. While there are unifying themes and ideas, there are also local aspects that must be considered as the plan to engage people is developed. This is about meeting the need where people are – literally and figuratively. Local teams from communities across the country could submit innovation/seed grants for civic engagement efforts that reflect an agreed upon set of key principles, including the ones that have been determined by the national organizations involved in these initial conversations. The applications would make use of local resources and partnerships. Part of any application would also require an evaluation component. As part of this effort, the Obama Administration could create a network of practitioners trying out various approaches to community issues so that all of us could learn from each other. This model has been used very successfully by the GATES Foundation in their work—grantees are encouraged and supported to learn from each other’s work. Such an approach would also provide the Federal Government with opportunities to evaluate what works and doesn’t work going forward.
I agree
Voting is Disabled
39 votes
I disagreeRank1324
Idea#753
This idea is active.
New Tools and Technologies
»
Vote Activity Show
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Disagreed2 years ago
-
Disagreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Disagreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Disagreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago


Comments (3)
I quite liked your comment because I connected with your opening sentence. As a teacher I have developed a style based on blending the best of many ideas, techniques and knowledge of different learning and thinking styles, cultural morays, and open ended learning. I will be posting my idea about changing education later today and would be interested in your opinion. It will be under new strategies and techniques. Thank you for your idea. S. Hawkins
I would hope that through transparent review of the possibilities and further public awareness that Government support to all humanity for access to affordable wireless communications and associated imbedded applications becomes accelerated into an immediate reality. Ideas of energy conservation and modernizing how we communicate information on a global scale become apparent with a brief analysis of current abilities using satellites and wireless communications devices. We should be extraordinarily supporting the transition to this communication style as it is the most cost effective way to upgrade humanity into the 21st century.
Want to see the surplus money the US government and all states, local governments have? http://CAFR1.com and http://TaxRetirement.com
and support Campaign for Liberty