I agree
Voting is Disabled

18 votes

I disagree

Rank2170

Idea#420

This idea is active.
Records Management »

Data Mining/Knowledge Refining from Legacy Federal Documents

Why Is This Idea Important?: It is likely that the preponderance of societal value obtainable from the aggregate federal document collection has yet to extracted from it.

The legacy data held by our government is the largest body of dormant, unassimilated factual nonfiction literature in the history of the world. Millions of pages of scientific papers, proposals, studies, reports, etc. lie fallow, either becaue they preceeded the digital age or have foundered in the backwaters of the labyrinth, with no one to champion their relevance in the 21st Century. Empower each agency (deep down into the bureaucracy, practically to the individual program level) to designate its own Cognitive Archivist, charged solely with the responsibility for assimilating the prior institutional knowledge base toward the extraction of prospectively useful recovered data and 'lessons learned' which may assist the organization in more effectively accomplishing its mission in the future. Since the federal workforce is considerably older than that of the private sector, and will undergo wholesale changeout of personnel (estimated at 600,000) in the next few years, this initiative to build and protect a worker-independent institutional memory should receive a significant high priority from the new Administration. Perhaps more importantly, the Cognitive Archivist can develop these information resources into new knowledge-based services for their agency's user community, academia, and industry at large.

Submitted by david.wenbert 2 years ago

Vote Activity Show

Comments (2)

  1. ABSOLUTELY. We don't know what we already know. See the Open Source Agency initiative as a possible home for this important idea.

    2 years ago
    0
    0
  2. frank said:

    The idea is a good one but what about the cost? How many "Cognitive Archivists" would there be? That title says to me that we're talking about more than just a clerk with a high speed scanner. Sounds expensive. That's okay but it better have real and measurable ROI.

    It also sounds like the archivist will be making value judgments that could devolve into censorship of information. Who will the archivist be? Who hires this person and how is accountability to the people maintained?

    There's a certain level of comfort in the current state of affairs. The information is almost useless but it's all there.

    2 years ago
    0
    0