The Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 requires agencies to create strategic plans that include mission statements, general goals and objectives, performance goals, and planned program evaluations. The law also requires annual performance plans to be created that contain performance goals and performance indicators. Agencies are required to consult with Congress and stakeholders about strategic plans. There is no requirement that agencies consult with Congress and stakeholders about performance indicators. But these things are used as barometers and definitions of "success." OMB and agencies should be required to publish draft mission statements, goals, measures, evaluation plans, and evaluation criteria for judging "success" in the Federal Register for public notice and comment. OMB and agencies should be required to respond to this feedback. Some idiots will respond, of course, but many serious groups, including interest groups, will have serious responses. Because goals and metrics guide agency activities and are used as a basis, ultimately, for appraising the peformance of federal employees, OMB and agencies need scrutiny in how they use discretion under law to set goals and pursue them. Otherwise, the president and political appointees enjoy tremendous power over career civil servants and get to impose their preferences, which oftentimes can frustrate congressional intent. OMB and agencies should also have open hearings to discuss these matters with the public.
I agree
Voting is Disabled
17 votes
I disagreeRank2219
Idea#320
This idea is active.
New Strategies and Techniques
»
Vote Activity Show
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Disagreed2 years ago
-
Disagreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Disagreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Disagreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Disagreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago
-
Agreed2 years ago


Comments (1)
Dear fellow "Idea" brainstormers and commentors:
For news and moderated discussion (public, but unofficial) about the
continuing development and implementation of the "Open Government
Directive", you are invited to either:
1. send mailto:opengovernmentdirective+subscribe@googlegroups.com
2. visit http://groups.google.com/group/opengovernmentdirective
NOTE: Because I am posting this to the Comment section of some
(but not all) Ideas, you may see this message more than once.
I apologize for that.
vr,
Stephen Buckley
http://www.UStransparency.com