Open Government Dialogue
« Back To OpenGov - Open Government Brainstorm
Federal, State and Local Data Consolidation
In the old days, information was a one-way avenue; government would distribute information to news and media outlets that then added their political or demographic agenda and redistributed it to the general public in the form of censored TV newscasts, radio shows and other legacy media outlets.

Welcome to the 21st century and to a world driven by information technology shared and crowdsourced by social media such as blogs, wikis, forums and social networks, where we have experienced a shift in the process of information and data, a time when the power does not reside with those that hold the information, but with those who share it. We all know that government and democracy died behind closed doors. For many years our generation sat on the backseat sharing and collaborating information by using our cell phones and social networks more efficiently and faster than any other government agency using multi-million software technologies.
Today, the type of democratized information our generation shares and collaborates still does not exist in our government. What we have is the equivalent of a locomotive and central generator power house government, co-existing in a world of advanced high speed bullet trains and the age of the power grid. The technology to consolidate and share government information has already been invented and is already in used by your average 12 year old that shares information by writing a blog entry into his MySpace, posting a YouTube video or twitting his latest “status”.

How do we accomplish data consolidation?

Let’s define the purpose of data accessibility and consolidation, why would we want to do this?

•Efficiency
•Transparency
•Accountability
•Participation
•Collaboration
•And to bridge the gap between our generation and government.

Before I delve into each category and why this idea is important, let's assume Data.gov has launched and some government data is now easily accessible.

Let me paint a real-life scenario, let’s assume federal, state, and local government data was easily accessible and consolidated into one single data feed and source at Data.gov. What we would have would then yield useful applications that could have a significant impact for “we the people”.

For example, let’s study an application designed for the Washington D.C. area named iLive.at. This application allows you to put in your home address on your phone or personal computer and based on that address, it informs you of the crimes that happened in your neighborhood, the closest bank and things of interest near you. It lets you find the buses and trains and when they are coming. So it really takes all those state and local government data feeds and gives them to you in the context of your address, presented in an interface that is not only useful but easy to understand. Now to this application add the ability for any citizen to be able to comment, rate and contribute content in the form of pictures, videos and blog entries.
This application is the prime example of consolidated government data feeds we the people can benefit from. Let’s not stop at the application level, instead let’s assume that keeping with the spirit of one of our most innovative information technology companies, Google, we create a “government suite” of applications based on the concept of collaborative, open standards and consolidated federal, state and local data feeds. A suite of applications that when downloaded to our mobile phones, laptops and personal computers allows to share, participate and be part of the inner workings of our federal, state and local government, all thanks to data consolidation.

By Erick Gonzalez
U.S. Navy Veteran and Government 2.0 Consultant
Erick.gonzalez@oracle.com

Why Is This Idea Important?

•Government Efficiency •Transparency •Accountability •Participation •Collaboration •And to bridge the gap between our generation and government.
Comments
dkastner 9 months ago
If I read your suggestion correctly, you are saying that all local government organizations should send their data to data.gov and it will in turn be distributed to users only by data.gov.

Consolidating data that way brings up several problems:
* If the single source of consolidated data fails, everyone is left without data
* A single point of data consolidation is more open to tampering and corruption
* A single entity providing all data will be less open to providing data in alternative formats

The key is aggregation services provided by third parties as well as directories that point users to where data can be found. news.google.com does not act as the single source for news, it simply aggregates several news sources. I prefer this model much more.
erick.gonzalez 9 months ago
Let me be clear, the distribution of data to the users by data.gov should and MUST include alternative and open standard formats such as: XML, CSV, Atom, KML and ESRI. as well as a single source of consolidated point of access data. What we have now is several government agencies distributing data in several different formats, which is a nightmare from a developer's point of view. Having a consolidated format will:

* Provide one single source or point of data access.
* Maximize time spent on the application design and implementation, not on data integration.
* Work on any platform, no matter of operating system.
* Be the standard.

Let's look at and learn from Google, Facebook and OpenID. What is openID? http://openid.net/ It is a single sign-on option that eliminates the need of multiple user names and passwords across different participating websites. In essence what you get as an end user is a single user name and password to login to ANY application and website on the internet, if these choose to use it. Now let's apply that same concept to government data. Having a single data format and a data consolidation into one website (data.gov) that eliminates the need to have several different "logins" or "data formats" for every application that is created, instead what you have is a single sign on (data access point) that can be used across any platform, the standard, and able to execute on any environment.

On the same note, data should not be hosted by any particular vendor, instead distributed and shared across different cloud vendors who would provide this service to the government for free, in a contributor and capacity. You see, the ultimate purpose is to have a government that saves money by providing data and receiving feedback in the most efficient way possible using the latest in technology and social media advances.

Crowdsourcing should not only be a principle of the new Government, but the driving force behind the innovation. What I mean with this is that we should be able to put to use our collective knowledge and our ability to brainstorm ideas, throw them to the wall and to see what sticks in a micro-environment, drop what doesn't work, to scale those ideas that do work. This type of efficiency and transparency will save the government billions of dollars in IT implementations and result in big gains for the average citizen who will then, be able to use data and information technology in new, meaningful ways, empowered with the data needed to make informed decisions when it comes to our elected officials and our government activities.

This is the essence of the Government 2.0.



cjsmay 9 months ago
Then when this process is acomplished we could get rid of four out of five of these organized and exspensive governments and do our own voting on legislation. We have way to much government and way to many pigs at the tax payers trough.
derek61 9 months ago
Excellent Idea. I've been working with RDFa and microformats and I believe that they may be good candidates for representing a large subset of data. Google and Yahoo have announced support for these formats. I think that use of these formats would greatly enhance searching and data mining.
erick.gonzalez 9 months ago
Consolidating government agencies would be yet, another good idea.
erick.gonzalez 9 months ago
I failed to mention microformats as a strong contender for a standard format. I think microformats, which is now supported by Google search engine, can be the perfect format for subset of data.

http://microformats.org/
Stephen Buckley 9 months ago
Dear fellow "Idea" brainstormers and commentors:

For news and moderated discussion (public, but unofficial) about the
continuing development and implementation of the "Open Government
Directive", you are invited to either:

1. send mailto:opengovernmentdirective+subscribe@googlegroups.com

2. visit http://groups.google.com/group/opengovernmentdirective

NOTE: Because I am posting this to the Comment section of some
(but not all) Ideas, you may see this message more than once.
I apologize for that.

vr,
Stephen Buckley
http://www.UStransparency.com
silona 9 months ago
um... if we asked that they make it citable ala citability.pbworks.com

then we could create this ourselves... and add commentary.
merveilleux24 9 months ago
Yes good idea, but how is your idea different form Leggitta3's Create a Federal Onestop Database of Fed/State/Local Gov't Officials with room for feedback idea?
Related Topics/Ideas
Title
































































































Security Pending Moderator Approval
Activity Chart
Controversy Meter
Idea Rank : 1435