Start with the Decision to Disclose

Rank 1892
Idea#112

Stage: Active

Campaign: Making Government Operations More Open

Openness means disclosure, followed by dissemination, which enables further interactions. But too often government agencies never make it past the first step – the decision to disclose. And so this is where reform efforts should start.

Despite the President’s declared commitment to disclosure, not even the White House meets the standard that he has set. For example, the public cannot access Obama Administration Presidential Policy Directives (PPDs) or Policy Study Directives (PSDs) through the White House web site, even when such directives are unclassified. The problem is not that the directives are in the wrong digital format, but that they have not been officially released in any format.

The failure to disclose is widespread. The intelligence community’s Open Source Center will not release its products even when they are unclassified and non-copyrighted. The Central Intelligence Agency will not release a digital version of its CREST database of declassified historical records. The military services have migrated much of their unclassified content away from the public web and placed it behind access-controlled portals. And so on.

Therefore, new emphasis should be placed on affirmative disclosure requirements. New mechanisms are needed to induce agencies to reconsider non-disclosure practices, and to adjudicate difficult cases. While the FOIA can facilitate access to particular records, it is not well-suited to the release of entire record categories.

One way to encourage improvements in disclosure practices would be to task agency CIOs to facilitate release of all non-exempt records, and to respond to public requests for modification of existing policies.

Tags

Submitted by

Feedback Score

24 votes
Voting Disabled

Idea Details

Vote Activity (latest 20 votes)

  1. Disagreed
  2. Agreed
  3. Disagreed
  4. Agreed
  5. Agreed
  6. Agreed
  7. Disagreed
  8. Agreed
  9. Agreed
  10. Disagreed
  11. Disagreed
  12. Agreed
  13. Disagreed
  14. Disagreed
  15. Agreed
  16. Disagreed
  17. Agreed
  18. Agreed
  19. Agreed
  20. Agreed
(latest 20 votes)

Similar Ideas [ 5 ]

ReviewScale

Assessment

Comments

  1. Comment
    Unsubscribed User

    Amen. The White House website "briefing room" is long on marketing and short on information.

    0 Agreed
    0 Disagreed
  2. Comment
    Unsubscribed User

    I second that! Thanks, Steve, for your longstanding support of transparency.

    0 Agreed
    0 Disagreed
  3. Comment
    Stephen Buckley

    Dear fellow "Idea" brainstormers and commentors:

    For news and moderated discussion (public, but unofficial) about the

    continuing development and implementation of the "Open Government

    Directive", you are invited to either:

    1. send mailto:opengovernmentdirective+subscribe@googlegroups.com

    2. visit http://groups.google.com/group/opengovernmentdirective

    NOTE: Because I am posting this to the Comment section of some

    (but not all) Ideas, you may see this message more than once.

    I apologize for that.

    vr,

    Stephen Buckley

    http://www.UStransparency.com

    0 Agreed
    0 Disagreed
  4. Comment
    rdittmann

    Dear Steve,

    Keep up the good work!

    Secrecy in government is a threat to the republic.

    In Solidarity,

    Roger Dittmann

    0 Agreed
    0 Disagreed