I agree to Idea Start with the Decision to Disclose
Voting Disabled

24 votes

I disagree to Idea Start with the Decision to Disclose

Rank1892

Idea#112

This idea is active.
Making Government Operations More Open »

Start with the Decision to Disclose

Openness means disclosure, followed by dissemination, which enables further interactions. But too often government agencies never make it past the first step – the decision to disclose. And so this is where reform efforts should start.

Despite the President’s declared commitment to disclosure, not even the White House meets the standard that he has set. For example, the public cannot access Obama Administration Presidential Policy Directives (PPDs) or Policy Study Directives (PSDs) through the White House web site, even when such directives are unclassified. The problem is not that the directives are in the wrong digital format, but that they have not been officially released in any format.

The failure to disclose is widespread. The intelligence community’s Open Source Center will not release its products even when they are unclassified and non-copyrighted. The Central Intelligence Agency will not release a digital version of its CREST database of declassified historical records. The military services have migrated much of their unclassified content away from the public web and placed it behind access-controlled portals. And so on.

Therefore, new emphasis should be placed on affirmative disclosure requirements. New mechanisms are needed to induce agencies to reconsider non-disclosure practices, and to adjudicate difficult cases. While the FOIA can facilitate access to particular records, it is not well-suited to the release of entire record categories.

One way to encourage improvements in disclosure practices would be to task agency CIOs to facilitate release of all non-exempt records, and to respond to public requests for modification of existing policies.

Submitted by 5 years ago

Comments (4)

  1. Unsubscribed User

    Amen. The White House website "briefing room" is long on marketing and short on information.

    5 years ago
    0 Agreed
    0 Disagreed
  2. Unsubscribed User

    I second that! Thanks, Steve, for your longstanding support of transparency.

    5 years ago
    0 Agreed
    0 Disagreed
  3. Dear fellow "Idea" brainstormers and commentors:

    For news and moderated discussion (public, but unofficial) about the

    continuing development and implementation of the "Open Government

    Directive", you are invited to either:

    1. send mailto:opengovernmentdirective+subscribe@googlegroups.com

    2. visit http://groups.google.com/group/opengovernmentdirective

    NOTE: Because I am posting this to the Comment section of some

    (but not all) Ideas, you may see this message more than once.

    I apologize for that.

    vr,

    Stephen Buckley

    http://www.UStransparency.com

    5 years ago
    0 Agreed
    0 Disagreed
  4. Dear Steve,

    Keep up the good work!

    Secrecy in government is a threat to the republic.

    In Solidarity,

    Roger Dittmann

    5 years ago
    0 Agreed
    0 Disagreed

Vote Activity Show

(latest 20 votes)